Skip to main content
Log in

Assessment of Matrix coils in a canine model of a large bifurcation aneurysm

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Controversy exists as to whether Matrix coils are an improvement over bare platinum coils in preventing aneurysm recanalization in endosaccularly coiled large aneurysms. We investigated Matrix coils in a dog model of a wide-necked large bifurcation aneurysm.

Methods

Six experimental aneurysms were created in dogs and these aneurysms were endosaccularly coiled with 100% Matrix coils. Angiographic and histopathological data were analyzed at 2 weeks and at 3 months.

Results

Average aneurysm dimensions were length 17.8 mm, width 8.3 mm, and neck 6.2 mm. Aneurysm coil filling ranged 24.1–41.8% by volume. At 14 days, three of six Matrix-treated aneurysms showed coil compaction and aneurysm recanalization. At 3 months, one additional Matrix-treated aneurysm showed delayed coil compaction and aneurysm recanalization. At 3 months, in three harvested aneurysms, the average measured neck neointima was 0.150 ± 0.14 mm. However, in two of the three aneurysms harvested at 3 months, aneurysm recanalization had occurred with neointimal tissue not completely covering the aneurysm orifice. Thick connective fibrous intercoil tissue was observed. No immediate or delayed thrombus formation had occurred.

Conclusion

Based on limited data in an experimental bifurcation aneurysm in dogs, Matrix coils appear to induce a thicker aneurysm neck neointima tissue and intercoil granulation response but appear prone to coil compaction and aneurysm recanalization. Modifications to the Matrix coil are likely needed to improve angiographic results in large aneurysms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I et al (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 360:1267–1274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Yu LM et al (2005) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 366:809–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G et al (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg 98:959–966

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Murayama Y, Vinuela F, Tateshima S, Song JK, Gonzalez NR, Wallace MP (2001) Bioabsorbable polymeric material coils for embolization of intracranial aneurysms: a preliminary experimental study. J Neurosurg 94:454–463

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lubicz B, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP (2005) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms with Matrix coils: a preliminary study of immediate post-treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:373–375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Linfante I, Akkawi N, Perlow A, Andreone V, Wakhloo A (2005) Polyglycolide/polylactide-coated platinum coils for patients with ruptured and unruptured cerebral aneurysms. A single-center experience. Stroke 36:1948–1953

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kang H, Han M, Kwon B et al (2005) Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1921–1928

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taschner CA, Leclerc X, Rachdi H, Barros AM, Pruvo JP (2005) Matrix detachable coils for the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: analysis of early angiographic and clinical outcomes. Stroke 36:2176–2180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Niimi Y, Song J, Madrid M, Berenstein A (2006) Endosaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms using Matrix coils. Early experience and midterm follow-up. Stroke 37:1028–1032

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, McDougall CG (2006) Durability of aneurysm embolization with Matrix detachable coils. Neurosurgery 58:51–59; discussion 51–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sluzewski M, van Rooij W (2005) Questionable interpretation of results of ACTIVE study on Matrix coils by Boston Scientific(letter). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1882–1883

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshino Y, Niimi Y, Song JK, Silane M, Berenstein A (2004) Endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: comparative evaluation in a terminal bifurcation aneurysm model in dogs. J Neurosurg 101:996–1003

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Graves VB, Strother CM, Rappe AH (1993) Treatment of experimental canine carotid aneurysms with platinum coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 14:787–793

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hayakawa M, Murayama Y, Duckwiler GR, Gobin YP, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F (2000) Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system. J Neurosurg 93:561–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tamatani S, Ito Y, Abe H, Koike T, Takeuchi S, Tanaka R (2002) Evaluation of the stability of aneurysms after embolization using detachable coils: correlation between stability of aneurysms and embolized volume of aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 23:762–767

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ding Y, Dai D, Lewis D, Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF (2005) Angiographic and histologic analysis of experimental aneurysms embolized with platinum coils, Matrix, and HydroCoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1757–1763

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Szikora I, Seifert P, Hanzely Z et al (2006) Histopathologic evaluation of aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils or Matrix detachable microcoils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:283–288

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Berenstein has consulting and/or financial interests in Boston Scientific and Microvention companies.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joon K. Song.

Additional information

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, J.K., Niimi, Y., Yoshino, Y. et al. Assessment of Matrix coils in a canine model of a large bifurcation aneurysm. Neuroradiology 49, 231–235 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0177-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-006-0177-x

Keywords

Navigation