Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA) for the identification of recently ruptured cerebral aneurysms. We studied 23 aneurysms in 18 patients (age range 34–72 years) with aneurysms of the anterior (n=17) and posterior (n=6) circulation by comparing 3D time-of-flight (TOF), contrast-enhanced MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA). In four of 23 aneurysms, 3D-TOF did not show the lesion. Contrast-enhanced MRA successfully depicted all aneurysms except one. T1 contamination artefacts from subarachnoid or intraparenchymal haemorrhages were evident on the 3D-TOF images in six cases. The artefacts were completely eliminated on the contrast-enhanced MRA images by subtraction of the pre-contrast images. The diagnostic information in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhages (SAHs) provided by contrast-enhanced MRA was comparable to that provided by DSA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hessel SJ, Adams DF, Abrams HL (1981) Complications of angiography. Radiology 138:273–281

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Heiserman JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA, et al (1994) Neurological complications of cerebral angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 15:1401–1407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, Farb RI, Tomlinson G, Montanera W (2003) Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 227:522–528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Adams WM, Laitt RD, Jackson A (2000) The role of MR angiography in the pretreatment assessment of intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1618–1628

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jäger HR, Ellamushi H, Moore EA, Grieve JP, Kitchen ND, Taylor WJ (2000) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial giant aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1900–1907

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilms G, Demaerel P, Bosmans H, Marchal G (1999) MRI of non-ischemic vascular disease: aneurysms and vascular malformations. Eur Radiol 9:1055–1060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Strada L, Patay Z, Scotti G (1998) Intracranial vascular malformations. Eur Radiol 8:685–690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ruggieri PM, Laub GA, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT (1989) Intracranial circulation: pulse-sequence considerations in three-dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 171:785–791

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ross JS, Masaryk TJ, Modic MT, Ruggieri PM, Haacke EM, Selman WR (1990) Intracranial aneurysms: evaluation by MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 11:449–455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huston J, Rufenacht DA, Ehamm RL, Wiebers DO (1991) Intracranial aneurysms and vascular malformations: comparison of time-of-flight and phase contrast MR angiography. Radiology 181:721–730

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Edelman RR, Sungkee SA, Chien D (1992) Improved time-of-flight MR angiography of the brain with magnetization transfer contrast. Radiology 184:395–399

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Metens T, Rio F, Balèriaux D, Roger T, David P, Rodesch G (2000) Intracranial aneurysms: detection with gadolinium-enhanced dynamic three-dimensional MR angiography—initial results. Radiology 216:39–46

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki M, Matsui O, Ueda F, et al (2002) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (enhanced 3-D fast gradient echo) for diagnosis of cerebral aneurysms. Neuroradiology 44:17–20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, Pruvo JP (1999) Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 41:867–874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Takano K, Utsunomiya H, Ono H, Okazaki M, Tanaka A (1999) Dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR angiography in intracranial vascular abnormalities. Eur Radiol 9:1909–1912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Prince MR (1994) Gadolinium-enhanced MR aortography. Radiology 191:155–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al (1998) Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1241–1244

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker D, Tsuruda J, Goodrich C, Alexander A, Buswell H (1998) Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of cerebral arteries. Invest Radiol 33:560–572

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G (1998) Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudoocclusion: first-pass gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography—preliminary study. Radiology 209:95–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hunt WE, Hess RM (1968) Surgical risk as related to time of intervention in the repair of intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 28:14–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fisher CM, Kistler JP, Davis JM (1980) Relation of cerebral vasospasm to subarachnoid hemorrhage visualized by computerized tomographic scanning. Neurosurgery 6:1–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ida M, Kurisu Y, Yamashita M (1997) MR angiography of ruptured aneurysms in acute subarachnoid hemorrhage. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:1025–1032

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ronkainen A, Puranen MI, Hemesniemi JA, et al (1995) Intracranial aneurysms: MR angiographic screening in 400 asymptomatic individuals with increased familial risk. Radiology 195:35–40

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Anzalone N, Triulzi F, Scotti G (1995) Acute subarachnoid haemorrhage: 3D time-of-flight MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital angiography. Neuroradiology 37:257–261

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. White PM, Teasdale EM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V (2001) Intracranial aneurysms: CT angiography and MR angiography for detection-prospective blinded comparison in a large patient cohort. Radiology 219:739–749

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gönner F, Heid O, Remonda L, et al (1998) MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1324–1328

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, Masaryk AM, Strother CM (1997) MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:279–286

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bradley WG Jr, Schmidt PG (1985) Effect of methemoglobin formation on the MR appearance of subarachnoid hemorrhage. Radiology 156:99–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marchal G, Michiels J, Bosmans H, Hecke PV (1992) Contrast-enhanced MRA of the brain. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:25–29

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Okumura A, Araki Y, Nishimura Y, et al (2001) The clinical utility of contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography for cerebrovascular disease. Neurol Res 23:767–771

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Levy RA, Maki JM (1998) Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the extracranial arteries: two techniques. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:688–690

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Leclerc X, Navez JF, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP (2002) Aneurysms of the anterior communicating artery treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:1121–1127

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al (2000) Software-triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the intracranial arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174:371–375

    Google Scholar 

  34. Anthony MM, Frayne R, Unal O, Rappe AH, Strother CM (2000) Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1523–1528

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Boulin A, Pierot L (2001) Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography. Radiology 219:108–113

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anzalone N, Righi C, Simionato F et al (2000) Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:746–752

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Rinkel GJE, Djibuti M, Algra A, van Gijn J (1998) Prevalence and risk of rupture of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review. Stroke 29:251–256

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. White PM, Wardlaw JM, Easton V (2000) Can noninvasive imaging accurately depict intracranial aneurysms? A systematic review. Radiology 217:361–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ercument Unlu.

Additional information

The contents of this article were presented as a poster entitled “Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of intracranial aneurysms” at the 28th annual meeting of the European Society of Neuroradiology (ESNR), Istanbul, Turkey, 11–14 September 2003

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Unlu, E., Cakir, B., Gocer, B. et al. The role of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of recently ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a comparative study. Neuroradiology 47, 780–791 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1424-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-005-1424-2

Keywords

Navigation