Table 2:

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of collateral flow using time-resolved C-arm CBCTA data

CaseAcute Occlusion SiteFlow Direction of MCAaMeasuring PointDifference of Time-to-Peak (Lesion-Normal)bRelative Peak Density (Lesion/Normal)cScore of Tan et al13 (0–3)Score of Miteff et a114 (3-Point)Score of Maas et al4 (1–5)
1R-M1RProximal M210 sec (29–9)84.8% (302/356)3Good4
2L-M1RProximal M29 sec (31–13)60.1% (292/486)2Good2
3L-M1AProximal M21.5 sec (10–7)90.8% (364/401)3Good3
4R-ICA TRProximal M18.5 sec (34–17)58.6% (396/676)3Good3
5L-ICA and M1RProximal M28 sec (52–36)58.0% (341/588)1Good2
6L-ICAADistal M14 sec (64–56)62.8% (301/479)3Good3
7L-ICAADistal M12.5 sec (20–15)80.3% (309/385)3Good3
8R-M2NANANANANANANA
9R-M2NANANANANANANA
10BA and L-P1NANANANANANANA
  • Note:—R indicates right; L, left; NA, not applicable; BA, basilar artery; T, terminus.

  • a A indicates antegrade; R, retrograde.

  • b Data in parentheses are the frame differences for time-to-peak. Each frame represents 0.5 seconds.

  • c Data in parentheses are the Hounsfield units of measured points, which represent the level of enhancement of the vessel.