Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

3 Tesla MR neurography—technique, interpretation, and pitfalls

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MRI has been used for almost two decades for the evaluation of peripheral nerve disorders. This article highlights the relative advantages and disadvantages of 3T MR neurography in the evaluation of peripheral neuropathies. The authors also describe the high-resolution MR neurography technique on 3T MRI, along with the approach to its interpretation that has evolved at one institution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bendszus M, Koltzenburg M, Wessig C, Solymosi L. Sequential MR imaging of denervated muscle: experimental study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;23(8):1427–31.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang KJ, Kamel IR, Macura KJ, Bluemke DA. 3.0-T MR imaging of the abdomen: comparison with 1.5 T. Radiographics. 2008;28(7):1983–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chappell KE, Robson MD, Stonebridge-Foster A, Glover A, Allsop JM, Williams AD, et al. Magic angle effects in MR neurography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(3):431–40.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chhabra A, Subhawong TK, William EH, Wang KC, Hashemi S, Thawait SK, Carrino JA. High resolution MR neurography evaluation prior to repeat tarsal tunnel surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;197. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5763.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chhabra A, Williams EH, Subhawong TK, Hashemi S, Soldatos T, Wang KC, et al. MR neurography findings of soleal sling entrapment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196(3):W290–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chhabra A, Williams EH, Wang KC, Dellon AL, Carrino JA. MR neurography of neuromas related to nerve injury and entrapment with surgical correlation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010;31(8):1363–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Choi JY, Kim MJ, Chung YE, Kim JY, Jones AC, De Becker J, et al. Abdominal applications of 3.0-T MR imaging: comparative review versus a 1.5-T system. Radiographics. 2008;28(4):e30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dellon AL. Management of peripheral nerve problems in the upper and lower extremity using quantitative sensory testing. Hand Clin. 1999;15(4):697–715.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Filler A. Magnetic resonance neurography and diffusion tensor imaging: origins, history, and clinical impact of the first 50,000 cases with an assessment of efficacy and utility in a prospective 5000-patient study group. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(4 Suppl):A29–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Filler AG, Kliot M, Howe FA, Hayes CE, Saunders DE, Goodkin R, et al. Application of magnetic resonance neurography in the evaluation of patients with peripheral nerve pathology. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(2):299–309.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hof JJ, Kliot M, Slimp J, Haynor DR. What's new in MRI of peripheral nerve entrapment? Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2008;19(4):583–95. vi.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Iba K, Wada T, Tamakawa M, Aoki M, Yamashita T. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of the ulnar nerve in cubital tunnel syndrome. Hand Surg. 2010;15(1):11–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, Wilkins DE, Williams FH. Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM Quality Assurance Committee. Muscle Nerve. 1993;16:1392–414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jambawalikar S, Baum J, Button T, Li H, Geronimo V, Gould ES. Diffusion tensor imaging of peripheral nerves. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;39(11):1073–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koltzenburg M, Bendszus M. Imaging of peripheral nerve lesions. Curr Opin Neurol. 2004;17(5):621–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kuntz CT, Blake L, Britz G, Filler A, Hayes CE, Goodkin R, et al. Magnetic resonance neurography of peripheral nerve lesions in the lower extremity. Neurosurgery. 1996;39(4):750–6. discussion 756–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuwabara S, Nakajima M, Matsuda S, Hattori T. Magnetic resonance imaging at the demyelinative foci in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy. Neurology. 1997;48(4):874–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lehmann HC, Zhang J, Mori S, Sheikh KA. Diffusion tensor imaging to assess axonal regeneration in peripheral nerves. Exp Neurol. 2010;223(1):238–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Moore KR, Tsuruda JS, Dailey AT. The value of MR neurography for evaluating extraspinal neuropathic leg pain: a pictorial essay. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(4):786–94.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Mukherjee P, Chung SW, Berman JI, Hess CP, Henry RG. Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: technical considerations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29(5):843–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Naganawa S, Ishihara S, Satake H, Kawai H, Sone M, Nakashima T. Simultaneous three-dimensional visualization of the intra-parotid facial nerve and parotid duct using a three-dimensional reversed FISP sequence with diffusion weighting. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2010;9(3):153–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nanko S, Oshima H, Watanabe T, Sasaki S, Hara M, Shibamoto Y. Usefulness of the application of the BLADE technique to reduce motion artifacts on navigation-triggered prospective acquisition correction (PACE) T2-weighted MRI (T2WI) of the liver. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(2):321–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peer S, Bodner G, Meirer R, Willeit J, Piza-Katzer H. Examination of postoperative peripheral nerve lesions with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;177(2):415–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Petchprapa CN, Rosenberg ZS, Sconfienza LM, Cavalcanti CF, Vieira RL, Zember JS. MR imaging of entrapment neuropathies of the lower extremity. Part 1. The pelvis and hip. Radiographics. 2010;30(4):983–1000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Stuart RM, Koh ES, Breidahl WH. Sonography of peripheral nerve pathology. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(1):123–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tagliafico A, Succio G, Emanuele Neumaier C, Serafini G, Ghidara M, Calabrese M, Martinoli C. MR imaging of the brachial plexus: comparison between 1.5-T and 3-T MR imaging: preliminary experience. Skeletal Radiol. 2010;40(6):717–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Tagliafico A, Succio G, Neumaier CE, Baio G, Serafini G, Ghidara M, Calabrese M, Martinoli C. Brachial plexus assessment with three-dimensional isotropic resolution fast spin echo MRI: comparison with conventional MRI at 3.0 T. Br J Radiol. 2011 Feb 22. [Epub ahead of print].

  28. Thawait SK, Chaudhry V, Thawait GK, Wang KC, Belzberg A, Carrino JA, et al. High-resolution MR neurography of diffuse peripheral nerve lesions. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2257.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Toros T, Karabay N, Ozaksar K, Sugun TS, Kayalar M, Bal E. Evaluation of peripheral nerves of the upper limb with ultrasonography: a comparison of ultrasonographic examination and the intra-operative findings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91(6):762–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Viallon M, Vargas MI, Jlassi H, Lovblad KO, Delavelle J. High-resolution and functional magnetic resonance imaging of the brachial plexus using an isotropic 3D T2 STIR (short term inversion recovery) SPACE sequence and diffusion tensor imaging. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:1018–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Yamabe E, Nakamura T, Oshio K, Kikuchi Y, Ikegami H, Toyama Y. Peripheral nerve injury: diagnosis with MR imaging of denervated skeletal muscle–experimental study in rats. Radiology. 2008;247(2):409–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosures

Dr. Chhabra has research grants from GE-AUR (GERRAF), Siemens Medical Solutions, and Integra Life Sciences. Dr. Chhabra also serves as a research consultant with Siemens CAD group

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins Hospital, 601 North Caroline Street, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA

    Avneesh Chhabra, Pearlene P. Lee, Cary Bizzell & Theodoros Soldatos

Authors
  1. Avneesh Chhabra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Pearlene P. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cary Bizzell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Theodoros Soldatos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Avneesh Chhabra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chhabra, A., Lee, P.P., Bizzell, C. et al. 3 Tesla MR neurography—technique, interpretation, and pitfalls. Skeletal Radiol 40, 1249–1260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1183-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-011-1183-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation