Table 2:

Regional volumes and mean intensity values for MRI parametersa

WMLPenumbra (0–2 mm)Penumbra (2–4 mm)dNAWMRegression Coefficient
Mean volume (cm3)0.738 (0.842)2.78 (2.26)5.81 (4.21)219 (3.68)NA
[0.661–0.815][2.57–2.99][5.43–6.19][186–253]
FLAIR intensity136 (10.1)98.9 (3.50)79.4 (3.71)70.8 (2.58)−0.854
[135–137][98.6–99.2][79.1–79.7][70.6–71.0]
T1 intensity116 (6.43)132 (5.80)142 (4.50)156 (1.31)0.824
[115–117][132–133][142–142][156–156]
T2 intensity115 (8.62)88.3 (6.82)74.1 (4.75)60.6 (1.02)−0.734
[114–115][87.7–88.9][73.7–74.5][60.5–60.7]
FA0.279 (0.0554)0.328 (0.0411)0.374 (0.0380)0.384 (0.0254)0.630
[0.273–0.284][0.324–0.331][0.371–0.377][0.382–0.386]
MD (10−3)3.68 (0.662)3.23 (0.445)2.97 (0.344)2.33 (0.112)−0.578
[3.62–3.73][3.19–3.27][2.93–3.00][2.32–2.34]
CBF (mL/100 g/min)25.2 (10.3)26.9 (9.37)28.8 (9.06)34.4 (8.56)0.306
[24.3–26.1][26.1–27.7][28.0–29.6][33.6–35.2]
VR0.776 (0.493)0.779 (0.379)0.790 (0.328)0.681 (0.377)0.192
(Mean % change)[0.731–0.821][0.745–0.813][0.760–0.820][0.647–0.715]
  • Note:—NA indicates not applicable.

  • a SD is in parentheses, and 95% confidence intervals for intensity parameters are in brackets. Kruskal-Wallis tests were significant for all parameters, and pair-wise comparisons had P < .001 except that the WML and penumbral ROIs did not show significant differences in VR. The slope of linear regression across the 4 regions for intensity variables using a median value is shown in the last column; regression analyses were all statistically significant with P < .001.