Table 3:

Lobar GM and WM volume differences among HCs and subjects with RRMS and SPMS after adjusting for confounding factorsa

ParameterMedian (Interquartiles)P Value
HC (n = 19)RRMS (n = 19)SPMS (n = 19)RRMS vs HC (n = 19)SPMS vs HC (n = 19)SPMS vs RRMS (n = 19)
Gray matter
    Frontal lobe200.040 (190.352–167.944)199.248 (192.480–207.896)200.352 (193.500–207.540).69.60.22
    Parietal lobe90.296 (83.992–94.512)89.824 (85.048–95.176)93.368 (88.956–96.352).72.03.095
    Temporal lobe122.740 (110.640–130.560)121.336 (114.672–128.544)106.892 (99.432–112.928).86.0044b.0073b
    Occipital lobe101.088 (98.536–106.272)97.160 (95.728–102.960)72.792 (69.868–75.196).10.0030b.0033b
White matter
    Frontal lobe190.568 (170.368–201.528)170.316 (159.520–189.112)146.260 (134.908–157.136)<.0001b.0006b<.0001b
    Parietal lobe101.200 (94.536–109.152)93.272 (84.944–97.208)81.952 (77.736–87.532).0001b.0018b<.0001b
    Temporal lobe70.132 (56.648–79.352)68.512 (64.116–74.016)61.208 (51.576–71.720).026.98.0026b
    Occipital lobe32.024 (30.248–35.092)29.092 (24.136–33.768)26.864 (23.552–31.832).65.0098b.0003b
  • a Bonferroni-corrected P < .017 is considered statistically significant. Age was considered a confounding factor for comparing RRMS vs HC and SPMS vs HC; age, EDSS, and disease duration were considered confounding factors for comparing SPMS vs RRMS. All volumes are in cubic centimeters.

  • b Significant.