Skip to main content
Log in

Animated educational video to prepare children for MRI without sedation: evaluation of the appeal and value

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

MRI scans can be distressing for children and often require sedation. Educating children about what to expect reduces anxiety and increases likelihood of successful non-sedated MRI scans. Multimedia tools are a popular means of education. Animated video could provide a free, accessible method of preparing children for MRI scans.

Objective

To evaluate a new animation video for preparing children for MRI, specifically for decreasing in-scanner motion and examination failure.

Materials and methods

We recruited 24 healthy children ages 5–11 years. Participants underwent pre- and post-viewing questionnaires and structured interviews. We then compared median Likert scale score changes between pre- and post-animation questions and analyzed the interview framework. Participants were filmed viewing the animation to calculate time spent looking at the screen to assess how well the video retained children’s attention.

Results

There were significant improvements in median scores regarding what to expect, checking for metal and keeping still. There were no significant changes in other knowledge-based topics. There were significant improvements in median scores for anxiety-based topics. On average, children watched the screen for 98.9% of the 174-s animation.

Conclusion

The animation improved knowledge, reduced anxiety, retained attention and was enjoyed by participants. It can be accessed freely via the Internet to help prepare children ages 5–11 for having an MRI scan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marshall S, Smith M, Weinberger E (1995) Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr 34:59–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chou I, Tench C, Gowland P et al (2014) Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3T MRI and experienced adults’ perspective on children's tolerability of 7T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. BMJ Open 4:e006094

  3. Serafini G, Zadra N (2008) Anaesthesia for MRI in the paediatric patient. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 21:499–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Walker L, Claar R, Barnard J (2002) Children's knowledge, anticipatory anxiety, procedural distress, and recall of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 34:68–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Li H, Lopez V, Lee T (2007) Effects of preoperative therapeutic play on outcomes of school-age children undergoing day surgery. Res Nurs Health 30:320–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Carter A, Greer M, Gray S et al (2010) Mock MRI: reducing the need for anaesthesia in children. Pediatr Radiol 40:1368–1374

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hallowell L, Stewart S, de Amorim e Silva C et al (2008) Reviewing the process of preparing children for MRI. Pediatr Radiol 38:271–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. (2014) One of a kind — a children's guide to radiography. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pBjobqdtrc. Accessed 1st August 2016.

  9. Guo P, Kim J, Rubin R (2014) How video production affects student engagement: an empirical study of MOOC videos. Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning @ scale conference. ACM, New York, pp 41–50

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Van Laerhoven H, Van der Zaag-Loonen H, Derkx B (2004) A comparison of Likert scale and visual analogue scales as response options in children's questionnaires. Acta Paediatr 93:830–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garland R (1991) The midpoint on a rating scale: is it desirable? Mark Bull 2:66–70

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R (eds) Analyzing qualitative data. Sage Publications, London, pp 173–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Stevenson C, Alberto R, van den Boom A et al (2014) Visual relations children find easy and difficult to process in figural analogies. Front Psychol 5:827

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Greenberg LM, Waldman ID (1993) Developmental normative data on the test of variables of attention (T.O.V.A.). J Child Psychol Psychiatry 34(6):1019–30

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the children who took part in this study, their parents and other caregivers, and the staff of Fairway Primary School and the Long Eaton Sports Acrobatics Club.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert A. Dineen.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 2

Questionnaire (PDF 73 kb)

Supplementary material 3

Interview template (PDF 43 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Szeszak, S., Man, R., Love, A. et al. Animated educational video to prepare children for MRI without sedation: evaluation of the appeal and value. Pediatr Radiol 46, 1744–1750 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3661-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-016-3661-4

Keywords

Navigation