Abstract
We assessed the potential of dual-energy computed tomography (CT) for the differentiation between uric acid (UA)-containing and non-UA-containing urinary stones. Forty urinary stones of 16 different compositions in two sizes (< and ≥ 5 mm) were examined in an ex vivo model. Thirty stones consisted of pure calcium oxalate (whewellite or wheddellite), calcium phosphate (apatite, brushite, or vaterite), ammonium magnesium phosphate (struvite), UA, ammonium acid urate, ammonium phosphate, sodium hydrogen urate, or cystine, and ten stones were of mixed composition (UA-sodium hydrogen urate, whewellite-urate, wheddellite-urate, whewellite-brushite, or whewellite-brushite-struvite). Scans were performed using dual-source CT in a dual-energy mode with the tubes simultaneously operating at 80 and 140 kV. Two readers analysed the data with respect to stone attenuation at each energy level. The stones were classified as UA- or non-UA-containing using manual attenuation measurements and software analysis results. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated using crystallographic stone analysis as the gold standard. Twenty-six out of 40 stones (65%) contained no UA; 14 stones (35%) contained UA. When compared with UA-containing stones, the differences in attenuation values at 80 and 140 kV were significantly (P < 0.001) higher in stones containing no UA. The software automatically mapped 39/40 stones (98%). Only one (2%) 2 mm UA-stone was missed. The software correctly classified all detected stones as UA- or non-UA-containing. The attenuation values of the missed stone were manually plotted into the analysis sheet which allowed for the correct classification of the stone (containing UA). Therefore, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for the detection of UA-containing stones was 100%. Ex vivo experience indicates that differentiation between UA- and non-UA-containing stones can be accurately performed using dual-source dual-energy CT.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coe FL, Evan A, Worcester E (2005) Kidney stone disease. J Clin Invest 115:2598–2608
Deveci S, Coskun M, Tekin MI, Peskircioglu L, Tarhan NC, Ozkardes H (2004) Spiral computed tomography: role in determination of chemical compositions of pure and mixed urinary stones––an in vitro study. Urology 64:237–240
Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159:673–675
Williams JC Jr, Saw KC, Paterson RF, Hatt EK, McAteer JA, Lingeman JE (2003) Variability of renal stone fragility in shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 61:1092–1096 (discussion 1097)
Ngo TC, Assimos DG (2007) Uric Acid nephrolithiasis: recent progress and future directions. Rev Urol 9:17–27
Liebman SE, Taylor JG, Bushinsky DA (2007) Uric acid nephrolithiasis. Curr Rheumatol Rep 9:251–257
Boulay I, Holtz P, Foley WD, White B, Begun FP (1999) Ureteral calculi: diagnostic efficacy of helical CT and implications for treatment of patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 172:1485–1490
Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR, Bove P, Covey AM, Rosenfield AT, Smith RC (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159:735–740
Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G, Ozkaynak C, Karaali K, Kabaalioglu A, Luleci E (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217
Motley G, Dalrymple N, Keesling C, Fischer J, Harmon W (2001) Hounsfield unit density in the determination of urinary stone composition. Urology 58:170–173
Sheir KZ, Mansour O, Madbouly K, Elsobky E, Abdel-Khalek M (2005) Determination of the chemical composition of urinary calculi by noncontrast spiral computerized tomography. Urol Res 33:99–104
Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, Petersilka M, Gruber K, Suss C, Grasruck M, Stierstorfer K, Krauss B, Raupach R et al (2006) First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol 16:256–268
Scheffel H, Alkadhi H, Plass A, Vachenauer R, Desbiolles L, Gaemperli O, Schepis T, Frauenfelder T, Schertler T, Husmann L et al (2006) Accuracy of dual-source CT coronary angiography: first experience in a high pre-test probability population without heart rate control. Eur Radiol 16:2739–2747
Avrin DE, Macovski A, Zatz LE (1978) Clinical application of Compton and photo-electric reconstruction in computed tomography: preliminary results. Invest Radiol 13:217–222
Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, Fink C, Weckbach S, Lenhard M, Schmidt B et al (2007) Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 17:1510–1517
Saw KC, McAteer JA, Monga AG, Chua GT, Lingeman JE, Williams JC Jr (2000) Helical CT of urinary calculi: effect of stone composition, stone size, and scan collimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 175:329–332
Primak AN, Fletcher JG, Vrtiska TJ, Dzyubak OP, Lieske JC, Jackson ME, Williams JC Jr, McCollough CH (2007) Noninvasive differentiation of uric acid versus non-uric acid kidney stones using dual-energy CT. Acad Radiol 14:441–447
Grosjean R, Sauer B, Guerra RM, Daudon M, Blum A, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2008) Characterization of human renal stones with MDCT: advantage of dual energy and limitations due to respiratory motion. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:720–728
Kelcz F, Joseph PM, Hilal SK (1979) Noise considerations in dual energy CT scanning. Med Phys 6:418–425
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the National Center of Competence in Research, Computer Aided and Image Guided Medical Interventions of the Swiss National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stolzmann, P., Scheffel, H., Rentsch, K. et al. Dual-energy computed tomography for the differentiation of uric acid stones: ex vivo performance evaluation. Urol Res 36, 133–138 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-008-0140-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-008-0140-x