Regular Article
Molecular Crowding and Viscosity as Determinants of Translational Diffusion of Metabolites in Subcellular Organelles

https://doi.org/10.1006/abbi.1998.1051Get rights and content

Abstract

The role of molecular crowding and viscosity on the apparent translational diffusion coefficient (ADC) of small metabolites was investigated in different subcellular organelles using the pulse-field gradient spin-echo1H NMR technique. ADCs of metabolites with increasing radius of gyration (0.7 Å <RG< 4.5 Å) were measured in the cytoplasm of rat or chicken erythrocytes, in the nucleus of chicken erythrocytes, and in isolated rat liver mitochondria. Metabolite ADCs in these systems were compared with the corresponding ADCs determined in model solutions of increasing bulk viscosity but different molecular crowding. For solutions having the same viscosity, metabolite ADCs decreased with increasing concentration of cosolutes. This effect is adequately described by the modified Stokes–Einstein relationship, ADC =k/RG(1 + 2.5Φ), wherekis a constant for a given temperature and Φ is an obstruction factor reporting the fractional volume of solution occupied by cosolutes, a measure of the molecular crowding in the solution. Cytoplasmic values of Φ for metabolites of different sizes did not depend exclusively on metaboliteRGbut on additional factors including the chemical nature of the metabolite, the presence of diffusional barriers, and metabolite-specific binding sites. In the case of water, nuclear Φ values approached those of the extracellular space while mitochondrial Φ values were significantly higher than those of the cytoplasm. Taken together, these results reveal important differences in molecular crowding within the different subcellular compartments, suggesting considerable diffusional heterogeneity for small metabolites within the different intracellular organelles.

References (35)

  • P. Srere

    Trends Biochem. Sci.

    (1994)
  • K. Luby-Phelps

    Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.

    (1994)
  • K. Luby-Phelps et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1993)
  • M. Arrio-Dupont et al.

    Biophys. J.

    (1996)
  • S. Gil et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem.

    (1994)
  • O. Söderman et al.

    Prog. NMR Spectrosc.

    (1994)
  • E.A. López-Beltrán et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1996)
  • J.E. Tanner

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1983)
  • P. López et al.

    J. Mol. Struct.

    (1996)
  • A. Srivastava et al.

    Arch. Biochem. Biophys.

    (1997)
  • J.S. Schoeniger et al.

    Br. J. Magn. Reson. B

    (1994)
  • A. Fersht

    Enzyme Structure and Mechanism

    (1977)
  • J.S. Clegg

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1984)
  • S.B. Zimmerman et al.

    Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct.

    (1993)
  • H.P. Kao et al.

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1993)
  • O. Seksek et al.

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1997)
  • K. Fushimi et al.

    J. Cell Biol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (78)

    • In-cell NMR: Why and how?

      2022, Progress in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Darley-Usmar, V. M.Rickwood, D.Wilson, M. T.

    1

    To whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed. Fax: 34-91-585-4587. E-mail:[email protected].

    View full text