Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 10, Issue 6, December 1999, Pages 642-657
NeuroImage

Regular Article
Overt Verbal Responding during fMRI Scanning: Empirical Investigations of Problems and Potential Solutions

https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1999.0500Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a pair of studies designed to empirically explore the severity of potential artifacts associated with overt verbal responding during fMRI scanning and to examine several different solutions to these artifacts. In Study One, we compared susceptibility artifacts, signal-to-noise ratios, and activation patterns when overt versus covert verbal responses were elicited during fMRI scanning, using both individual and group analyses. The results indicated that different patterns of brain activation were elicited during covert as compared to overt verbal responses. This suggests that covert responses cannot be used as a simple substitute for overt verbal responses. Further, the results suggested that the use of overt verbal responses during fMRI scanning can produce interpretable results if: (1) the primary comparison is between two conditions that both use overt verbal responses, and (2) analyses are conducted on pooled group data rather than individual participant data. In Study Two, we evaluated the feasibility and validity of a method for acquiring participants' overt responses during fMRI scanning. The results indicated that our method was very accurate in acquiring the content of participant's responses. Further, inspection of the responses demonstrated that participants do not always comply with task instructions and highlighted the importance of obtaining behavioral performance measures during fMRI scanning.

References (35)

  • J.D. Cohen

    Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task

    Nature

    (1997)
  • S.W.G. Derbyshire

    Pain and Stroop interference tasks activate separate processing modules in anterior cingulate cortex

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • W.B. Edmister

    Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1999)
  • S.D. Forman

    Improved assessment of significant activation in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI): Use of a cluster-size threshold

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1995)
  • K.J. Friston

    Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1996)
  • M.S. George

    Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop)

    J. Neuropsych.

    (1997)
  • A.N. Herbster

    Regional cerebral blood flow during word and nonword reading

    Hum. Brain Map.

    (1997)
  • Cited by (167)

    • ICA-based denoising strategies in breath-hold induced cerebrovascular reactivity mapping with multi echo BOLD fMRI

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      It is important that the signal variance associated with these confounding signals is accounted for and minimized during preprocessing or data analyses (Caballero-Gaudes and Reynolds, 2017; Liu, 2016). Head motion is a particularly problematic source of noise for task-based fMRI experiments, mainly in block designs (Johnstone et al., 2006) and in particular experimental paradigms, such as in overt speech production (Barch et al., 1999; Soltysik and Hyde, 2006; Xu et al., 2014). This concern with task-induced movement artefacts extends to respiration tasks: the experimental design is similar to that of block designs, but the amount of motion associated with paced breathing, deep breaths, or “recovery” breaths following a BH task can be very prominent and concur with the pattern of the task.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text