Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gd-DOTA administration at MRI in children younger than 18 months of age: immediate adverse reactions

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

There is a paucity of evidence with regard to the safety of contrast medium administration at MRI in neonates and infants.

Purpose

To assess immediate adverse reactions in children younger than 18 months of age during routine clinical utilization of gadoteric acid (Gd-DOTA) in a cohort of patients with nonselected indications.

Materials and methods

One hundred and four neonates and infants were enrolled in a postmarketing survey with Gd-DOTA (Dotarem, Guerbet, Roissy, France) from a single pediatric hospital. A standardized questionnaire was used to collect the patient information.

Results

All included children, ages 3 days to 18 months, received one injection of Gd-DOTA (volume 0.6–4 ml). No immediate adverse event was reported.

Conclusion

This postmarketing study involving neonates and infants suggests a favorable safety profile of Gd-DOTA in routine practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burtea C, Laurent S, Vander Elst L et al (2008) Contrast agents: magnetic resonance. Handb Exp Pharmacol 185:135–165

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hanquinet S, Christophe C, Greef DD et al (1996) Clinical evaluation of gadodiamide injection in paediatric MR imaging. Pediatr Radiol 26:806–810

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadowski EA, Bennett LK, Chan MR et al (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: risk factors and incidence estimation. Radiology 243:148–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grobner T (2006) Gadolinium—a specific trigger for the development of nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis? Nephrol Dial Transplant 21:1104–1108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Altun E, Semelka RC, Cakit C (2009) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis and management of high-risk patients. Acad Radiol 16:897–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Janus N, Launay-Vacher V, Karie S et al (2010) Prevalence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in renal insufficiency patients: results of the finest study. Eur J Radiol 73:357–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mendichovszky IA, Marks SD, Simcock CM et al (2008) Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: time to tighten practice. Pediatr Radiol 38:489–496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morcos SK (2008) Extracellular gadolinium contrast agents: differences in stability. Eur J Radiol 66:175–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Herve-Somma CM, Sebag GH, Prieur AM et al (1992) Juvenile rheumatoid arthritis of the knee: MR evaluation with Gd-DOTA. Radiology 182:93–98

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Bonnerot V, Sebag G, de Montalembert M et al (1994) Gadolinium-DOTA enhanced MRI of painful osseous crises in children with sickle cell anemia. Pediatr Radiol 24:92–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ducou le Pointe H, Haddad S, Silberman B et al (1994) Legg-Perthes-Calve disease: staging by MRI using gadolinium. Pediatr Radiol 24:88–91

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hermans R (2006) Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome. Cancer Imaging 6:S145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hsu WC, Loevner LA, Karpati R et al (2005) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting absence of fixation of head and neck cancer to the prevertebral space. Head Neck 27:95–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bartels U, Shroff M, Sung L et al (2006) Role of spinal MRI in the follow-up of children treated for medulloblastoma. Cancer 107:1340–1347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi S, Hayakawa K, Nakane T et al (2009) Visualization of intraneural edema using gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sci 14:24–34

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Drape JL, Thelen P, Gay-Depassier P et al (1993) Intraarticular diffusion of Gd-DOTA after intravenous injection in the knee: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 188:227–234

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Willinek WA, Schild HH (2008) Clinical advantages of 3.0 T MRI over 1.5 T. Eur J Radiol 65:2–14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Riccabona M, Simbrunner J, Ring E et al (2002) Feasibility of MR urography in neonates and infants with anomalies of the upper urinary tract. Eur Radiol 12:1442–1450

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Herborn CU, Honold E, Wolf M et al (2007) Clinical safety and diagnostic value of the gadolinium chelate gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA). Invest Radiol 42:58–62

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Briand Y, Neiss AC, Vitry A (1992) Efficacy and safety of the macrocyclic complex Gd-DOTA in children: results of a multi-centre study. In: 29th congress of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, Budapest: R12.

  21. Shellock FG, Parker JR, Pirovano G et al (2006) Safety characteristics of gadobenate dimeglumine: clinical experience from intra- and interindividual comparison studies with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1378–1385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuo PH, Kanal E, Abu-Alfa AK et al (2007) Gadolinium-based MR contrast agents and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. Radiology 242:647–649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Grobner T (2008) Prischl FC (2008) Patient characteristics and risk factors for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis for gadolinium exposure. Semin Dial 21:135–139

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Idee JM, Port M, Dencausse A et al (2009) Involvement of gadolinium chelates in the mechanism of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: an update. Radiol Clin N Am 47:855–869

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was partially supported by, and data analysis was performed by, the Guerbet group, Roissy, France. The authors have no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the contents of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sophie Emond.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Emond, S., Brunelle, F. Gd-DOTA administration at MRI in children younger than 18 months of age: immediate adverse reactions. Pediatr Radiol 41, 1401–1406 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2167-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2167-3

Keywords

Navigation