Table 2:

CS-SENSE and conventional MRI sequence qualitative evaluation

MetricSAG FLAIR (n = 70 Reads)SPGR (n = 68 Reads)
AcquisitionaDifferenceAcquisitionaDifference
CS-SENSEConventionalMean(95% CI)P ValueCS-SENSEConventionalMean(95% CI)P Value
Optimal image quality19 (27.1)19 (27.1)0.0%(−510.0–10.0)>.9934 (50.0)25 (36.8)13.2%(−5.7–31.8).15
Optimal SNR6 (8.6)5 (7.1)1.4%(−55.7–8.6).6727 (39.7)24 (35.3)4.4%(−59.7–18.2).55
No or trace artifacts52 (74.3)60 (85.7)−511.4%(−524.3–0.0).06846 (67.6)37 (54.4)13.2%(−53.0–28.6).11
Sharp gray-white matter boundaries36 (51.4)39 (55.7)−54.3%(−512.9–4.3).3627 (39.7)26 (38.2)2.2%(−58.1–12.2).67
Sharp lesion boundaries57 (86.4)55 (83.3)2.3%(−57.1–11.7).6552 (83.9)52 (83.9)0.8%(−58.6–10.0).84
  • Note:—SAG indicates sagittal.

  • a Values are No. (%) where higher percentages indicate a higher prevalence of good image quality.