Table 2:

Relationship between BRAF mutation and US imaging characteristics by visual assessment of papillary thyroid carcinomas

BRAF (+) PTC (n =48)BRAF (−) PTC (n =48)P Value
Internal content.16
 Solid46 (95.8)41 (85.4)
 Predominantly solid2 (4.2)7 (14.6)
Echogenicity.012
 Markedly hypoechoic20 (41.7)8 (16.7)
 Hypoechoic23 (47.9)26 (54.2)
 Isoechoic5 (10.4)13 (27.1)
 Hyperechoic0 (0.0)1 (2.1)
Shape.08
 Irregular12 (25.0)20 (41.7)
 Round to oval36 (75.0)28 (58.3)
Orientation.007
 Nonparallel26 (54.2)13 (27.1)
 Parallel22 (45.8)35 (72.9)
Margin.66
 Spiculated/microlobulated35 (72.9)31 (64.6)
 Ill-defined4 (8.3)6 (12.5)
 Smooth9 (18.8)11 (22.9)
Calcification.33
 No18 (37.5)16 (33.3)
 Microcalcification19 (39.6)22 (45.8)
 Macrocalcification6 (12.5)9 (18.8)
 Rim calcification5 (10.4)1 (2.1)
Final K-TIRADS category.004
 3 (Low suspicion)1 (2.1)3 (6.3)
 4 (Intermediate suspicion)9 (18.8)22 (45.8)
 5 (High suspicion)38 (79.2)23 (47.9)