Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging abusive head trauma: why use both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging?

  • Special Issue: Abusive Head Trauma
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Abusive head trauma is the leading cause of death in child abuse cases. The majority of victims are infants younger than 1 year old, with the average age between 3 and 8 months, although these injuries can be seen in children up to 5 years old. Many victims have a history of previous abuse and the diagnosis is frequently delayed. Neuroimaging is often crucial for establishing the diagnosis of abusive head trauma as it detects occult injury in 37% of cases. Several imaging patterns are considered to be particularly associated with abusive head trauma. The presence of subdural hematoma, especially in multiple locations, such as the interhemispheric region, over the convexity and in the posterior fossa, is significantly associated with abusive head trauma. Although CT is the recommended first-line imaging modality for suspected abusive head trauma, early MRI is increasingly used alongside CT because it provides a better estimation of shear injuries, hypoxic-ischemic insult and the timing of lesions. This article presents a review of the use and clinical indications of the most pertinent neuroimaging modalities for the diagnosis of abusive head trauma, emphasizing the newer and more sensitive techniques that may be useful to better characterize the nature and evolution of the injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization (1999) Report of the consultation on child abuse prevention. World Health Organization, Social Change and Mental Health, Violence and Injury Prevention, Geneva, pp 13–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kleinman PK (1998) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse, 2nd edn. Mosby Inc., St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adamsbaum C, Grabar S, Mejean N et al (2010) Abusive head trauma: judicial admissions highlight violent and repetitive shaking. Pediatrics 126:546–555

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayawant S, Rawlinson A, Gibbon F et al (1998) Subdural haemorrhages in infants: population based study. BMJ 317:1558–1561

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caffey J (1946) Multiple fractures in the long bones of infants suffering from chronic subdural hematoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol 56:163–173

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Caffey J (1974) The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics 54:396–403

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rubin DM, Christian CW, Bilaniuk LT et al (2003) Occult head injury in high-risk abused children. Pediatrics 111:1382–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barlow KM, Minns RA (2000) Annual incidence of shaken impact syndrome in young children. Lancet 356:1571–1572

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Talvik I, Metsvaht T, Leito K et al (2006) Inflicted traumatic brain injury (ITBI) or shaken baby syndrome (SBS) in Estonia. Acta Paediatr 95:799–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. King WJ, MacKay M, Sirnick A et al (2003) Shaken baby syndrome in Canada: clinical characteristics and outcomes of hospital cases. CMAJ 168:155–159

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A et al (1999) Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA 281:621–626

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Case ME, Graham MA, Handy TC et al (2001) Position paper on fatal abusive head injuries in infants and young children. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 22:112–122

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Finnie JW, Blumbergs PC, Manavis J et al (2012) Neuropathological changes in a lamb model of non-accidental head injury (the shaken baby syndrome). J Clin Neurosci 19:1159–1164

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ichord RN, Naim M, Pollock AN et al (2007) Hypoxic-ischemic injury complicates inflicted and accidental traumatic brain injury in young children: the role of diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurotrauma 24:106–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ewing-Cobbs L, Kramer L, Prasad M et al (1998) Neuroimaging, physical, and developmental findings after inflicted and noninflicted traumatic brain injury in young children. Pediatrics 102:300–307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Vinchon M, Noulé N, Tchofo PJ et al (2004) Imaging of head injuries in infants: temporal correlates and forensic implications for the diagnosis of child abuse. J Neurosurg 101:44–52

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kemp AM, Jaspan T, Griffiths J et al (2011) Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child 96:1103–1112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vezina G (2009) Assessment of the nature and age of subdural collections in nonaccidental head injury with CT and MRI. Pediatr Radiol 39:586–590

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hedlund GL (2012) Subdural hemorrhage in abusive head trauma: imaging challenges and controversies. J Am Osteopath Coll Radiol 1:23–30

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shugerman RP, Paez A, Grossman DC et al (1996) Epidural hemorrhage: is it abuse? Pediatrics 97:664–668

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Geddes JF, Hackshaw AK, Vowles GH et al (2001) Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. I. Patterns of brain damage. Brain 124:1290–1298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Geddes JF, Vowles GH, Hackshaw AK et al (2001) Neuropathology of inflicted head injury in children. II. Microscopic brain injury in infants. Brain 124:1299–1306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levine LM (2003) Pediatric ocular trauma and shaken infant syndrome. Pediatr Clin North Am 50:137–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Piteau SJ, Ward MG, Barrowman NJ et al (2012) Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics 130:315–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maguire SA, Watts PO, Shaw AD et al (2013) Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review. Eye (Lond) 27:28–36

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gilles EE, Nelson MD Jr (1998) Cerebral complications of nonaccidental head injury in childhood. Pediatr Neurol 19:119–128

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rao P, Carty H, Pierce A (1999) The acute reversal sign: comparison of medical and non-accidental injury patients. Clin Radiol 54:495–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T, Boos S, Spivack B et al (2012) Abusive head trauma Part II: radiological aspects. Eur J Pediatr 171:617–623

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmerman RA, Bilaniuk LT, Farina L (2007) Non-accidental brain trauma in infants: diffusion imaging, contributions to understanding the injury process. J Neuroradiol 34:109–114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA et al (2004) Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann Neurol 56:36–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Jaspan T, Griffiths PD, McConachie NS et al (2003) Neuroimaging for non-accidental head injury in childhood: a proposed protocol. Clin Radiol 58:44–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Rajaram S, Batty R, Rittey CD et al (2011) Neuroimaging in non-accidental head injury in children: an important element of assessment. Postgrad Med J 87:355–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kemp AM, Dunstan F, Harrison S et al (2008) Patterns of skeletal fractures in child abuse: systematic review. BMJ 337:a1518

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Leventhal JM, Thomas SA, Rosenfield NS et al (1993) Fractures in young children. Distinguishing child abuse from unintentional injuries. Am J Dis Child 147:87–92

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choudhary AK, Bradford RK, Dias MS et al (2012) Spinal subdural hemorrhage in abusive head trauma: a retrospective study. Radiology 262:216–223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Kemp AM, Joshi AH, Mann M et al (2010) What are the clinical and radiological characteristics of spinal injuries from physical abuse: a systematic review. Arch Dis Child 95:355–360

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. DiPietro MA, Brody AS, Cassady CI et al (2009) Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Section on Radiology; American Academy of Pediatrics. Pediatrics 123:1430–1435

  38. Meyer JS, Coley BD, Karmazyn B et al (2012) Expert panel on pediatric imaging. ACR appropriateness criteria® suspected physical abuse -- child. American College of Radiology (ACR). http://www.guideline.gov/content.aspx?id=37948

  39. Royal College of Radiologists, Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (2008) Standards for radiological investigations of suspected nonaccidentalinjury. http://www.rcr.ac.uk/docs/radiology/pdf/rcpch_rcr_final.pdf

  40. Nimkin K, Kleinman PK (2001) Imaging of child abuse. Radiol Clin North Am 39:843–864

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Tung GA, Kumar M, Richardson RC et al (2006) Comparison of accidental and nonaccidental traumatic head injury in children on noncontrast computed tomography. Pediatrics 118:626–633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kemp AM, Rajaram S, Mann M et al (2009) What neuroimaging should be performed in children in whom inflicted brain injury (iBI) is suspected? A systematic review. Clin Radiol 64:473–483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Chen CY, Chou TY, Zimmerman RA et al (1996) Pericerebral fluid collection: differentiation of enlarged subarachnoid spaces from subdural collections with color Doppler US. Radiology 201:389–392

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Amodio J, Spektor V, Pramanik B et al (2005) Spontaneous development of bilateral subdural hematomas in an infant with benign infantile hydrocephalus: color Doppler assessment of vessels traversing extra-axial spaces. Pediatr Radiol 35:1113–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Hedlund GL, Frasier LD (2009) Neuroimaging of abusive head trauma. Forensic Sci Med Pathol 5:280–290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Adamsbaum C, Méjean N, Merzoug V et al (2010) How to explore and report children with suspected non-accidental trauma. Pediatr Radiol 40:932–938

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Fujiwara T, Okuyama M, Miyasaka M (2008) Characteristics that distinguish abusive from nonabusive head trauma among young children who underwent head computed tomography in Japan. Pediatrics 122:e841–e847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Adamsbaum C, Rambaud C (2012) Abusive head trauma: don’t overlook bridging vein thrombosis. Pediatr Radiol 42:1298–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Bradford R, Choudhary AK, Dias MS (2013) Serial neuroimaging in infants with abusive head trauma: timing abusive injuries. J Neurosurg Pediatr 12:110–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Colbert CA, Holshouser BA, Aaen GS et al (2010) Value of cerebral microhemorrhages detected with susceptibility-weighted MR imaging for prediction of long-term outcome in children with nonaccidental trauma. Radiology 256:898–905

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Tanoue K, Aida N, Matsui K (2013) Apparent diffusion coefficient values predict outcomes of abusive head trauma. Acta Paediatr 102:805–808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Ashwal S, Wycliffe ND, Holshouser BA (2010) Advanced neuroimaging in children with nonaccidental trauma. Dev Neurosci 32:343–360

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Koumellis P, McConachie NS, Jaspan T (2009) Spinal subdural haematomas in children with non-accidental head injury. Arch Dis Child 94:216–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Foerster BR, Petrou M, Lin D et al (2009) Neuroimaging evaluation of non-accidental head trauma with correlation to clinical outcomes: a review of 57 cases. J Pediatr 154:573–577

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Barnes PD (2011) Imaging of nonaccidental injury and the mimics: issues and controversies in the era of evidence-based medicine. Radiol Clin North Am 49:205–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Twomey EL, Naughten ER, Donoghue VB et al (2003) Neuroimaging findings in glutaric aciduria type 1. Pediatr Radiol 33:823–830

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Celine Cavallo for English language support

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elida Vázquez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vázquez, E., Delgado, I., Sánchez-Montañez, A. et al. Imaging abusive head trauma: why use both computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging?. Pediatr Radiol 44 (Suppl 4), 589–603 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3216-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3216-5

Keywords

Navigation