Factors affecting heterogeneity

Factor (No. of Studies)τ2χ2 (P)I2 (%)Mean Differences (95 % CI) Random
Studies without significant differences between grades II and III (n = 14)0.006.5 (.84)00.35 (0.01–0.69)
Oligodendroglial tumors (n = 3)0.042.17 (.34)81.95 (1.21–2.96)
Histogram rCBVmax (n = 3)0.102.88 (.24)310.45 (−0.17–1.08)
Published individual patient data (n = 10)0.2815.76 (<.001)431.82 (1.28–2.36)
Retrospective study design (n = 17)0.7052.34 (<.001)691.42 (0.89–1.96)
Astrocytic tumors (n = 6)1.5720.69 (<.001)762.28 (0.96–3.60)
Studies with significant differences between grades II and III (n = 16)0.7363.01 (<.001)762.37 (1.87–2.87)
Non-WHO 2007 classification (n = 17)0.8873.74 (<.001)781.71 (1.16–2.26)
No correction for contrast agent leakage according to Boxerman (n = 20)0.8886.07 (<.001)781.75 (1.24–2.25)
ROI analysis (n = 25)1.09116.10 (<.001)791.93 (1.43–2.44)
Studies published in 2010 or before (n = 14)1.0265.67 (<.001)801.81 (1.17–2.44)
No presaturation of tissue (n = 18)1.0584.70 (<.001)801.85 (1.27–2.43)
All studies (n = 28)1.16142.97 (<.001)811.76 (1.27–2.24)
3T (n = 10)1.6746.71 (<.001)811.66 (0.69–2.64)
Presaturation of tissue (n = 10)1.5353.21 (<.001)831.60 (0.68–2.15)
Studies published after 2010 (n = 14)1.5075.04 (<.001)831.70 (0.93–2.48)
1.5T (n = 16)1.1795.95 (<.001)841.83 (1.22–2.45)
WHO 2007 classification (n = 11)2.0768.39 (<.001)851.85 (0.85–2.86)
No published individual patient data (n = 18)1.54120.79 (.07)861.75 (1.07–2.42)
Blinded reference test evaluation (n = 5) QUADAS-21.1029.23 (<.001)861.30 (0.29–2.32)
Correction for leakage according to Boxerman (n = 8)2.5854.12 (<.001)871.83 (0.49–3.16)
Blinded index test evaluation (n = 14) QUADAS-21.5797.79 (<.001)871.77 (1.03–2.51)
Optimal flow and timing (n = 7) QUADAS-21.5749.31 (<.001)881.69 (0.57–2.80)
Prospective study design (n = 11)1.9489.9 (<.001)892.27 (1.35–3.20)