Correlations between laterality quotients of tracking parameters and audiometric or electrophysiologic classificationsa
| Laterality Quotient | AC | EC | Tumor Size |
|---|---|---|---|
| Volume of lateral section | r = −0.08, P = .78 | r = −0.08, P = .78 | r = 0.19, P = .49 |
| FA of lateral section | r = 0.14, P = .62 | r = 0.14, P = .62 | r = −0.45, P = .09 |
| Volume of long lateral section | r = −0.12, P = .74 | r = −0.12, P = .74 | r = 0.28, P = .42 |
| FA of long lateral section | r = 0.46, P = .18 | r = 0.46, P = .18 | r = 0.03, P = .95 |
| Volume of diencephalic section | r = 0.56, P = 0.09 | r = 0.56, P = .09 | r = −0.94, P = .80 |
| FA of diencephalic section | r = −0.40, P = .26 | r = 0.40, P = .26 | r = 0.20, P = .59 |
Note:—AC indicates audiometric classification; EC, electrophysiologic classification based on auditory brain stem responses.
↵a No significant correlations were found between tracking parameters and audiometric measurements, electrophysiologic measurements, or tumor size (ordinal scale according to tumor classification T2a–T4b).