Skip to main content
Log in

Safety of cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease

  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • Published:
Neuroradiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Contrast-induced nephropathy is a common clinical concern in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures, especially in those with pre-existent kidney disease. We aimed to define the incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy in these high-risk patients in our practice.

Methods

We analyzed data retrospectively from patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures at two academic medical centers over a 4-year period. Contrast-induced nephropathy was determined by an absolute increase in serum creatinine of 0.5 mg/dL or a rise from its baseline value by ≥ 25%, at 48–72 h after exposure to contrast agent after excluding other causes of renal impairment. High-risk patients were identified as those with pre-procedural estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min irrespective of creatinine level, corresponding to stages 3–5 of chronic kidney disease.

Results

One hundred eighty-five high-risk patients undergoing conventional cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular interventions were identified. Only 1 out of 184 (0.54%) high-risk patients developed contrast-induced nephropathy. That one patient had stage 5 chronic kidney disease and multiple other risk factors.

Conclusion

We have observed a very low rate of renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease, traditionally considered high risk for neuroendovascular procedures. Multiple factors may be responsible in the risk reduction of contrast-induced nephropathy in this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

CIN:

Contrast-induced nephropathy

CCA:

Conventional cerebral angiography

DM:

Diabetes mellitus

CKD:

Chronic kidney disease

CHF:

Congestive heart failure

eGFR:

Estimated glomerular filtration rate

NAC:

N acetyl cysteine

References

  1. Mehran R, Nikolsky E (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy: definition, epidemiology, and patients at risk. Kidney Int Suppl 100:S11–S15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. ACR Manual on Contrast Media (2016) American College of Radiology. ACR Committee on Drugs and Contrast Media V 10(2):33–44

    Google Scholar 

  3. Nikolsky E, Aymong ED, Dangas G, Mehran R (2003) Radiocontrast nephropathy: identifying the high-risk patient and the implications of exacerbating renal function. Rev Cardiovasc Med 4(Suppl 1):S7–S14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tepel M, Aspelin P, Lameire N (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy: a clinical and evidence-based approach. Circulation 113(14):1799–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: Evaluation, classification, and stratification (2002). Am J Kidney Dis 39 (2 Suppl 1):S1–266

  6. Coresh J, Astor BC, Greene T, Eknoyan G, Levey AS (2003) Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and decreased kidney function in the adult US population: Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Am J Kidney Dis 41(1):1–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Katzberg RW, Newhouse JH (2010) Intravenous contrast medium-induced nephrotoxicity: is the medical risk really as great as we have come to believe? Radiology 256(1):21–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McDonald JS, McDonald RJ, Comin J, Williamson EE, Katzberg RW, Murad MH, Kallmes DF (2013) Frequency of acute kidney injury following intravenous contrast medium administration: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology 267(1):119–128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tong GE, Kumar S, Chong KC, Shah N, Wong MJ, Zimmet JM, Wang ZJ, Yee J, Fu Y, Yeh BM (2016) Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy for patients receiving intravenous vs. intra-arterial iodixanol administration. Abdom Radiol (NY) 41(1):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Prasad V, Gandhi D, Stokum C, Miller T, Jindal G (2014) Incidence of contrast material-induced nephropathy after neuroendovascular procedures. Radiology 273(3):853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma J, Nanda A, Jung RS, Mehta S, Pooria J, Hsu DP (2013) Risk of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke. J Neurointerv Surg 5(6):543–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lameire N, Adam A, Becker CR, Davidson C, McCullough PA, Stacul F, Tumlin J, Panel CINCW (2006) Baseline renal function screening. Am J Cardiol 98(6A):21K–26K

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Aspelin P, Aubry P, Fransson SG, Strasser R, Willenbrock R, Berg KJ (2003) Nephrotoxic effects in high-risk patients undergoing angiography. N Engl J Med 348(6):491–499

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. McCullough PA, Wolyn R, Rocher LL, Levin RN, O’Neill WW (1997) Acute renal failure after coronary intervention: incidence, risk factors, and relationship to mortality. Am J Med 103(5):368–375

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brinjikji W, Demchuk AM, Murad MH, Rabinstein AA, McDonald RJ, McDonald JS, Kallmes DF (2017) Neurons over nephrons: systematic review and meta-analysis of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 48 (7):1862–1868

  16. Tao Y, Dong W, Li Z, Chen Y, Liang H, Li R, Mo L, Xu L, Liu S, Shi W, Zhang L, Liang X (2017) Proteinuria as an independent risk factor for contrast-induced acute kidney injury and mortality in patients with stroke undergoing cerebral angiography. J Neurointerv Surg 9(5):445–448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fishbane S (2008) N-acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol: CJASN 3(1):281–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jo SH, Youn TJ, Koo BK, Park JS, Kang HJ, Cho YS, Chung WY, Joo GW, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Kim HS (2006) Renal toxicity evaluation and comparison between visipaque (iodixanol) and hexabrix (ioxaglate) in patients with renal insufficiency undergoing coronary angiography: the RECOVER study: a randomized controlled trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 48(5):924–930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Barrett BJ, Katzberg RW, Thomsen HS, Chen N, Sahani D, Soulez G, Heiken JP, Lepanto L, Ni ZH, Ni ZH, Nelson R (2006) Contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing computed tomography: a double-blind comparison of iodixanol and iopamidol. Investig Radiol 41(11):815–821

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Solomon RJ, Natarajan MK, Doucet S, Sharma SK, Staniloae CS, Katholi RE, Gelormini JL, Labinaz M, Moreyra AE, Investigators of the CS (2007) Cardiac Angiography in Renally Impaired atients (CARE) study: a randomized double-blind trial of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Circulation 115(25):3189–3196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Liss P, Persson PB, Hansell P, Lagerqvist B (2006) Renal failure in 57 925 patients undergoing coronary procedures using iso-osmolar or low-osmolar contrast media. Kidney Int 70(10):1811–1817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Heinrich MC, Haberle L, Muller V, Bautz W, Uder M (2009) Nephrotoxicity of iso-osmolar iodixanol compared with nonionic low-osmolar contrast media: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Radiology 250(1):68–86

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pandya B, Chaloub J, Parikh V, Gaddam S, Spagnola J, El-Sayegh S, Bogin M, Kandov R, Lafferty J, Bangalore S (2017) Contrast media use in patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing coronary angiography: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Int J Cardiol 228:137–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rudnick MR, Davidson C, Laskey W, Stafford JL, Sherwin PF, Investigators VT (2008) Nephrotoxicity of iodixanol versus ioversol in patients with chronic kidney disease: the Visipaque Angiography/Interventions with Laboratory Outcomes in Renal Insufficiency (VALOR) Trial. Am Heart J 156(4):776–782

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ramachandra P. Tummala.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in the studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study formal consent is not required.

Informed consent

For this type of retrospective study formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, J., Male, S., Jagadeesan, B.D. et al. Safety of cerebral angiography and neuroendovascular therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease. Neuroradiology 60, 529–533 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1996-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-018-1996-2

Keywords

Navigation