Proportions of false-positive examination findings and resulting specificities with 95% CIs when applying the 4 proposed abnormal cutoffs to the 124 healthy subjects without trauma in Part 1 of the study

Age GroupProportion of False-Positive Examination FindingsSpecificities (95% CIs)
Pang et al2 (4 mm)Gire et al3 (2.5 mm)2 SDs3 SDsPang et al2 (4 mm)Gire et al3 (2.5 mm)2 SDs3 SDs
Younger than 12 mo0/211/211/211/211.0 (0.85–1.0)0.95 (0.77–0.99)0.95 (0.77–0.99)0.95 (0.77–0.99)
12–24 mo0/1912/191/190/191.0 (0.83–1.0)0.37 (0.19–0.59)0.94 (0.73–0.99)1.0 (0.83–1.0)
2–4 yr0/1714/171/170/171.0 (0.82–1.0)0.18 (0.06–0.41)0.94 (0.73–0.99)1.0 (0.82–1.0)
5–8 yr0/1913/190/190/191.0 (0.83–1.0)0.32 (0.15–0.54)1.0 (0.83–1.0)1.0 (0.83–1.0)
9–12 yr0/163/160/160/161.0 (0.81–1.0)0.81 (0.57–0.93)1.0 (0.72–0.99)1.0 (0.81–1.0)
13–17 yr0/190/192/190/191.0 (0.83–1.0)1.0 (0.83–1.0)0.89 (0.69–0.97)1.0 (0.83–1.0)
Older than 17 yr0/130/131/130/131.0 (0.67–1.0)1.0 (0.67–1.0)0.92 (0.67–0.99)1.0 (0.67–1.0)