Table 1:

Clinical characteristics of 335 patients

CovariateEntire CohortOral TongueOther SubsiteaP Valueb
Total case No.335189 (56%)146 (44%)
Age (median) (range) (yr)62 (22–96)60 (22–96)64 (28–96.4).004c
Sex.260
    Female129 (39%)78 (41%)51 (35%)
    Male206 (61%)111 (59%)95 (65%)
Smoking PY (median) (range)10 (0–100)5 (0–100)20 (0–86)<.001c
pT Category (7th edition)<.001c
    T1119 (36%)47 (25%)72 (49%)
    T2161 (48%)101 (53%)60 (41%)
    T355 (16%)41 (22%)14 (10%)
pN Category (7th edition)<.001c
    N0181 (54%)83 (44%)98 (67%)
    pN+154 (46%)106 (56%)48 (33%)
pTT (median) (range) (cm)0.9 (0.1–4.0)1.1 (0.1–4.0)0.6 (0.1–3.9)<.001c
rTT (median) (range) (cm)1.0 (0.1–3.4)1.2 (0.1–3.0)0.6 (0.1–3.4)<.001c
rTT on CT (median) (range) (cm)1.0 (0.1–3.4)1.3 (0.1–2.7)0.7 (0.1–3.4)<.001c
rTT on MR (median) (range) (cm)1.2 (0.1–3.0)1.3 (0.1–3.0)0.3 (0.1–2.8)<.001c
rDOI on CT (median) (range) (cm)0.9 (0.0–3.1)1.3 (0.1–2.7)0.6 (0.0–3.1)<.001c
rDOI on MR (median) (range) (cm)1.1 (0.1–3.0)1.3 (0.1–3.0)0.3 (0.1–2.8)<.001c
  • Note:—PY indicates pack-year; pN+, pathologic-positive lymph nodes.

  • a Other oral cavity subsite included the following: n = 75, floor of mouth; n = 37, buccal mucosa; n = 16, lower alveolar and gingiva; n = 8, retromolar trigone; n = 6, upper alveolar and gingiva; n = 4, hard palate.

  • b P value was for comparison between oral tongue and other oral cavity subsites.

  • c Significant.