Skip to main content
Log in

Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiology procedures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Interventional procedures frequently employ fluoroscopy or digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Few studies have documented radiation doses received by children during these procedures.

Objective

To measure skin entrance dose received during common pediatric interventional procedures.

Materials and methods

MOSFET dosimeters were placed to record skin doses in 143 children undergoing any of five procedures: 30 PICC insertions, 34 CVL/port insertions, 30 G/GJ tube insertions, 25 sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, 24 cerebral angiography procedures. The highest recorded dose (HRD) from the five MOSFET probes was assumed to be the peak skin dose per child. HRD values were averaged for children within each group and correlated with patient weight, fluoroscopy time and number of DSA frames.

Results

Average HRD was 1.8 mGy for PICC insertions, 1.4 mGy for CVL/port insertions, 3.9 mGy for G/GJ tube insertions, 39.1 mGy for sclerotherapy/vascular anomaly procedures, and 149.9 and 101.6 mGy for frontal and lateral portions of cerebral angiography procedures. These entrance doses corresponded to effective dose estimates in the range 0.4–3 mSv. There were only modest correlations between peak skin dose and fluoroscopy time, patient weight and DSA frames (r 2<0.4, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

Pediatric interventional procedures are associated with a wide range of doses; those at the higher end require careful monitoring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Commission on Radiological Protection (2001) Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures, CRP publication 85. Elsevier, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  2. Suleiman O (2004) Radiation doses in pediatric radiology: influence of regulations and standards. Pediatr Radiol 34:242–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. US Food and Drug Administration (1995) Clarification: recording information in the medical patient’s record that identifies the potential for serious X-ray induced skin injuries. Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD

  4. Geise RA, Eubig C, Franz S et al (1998) AAPM report no. 58. Managing the use of fluoroscopy in medical institutions. Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  5. Geise R, O’Dea T (1999) Radiation dose in interventional fluoroscopic procedures. Appl Radiat Isot 50:173–184

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vano E, Gonzalez L, Ten J et al (2001) Skin dose and dose-area product values for interventional cardiology procedures. Br J Radiol 74:48–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Gkanatsios N, Huda W, Peters K (2001) Adult patient doses in interventional neuroradiology. Med Phys 29:717–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kemerink G, Frantzen M, Oei K et al (2002) Patient and occupational dose in neurointerventional procedures. Neuroradiology 44:522–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Miller D, Balter S, Cole P et al (2003) Radiation doses in interventional radiology procedures: the RAD-IR study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 14:711–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W (2001) Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR 176:289–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Frush D, Donnelly L, Rosen N (2003) Computed tomography and radiation risks: what pediatric health care providers should know. Pediatrics 112:951–957

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Balter S, Fletcher D, Kuan H et al (2002) Techniques to estimate radiation dose to skin during fluoroscopically guided procedures. AAPM, Medical Physics Publishing, Madison, WI

    Google Scholar 

  13. Swoboda N, Armstrong D, Charkot E et al (2005) Pediatric patient surface doses in neuroangiography. Pediatr Radiol 35:859–866

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Best Medical Canada (2008) Thomson Nielsen mobile MOSFET operator’s manual. Best Medical Canada, Ottawa, Canada

  15. Yoshizumi TT, Goodman PC, Frush DP et al (2007) Validation of metal oxide semiconductor field effect transistor technology for organ dose assessment during CT: comparison with thermoluminescent dosimetry. AJR 188:1332–1336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoshizumi T, Sarder M, Goodman P et al (2003) Application of MOSFET technology in CT organ assessment (abstract). Proceedings AAPM Annual Meeting. Med Physics 30:1422

    Google Scholar 

  17. McClave J, Dietrich F (1988) Statistics, 4th edn. Dellen, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hart D, Jones DG, Wall BF (1996) Estimation of effective doses for pediatric X-ray examinations. NRPB-R279. National Radiation Protection Board, Chilton

    Google Scholar 

  19. National Research Council (1990) Health effects of exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation. BEIR V. National Academy Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hall EJ (2002) Lessons we have learned from our children: cancer risks from diagnostic radiology. Pediatr Radiol 32:700–706

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. van de Putte S, Verhaegen F, Taeymans Y et al (2000) Correlation of patient skin doses in cardiac interventional radiology with dose-area product. Br J Radiol 73:504–513

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chu RY, Thomas G, Maqbool F (2006) Skin entrance radiation dose in an interventional radiology procedure. Health Phys 91:41–46

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Roshau J, Hintenlang D (2003) Characterization of the angular response of an isotropic MOSFET dosimeter. Health Phys 84:376–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bairbre L. Connolly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Glennie, D., Connolly, B.L. & Gordon, C. Entrance skin dose measured with MOSFETs in children undergoing interventional radiology procedures. Pediatr Radiol 38, 1180–1187 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0966-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0966-y

Keywords

Navigation