Table 2:

Disc degeneration in stressed and nonstressed segments of lumbar spine

Baseline DegenerationProgressive Degeneration
Stressed DiscsControl DiscsStressed DiscsControl Discs
Annular fissurea,b0.76 ± 0.350.37 ± 0.480.07 ± 0.180.05 ± 0.22
37 (88.1)16 (38.1)6 (14.3)2 (4.9)
Radial fissurea,b0.59 ± 0.430.17 ± 0.380.07 ± 0.180.05 ± 0.22
30 (71.4)8 (19.1)6 (14.3)2 (4.9)
Herniationa,b0.07 ± 0.200.00 ± 0.000.01 ± 0.080.00 ± 0.00
5 (11.9)0 (0.0)1 (2.4)0 (0.0)
Nuclear degenerationa,b,c0.13 ± 0.300.05 ± 0.220.10 ± 0.280.00 ± 0.00
8 (19.1)2 (4.8)5 (11.9)0 (0.0)
Nuclear SI lossa,b,d0.39 ± 0.420.12 ± 0.330.17 ± 0.480.00 ± 0.00
22 (52.4)5 (11.9)6 (14.3)0 (0.0)
EPDa,b0.11 ± 0.240.12 ± 0.330.00 ± 0.000.00 ± 0.00
8 (19.1)5 (11.9)0 (0.0)0 (0.0)
  • Note:—EPD indicates endplate burden; SI, signal intensity.

  • a Burden (mean ± SD) of degenerative parameter calculated on per disc basis.

  • b Number (%) of patients with specified degenerative parameters in stressed or control segments of lumbar spine; “Baseline Degeneration” refers to changes on MR scan obtained at the time of presentation and “Progressive Degeneration” refers to appearance of new changes noted on a follow-up MR scan obtained >6 months later.

  • c Defined as discs graded higher than 2 on Pfirrmann grading system.

  • d Discs graded higher than 1 on a 6-point scale based on SI on T2-weighted images indicating any loss of normal hyperintense signal.