Skip to main content
Log in

The diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy in patients with low back pain

  • Articles
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bone scintigraphy has been studied in two groups of patients presenting with low back pain. In one group of 38 patients suffering “nonspecific” back pain, bone scintigraphy and laboratory findings were negative in 24. There were abnormal laboratory findings in all of the remaining 14 and 7 had positive bone scans indicative of clinically significant disease. Selection of patients for bone scintigraphy in this group should therefore be influenced by abnormal laboratory findings and elevation of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate in particular. By comparison, the bone scans were reviewed from another group of patients suffering previously known malignancy. Out of 138 patients, nearly 40% showed a positive bone scan due to subsequently proven metastasis. Bone scintigraphy was positive in a further 14% as a result of osteoporotic rib fracture and vertebral body collapse. In half of these, it was not possible to exclude malignancy by scintigraphy. The present findings indicate that bone scintigraphy is not a useful procedure in patients with long-standing low back pain who have normal radiographs and normal laboratory findings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berghs H, Remans U, Drieskens L (1978) Diagnostic value of sacro-iliac joint scintigraphy with Tc99m pyrophosphate in sacro-iliitis. Ann Rheum Dis 37:190

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chalmers IM, Lentle BC, Percy JS, Russell AS (1979) Sacro-iliitis detected by bone scintigraphy: A clinical, radiological and scintigraphic follow-up study. Ann Rheum Dis 38:112

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dequeker J, Goddeeris T, Walravens M, De Roo M (1978) Evaluation of sacro-iliitis. Comparison of radiologic and radionuclide techniques. Radiology 128:687

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gelfand MJ, Strife JL, Kereiakes JG (1981) Radionuclide bone imaging in spondylolysis of the lumbar spine in children. Radiology 140:191

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldberg RP, Genant HK, Shimshak R, Shames D (1978) Applications and limitations of quantitative sacroiliac joint scintigraphy. Radiology 128:683

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hall FM (1980) Back pain and the radiologist. Radiology 137:861

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johansen TP, Forsgreen J, Hansen HH (1980) Bone scanning in lumbar disc herniation. Acta Orthop Scand 51:617

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lentle BC, Russell AS, Percy JS, Jackson FI (1977) Scintigraphic findings in ankylosing spondylitis. J Nucl Med 18:524

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez-Majano V, Miskew DBW (1980) Sacro-iliac joint disease in drug abusers. The role of bone scintigraphy. Eur J Nucl Med 5:459

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lugon M, Torode AS, Travers RL, Amaral H, Lavender JP, Hughes GRV (1979) Sacro-iliac joint scanning with technetium 99mdiphosphonate. Rheumatol Rehabil 18:131

    Google Scholar 

  11. Majd M (1978) Bone scintigraphy in children with obscure skeletal pain. Ann Radiol (Paris) 22:85

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mallens WMC, Pauwels EKJ, Tettero QF (1977) Bone scintigraphy as a guide to the diagnosis of osteoid osteoma. Radiologia Clin 46:300

    Google Scholar 

  13. McNeil BJ, Polak JF (1981) An update on the rationale for the use of bone scans in selected metastatic and primary bone tumors. In: Pauwels EKJ, Schütte HE, Taconis WK (eds) Bone scintigraphy Mart. Nijhoff, Boston The Hague London, p 187

    Google Scholar 

  14. Micheli LJ (1979) Low back pain in the adolescent, differential diagnosis. Am J Sports Med 7:262

    Google Scholar 

  15. Oyamada H, Teni S, Fukama H (1980) Clinical significance of abnormal accumulations in the vertebrae on the bone scintigrams of cancer patients. Tohoku J Exp Med 130:341

    Google Scholar 

  16. Park WM, Spencer DG, McCall IW, Ward DJ, Buchanan WW, Stephens WH (1981) The detection of pseudarthrosis in ankylosing spondylitis. Br J Radiol 54:467

    Google Scholar 

  17. Resnick D, Williamson S, Alazraki N (1981) Focal spinal abnormalities on bone scans in ankylosing spondylitis — a clue to the presence of fracture or pseudoarthrosis. Clin Nucl Med 6:213

    Google Scholar 

  18. Schaffer DL, Pendergrass HP (1976) Comparison of enzymes, radiographs and radionuclide methods of detecting bone metastases from carcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 121:431

    Google Scholar 

  19. Schütte HE (1979) The influence of bone pain on the results of bone scans. Cancer 44:2039

    Google Scholar 

  20. Smith FW, Gilday DL (1980) Scintigraphic appearance of osteoid osteoma. Radiology 137:191

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spencer DG, Adams FG, Horton PW, Buchanan WW (1979) Scintiscanning in ankylosing spondylitis: A clinical, radiographical and quantitative radio-isotope study. J Rheumatol 6:426

    Google Scholar 

  22. Vyas K, Eklem FG, Seto H, Bobba VR, Brown P, Haines J, Krishnamurthy GT (1981) Quantitative scintigraphy of sacro-iliac joints, effects of age, gender, and laterality. AJR 136:589

    Google Scholar 

  23. Weissberg DL, Resnick D, Taylor A, Becker MS, Alazraki N (1978) Rheumatoid arthritis and its variant: Analysis of scintiphotographic radiographic and clinical examinations. AJR 131:665

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wickenhauser J (1978) Die Skelettszintigraphie in der neuroradiologischen Diagnostik. Neuroradiology 16:354

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Deceased on April 22, 1983

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schütte, H.E., Park, W.M. The diagnostic value of bone scintigraphy in patients with low back pain. Skeletal Radiol 10, 1–4 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355381

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355381

Key words

Navigation