Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 7, Issue 2, February 1998, Pages 108-118
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Nonlinear Aspects of the BOLD Response in Functional MRI

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0316Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) using blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) contrast has progressed rapidly and is commonly used to study function in many regions of the human brain. This paper introduces a method for characterizing the linear or nonlinear properties of the hemodynamic response. Such characterization is essential for accurate prediction of time-course behavior. Linearity of the BOLD response was examined in the primary visual cortex for manipulations of the stimulus amplitude and duration. Stimuli of 1, 2, 4, and 8 s duration (80% contrast) and 10, 20, 40, and 80% contrast (4 s duration) were used to test the hemodynamic response. Superposition of the obtained responses was performed to determine if the BOLD response is nonlinear. The nonlinear characteristics of the BOLD response were assessed using a Laplacian linear system model cascaded with a broadening function. Discrepancies between the model and the observed response provide an indirect measure of the nonlinearity of the response. The Laplacian linear system remained constant within subjects so the broadening function can be used to absorb nonlinearities in the response. The results show that visual stimulation under 4 s in duration and less than 40% contrast yield strong nonlinear responses.

References (30)

  • M.S. Cohen

    Parametric analysis of fMRI data using linear system methods

    NeuroImage

    (1997)
  • J.M. Maisog et al.

    Multivariate multiple regression on fMRI data to map functionally distinct areas

    Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain

    (1996)
  • P.A. Bandettini et al.

    Timecourse EPI of human brain function during task activation

    Magn Reson Med

    (1992)
  • J.W. Belliveau et al.

    Functional mapping of the human visual cortex by magnetic resonance imaging

    Science

    (1991)
  • G.M. Boynton et al.

    Linear systems analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging in human V1

    J. Neurosci.

    (1996)
  • R.B. Buxton et al.

    A biomechanical contribution of the BOLD signal time course: The balloon model

    Proceedings of the Fifth International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Conference

    (1997)
  • S.M. Courtney et al.

    Relative contributions of occipital, temporal and frontal cortex to visual perception and working memory: A fMRI study

    Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain

    (1996)
  • A.M. Dale et al.

    Selective averaging of individual trials using FMRI.In

    Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Functional Mapping of the Human Brain

    (1997)
  • T.L. Davis et al.

    Susceptibility contrast undershoot is not matched by inflow contrast undershoot

    Proceedings of the Society Magnetic Resonance, 2nd Annual Meeting

    (1994)
  • S.A. Engel et al.

    fMRI of human visual cortex

    Nature

    (1994)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Stimulus rate dependence of regional cerebral blood flow in human striate cortex, demonstrated by positron emission tomography

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1984)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Mapping of human visual cortex with positron emission tomography

    Nature

    (1986)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects

    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1986)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Nonoxidative glucose consumption during focal physiology neural activity

    Science

    (1992)
  • Cited by (283)

    • Imaging faster neural dynamics with fast fMRI: A need for updated models of the hemodynamic response

      2021, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      While this may be viewed as a nonlinearity in that the HDR for the single stimulus cannot predict the HDR for the second stimulus of the pair, it may also be viewed as a violation of time-invariance in that the HDR for a given stimulus depends on when the stimulus is presented, and therefore this refractory effect indicates that the HDR can change with time when using short inter-stimulus intervals. The most commonly considered form of nonlinearity that is perhaps the most relevant for fast fMRI is the violation of the additivity property, which can be seen readily as a disproportionately large BOLD response to short-duration stimuli (Birn and Bandettini, 2005; de Zwart et al., 2009; Glover, 1999; Hirano et al., 2011; Janz et al., 2001; Liu and Gao, 2000; Miller et al., 2001; Nangini et al., 2005; Pfeuffer et al., 2003; Robson et al., 1998; Soltysik et al., 2004; Vazquez and Noll, 1998; Wager et al., 2005; Yeşilyurt et al., 2008), which we will refer to as amplitude effects. In addition, the temporal properties of the HDR are different for short-duration stimuli compared to long-duration stimuli: the HDR to brief stimuli is faster than predicted from the linear system (Lewis et al., 2018b, 2016; Liu and Gao, 2000; Pfeuffer et al., 2003; Soltysik et al., 2004; Vazquez and Noll, 1998; Yeşilyurt et al., 2008), which we will refer to as temporal effects.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    B. A. Carlson

    View full text