Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

TrueFISP of the Pediatric Pineal Gland

Volumetric and Microstructural Analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Although high-resolution 3D-imaging has markedly improved the imaging of the pediatric pineal gland, the prevalences of typical and atypical cysts as well as in vivo volumes are unknown.

The purpose of this study was to compare the frequency of typical and atypical cysts using high-resolution 3D-sequence true fast imaging with steady state precession (trueFISP) and standard sequences and to directly measure the pineal volume in a large pediatric population.

Methods

In 54 consecutively examined children (age 0–17 years, mean age 5.4 ± 5.6 years, 44% female, 56% male) the prevalence of typical and atypical cysts (thickened rim, trabeculations, asymmetry) was determined using trueFISP (isotropic, 0.8 mm) and standard sequences, 1.5-T, T1-weighted spin echo (T1-SE), T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2-TSE) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR). Indistinct findings were noted separately. Volumetry was based on the trueFISP datasets. Solid and cystic compartments were approached separately. The pineal volume was correlated to gender and age.

Results

The detected frequency of pineal cysts was higher in trueFISP (57.4%) than in standard sequences (T1-SE 7.4%, T2-TSE 14.8%, and FLAIR 13.0%). In trueFISP 66.3% of the detected cysts were classified as atypical (standard sequences 0%). Indistinct findings were lowest in trueFISP. The mean pineal volume was 94.3 ± 159.1 mm³ and no gender related differences were found. Age and volume showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.382) which was remarkably higher in completely solid glands (r = 0.659).

Conclusions

TrueFISP imaging improves the detection of pineal cysts in children. A typical cysts are frequently detected as an incidental finding. Volumetric analysis of the pediatric pineal gland is feasible and reveals enormous variation. Whereas gender effects are negligible, the pineal volume in children is dependant on age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hasegawa A, Mori W. Morphometry of the human pineal gland: relationship to the adrenal cortex. Acta Pathol Jpn. 1980;30(3):407–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Tapp E. The human pineal gland in malignancy. J Neural Transm. 1980;48(2):119–29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Tapp E, Huxley M. The weight and degree of calcification of the pineal gland. J Pathol. 1971;105(1):31–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Tapp E, Huxley M. The histological appearance of the human pineal gland from puberty to old age. J Pathol. 1972;108(2):137–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmitz SA, Platzek I, Kunz D, Mahlberg R, Wolf KJ, Heidenreich JO. Computed tomography of the human pineal gland for study of the sleep-wake rhythm: reproducibility of a semi-quantitative approach. Acta Radiol. 2006;47(8):865–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sener RN. The pineal gland: a comparative MR imaging study in children and adults with respect to normal anatomical variations and pineal cysts. Pediatr Radiol. 1995;25(4):245–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sumida M, Barkovich AJ, Newton TH. Development of the pineal gland: measurement with MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(2):233–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nolte I, Brockmann MA, Gerigk L, Groden C, Scharf J. TrueFISP imaging of the pineal gland: more cysts and more abnormalities. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2010;112(3):204–8. doi:s0303-8467(09)00307-2 [pii] 10.1016/j.clineuro.2009.11.010.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nölte I, Lütkhoff AT, Stuck BA, Lemmer B, Schredl M, Findeisen P, et al. Pineal volume and circadian melatonin profile in healthy volunteers: an interdisciplinary approach. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(3):499–505. doi:10.1002/jmri.21872.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pu Y, Mahankali S, Hou J, Li J, Lancaster JL, Gao JH, et al. High prevalence of pineal cysts in healthy adults demonstrated by high-resolution, noncontrast brain MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28(9):1706–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun B, Wang D, Tang Y, Fan L, Lin X, Yu T, et al. The pineal volume: a three-dimensional volumetric study in healthy young adults using 3.0 T MR data. Int J Dev Neurosci. 2009;27(7):655–60. doi:s0736-5748(09)00117-8 [pii] 10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2009.08.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hasegawa A, Ohtsubo K, Mori W. Pineal gland in old age; quantitative and qualitative morphological study of 168 human autopsy cases. Brain Res. 1987;409(2):343–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Golan J, Torres K, Staskiewicz GJ, Opielak G, Maciejewski R. Morphometric parameters of the human pineal gland in relation to age, body weight and height. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2002;61(2):111–3.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rodin AE, Overall J. Statistical relationships of weight of the human pineal to age and malignancy. Cancer. 1967;20(8):1203–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee DH, Norman D, Newton TH. MR imaging of pineal cysts. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11(4):586–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandera M, Marcol W, Bierzynska-Macyszyn G, Kluczewska E. Pineal cysts in childhood. Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19(10–11):750–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schmidt F, Penka B, Trauner M, Reinsperger L, Ranner G, Ebner F, et al. Lack of pineal growth during childhood. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80(4):1221–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mamourian AC, Towfighi J. Pineal cysts: MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1986;7(6):1081–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Golzarian J, Baleriaux D, Bank WO, Matos C, Flament-Durand J. Pineal cyst: normal or pathological? Neuroradiology. 1993;35(4):251–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Inoue Y, Saiwai S, Miyamoto T, Katsuyama J. Enhanced high-resolution sagittal MRI of normal pineal glands. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994;18(2):182–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pastel DA, Mamourian AC, Duhaime AC. Internal structure in pineal cysts on high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: not a sign of malignancy. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2009;4(1):81–4. doi:10.3171/2008.5.17681 [pii] 10.3171/2008.5.17681.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Barboriak DP, Lee L, Provenzale JM. Serial MR imaging of pineal cysts: implications for natural history and follow-up. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176(3):737–43.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Cooper E. The human pineal gland and pineal cysts. J Anatom. 1932;67:28–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Engel U, Gottschalk S, Niehaus L, Lehmann R, May C, Vogel S et al. Cystic lesions of the pineal region—MRI and pathology. Neuroradiology. 2000;42(6):399–402.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hajdu SI, Porro RS, Lieberman PH, Foote FW Jr. Degeneration of the pineal gland of patients with cancer. Cancer. 1972;29(3):706–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Megyeri L. Cystic changes in the pineal body. Frankf Z Pathol. 1960;70:699–704.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Caldas JG, Doyon D, Lederman H, Carlier R. Magnetic resonance study of the pineal region. Normal pineal gland and simple cysts. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 1998;56(2):237–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Katzman GL, Dagher AP, Patronas NJ. Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging from 1000 asymptomatic volunteers. JAMA. 1999;282(1):36–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lum GB, Williams JP, Machen BC, Akkaraju V. Benign cystic pineal lesions by magnetic resonance imaging. J Comput Tomogr. 1987;11(3):228–35.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Mamourian A, Towfighi J. MR of pineal cysts. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1994;15(9):1796–7.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Petitcolin V, Garcier JM, Mohammedi R, Ravel A, Mofid R, Viallet JF, et al. Prevalence and morphology of pineal cysts discovered at pituitary MRI: review of 1844 examinations. J Radiol. 2002;83(2 Pt 1):141–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Warmuth-Metz M, Bison B, Leykamm S. Neuroradiologic review in pediatric brain tumor studies. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(4):263–73. doi:1007/s00062-009-9029-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hattingen E, Blasel S, Nichtweiss M, Zanella FE, Weidauer S. MR imaging of midbrain pathologies. Clin Neuroradiol. 2010;20(2):81–97. doi:1007/s00062-010-0009-6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Briellmann RS, Syngeniotis A, Jackson GD. Comparison of hippocampal volumetry at 1.5 T and at 3 T. Epilepsia. 2001;42(8):1021–4. doi:epi02201 [pii].

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Horinek D, Brezova V, Nimsky C, Belsan T, Martinkovic L, Masopust V, et al. The MRI volumetry of the posterior fossa and its substructures in trigeminal neuralgia: a validated study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2009;151(6):669–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Hentschel F, von Kummer R. Response of the German Society of Neuroradiology to the guideline: “Ethically Appropriate Reaction to Incidental Imaging Findings in Brain Research”, suggested by Thomas Heinemann, Institut fur Wissenschaft und Ethik, and Christian Hoppe, Klinik fur Epileptologie, Universitat Bonn, Germany, on January 9, 2009. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(2):108–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Heinemann T, Hoppe C, Weber B, Elger CE. Ethically appropriate handling of incidental findings in human neuroimaging research: letter to the guest editorial of Frank Hentschel and Rudiger von Kummer [2]. Klin Neuroradiol. 2009;19(3):242–3; author reply 4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Waldhauser F, Kovacs J, Reiter E. Age-related changes in melatonin levels in humans and its potential consequences for sleep disorders. Exp Gerontol. 1998;33(7–8):759–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University Hospital Mannheim, Department of Neuroradiology, Mannheim, Germany

    J. M. Bumb, M. A. Brockmann, C. Groden, M. Al-Zghloul & I. Nölte

  2. Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Department of Neuroradiology, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3, 68167, Mannheim, Germany

    I. Nölte

Authors
  1. J. M. Bumb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. A. Brockmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. Groden
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. M. Al-Zghloul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. I. Nölte
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Nölte.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bumb, J., Brockmann, M., Groden, C. et al. TrueFISP of the Pediatric Pineal Gland. Clin Neuroradiol 22, 69–77 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-011-0110-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-011-0110-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation