Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal MRI in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected neural tube defects (NTDs): impact on diagnosis and management decision

  • Paediatric Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can assess fetuses with sonographically (ultrasonography (US))-suspected neural tube defects (NTD) that might influence their diagnoses and management decision.

Methods

Institutional review board approval and informed consents were obtained to perform MRI for 19 fetuses referred with US-suspected NTD. Prenatal imaging findings were correlated with management decision, postnatal clinical, postnatal imaging, and pathology.

Results

Prenatal MRI correctly ruled out US diagnosis of cephalocele in a fetus. In the other 18 fetuses, MRI detected detailed topography and contents of NTD sacs in five, added central nervous system (CNS) abnormalities that were not apparent on US in three, and confirmed non-CNS findings in three fetuses. MRI changed diagnosis of 3/19 fetuses (15.8%), caused minor change in diagnosis of 5/19 (26.3%), and did not influence US diagnosis of 11/19 fetuses (57.9%). MRI findings changed/modified management decision in 21% of the fetuses.

Conclusion

Fetal MRI is an important adjunct to US in assessing NTD. It can identify topography and contents of sacs, add CNS and non-CNS findings, and influence management decision.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Marco P, Merello E, Mascelli S et al (2006) Current perspectives on the genetic causes of neural tube defects. Neurogenetics 7(4):201–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McGahan JP, Pilu G, Nyberg D (2003) Neural tube defects and the spine. In: Nyberg D, McGahan J, Pretorius D, Pilu G (eds) Diagnostic imaging of fetal anomalies. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 291–334

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birnbacher R, Messerschmidt AM, Pollak AP (2002) Diagnosis and prevention of neural tube defects. Curr Opin Urol 12(6):461–464

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shurtleff DB, Lemire R (1995) Epidemiology, etiologic factors, and prenatal diagnosis of open spinal dysraphism. Neurosurg Clin N Am 6(2):183–193

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Steinbok P, Irvine B, Cochrane DD et al (1992) Long-term outcome and complications of children born with meningomyelocele. Childs Nerv Syst 8(2):92–96

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hubbard AM, Simon EM (2002) Fetal imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 10:389–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simon EM, Goldstein RB, Coakley FV et al (2000) Fast MR imaging of fetal CNS anomalies in utero. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 21:1688–1698

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Turgut F, Turgut M, Onur E et al (2001) In utero MR imaging and management of foetal hydrocephalus and NTDs in the third trimester. J Neurosurg Sci 45(3):189–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Glenn OA, Barkovich AJ (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the fetal brain and spine: an increasingly important tool in prenatal diagnosis, part 2. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1807–1814

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Griffiths PD, Widjaja E, Paley MN et al (2006) Imaging the fetal spine using in utero MR: diagnostic accuracy and impact on management. Pediatr Radiol 36(9):927–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. von Koch CS, Glenn OA, Goldstein RB et al (2005) Fetal magnetic resonance imaging enhances detection of spinal cord anomalies in patients with sonographically detected bony anomalies of the spine. J Ultrasound Med 24:781–789

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi A, Cama A, Piatelli G et al (2004) Spinal dysraphism: MR imaging rationale. J Neuroradiol 31(1):3–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kolble N, Huisman TA, Stallmach T et al (2001) Prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with lumbar myelocystocele. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:536–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Mangels KJ, Tulipan N, Tsao LY et al (2000) Fetal MRI in the evaluation of intrauterine myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 32(3):124–131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haacke EM, Wielopolski PA, Tkach JA et al (1990) Steady-state free precession imaging in the presence of motion: application for improved visualization of the cerebrospinal fluid. Radiology 175(2):545–552

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chung HW, Chen CY, Zimmerman RA, Lee KW, Lee CC, Chin SC (2000) T2-Weighted fast MR imaging with true FISP versus HASTE: comparative efficacy in the evaluation of normal fetal brain maturation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175(5):1375–1380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Guibaud L (2004) Practical approach to prenatal posterior fossa abnormalities using MRI. Pediatr Radiol 34:700–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coniglio SJ, Anderson SM, Ferguson JE (1996) Functional motor outcome in children with myelomeningocele: correlation with anatomic level on prenatal ultrasound. Dev Med Child Neurol 38:675–680

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Aaronson OS, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bruner JP (2003) Myelomeningocele: prenatal evaluation—comparison between transabdominal US and MR imaging. Radiology 227:839–843

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kollias SS, Goldstein RB, Cogen PH, Filly RA (1992) Prenatally detected myelomeningoceles: onographic accuracy in estimation of the spinal level. Radiology 185:109–112

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Korenromp MJ, van Gool JD, Bruinese HW, Kriek R (1986) Early fetal leg movements in myelomeningocele. Lancet 1(8486):917–918

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Correia-Pinto J, Reis J, Hutchins G, Baptista MJ, Estevao-Costa J, Flake AW, Leite-Moreira AF (2002) In utero meconium exposure increases spinal cord necrosis in a rat model of myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Surg 37:488–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sutton LN (2008) Fetal surgery for neural tube defects. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 22(1):175–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rintoul NE, Sutton LN, Hubbard AM, Cohen B, Melchionni J, Pasquariello PS, Adzick NS (2003) A new look at myelomenigoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics 109:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fichter MA, Dornseifer U, Henke J, Schneider KTM, Kovacs L, Biemer E, Bruner J, Adzick NS, Harrison MR, Papadopulos NA (2008) Fetal spina bifida repair—current trends and prospects of intrauterine neurosurgery. Fetal Diagn Ther 23:271–286

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Leung EC, Sgouros S, Williams S, Johnson K (2002) Spinal lipoma misinterpreted as a meningomyelocele on antenatal MRI scan in a baby girl. Childs Nerv Syst 18(6–7):361–363

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Adzick NS, Walsh DS (2003) Myelomeningoclele: prenatal diagnosis, pathophysiology and management. Semin Pediatr Surg 12(3):168–174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Bouchard S, Davey MG, Rintoul NE, Walsh DS, Rorke LB, Adzick NS (2003) Correction of hindbrain herniation and anatomy of the vermis after in utero repair of myelomeningocele in sheep. J Pediatr Surg 38(3):451–458

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. D’Addario V, Pinto V, Di Cagno L et al (2005) The midsagittal view of the fetal brain: a useful landmark in recognizing the cause of fetal cerebral ventriculomegaly. J Perinat Med 33:423–427

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pilu G, Segata M, Ghi T et al (2006) Diagnosis of midline anomalies of the fetal brain with the three-dimensional median view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:522–529

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen CP (2007) Prenatal diagnosis of iniencephaly. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 46(3):199–208

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Pungavkar SA, Sainani N, Karnik AS et al (2007) Antenatal diagnosis of iniencephaly: sonographic and MR correlation: a case report. Korean J Radiol 8(4):351–355

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Simon EM, Pollock AN (2004) Prenatal and postnatal imaging of spinal dysraphism. Semin Roentgenol 39(2):182–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Coakley FV, Hricak H, Filly RA et al (1999) Complex fetal disorders: effect of MR imaging on management-preliminary clinical experience. Radiology 213:691–696

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Miss Amal Mahmoud, the MRI technician.

Conflict of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar N. Saleem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Saleem, S.N., Said, AH., Abdel-Raouf, M. et al. Fetal MRI in the evaluation of fetuses referred for sonographically suspected neural tube defects (NTDs): impact on diagnosis and management decision. Neuroradiology 51, 761–772 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0549-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-009-0549-0

Keywords

Navigation