Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Percutaneous vertebroplasty to treat painful myelomatous vertebral deposits—long-term efficacy outcomes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Developed for benign conditions including osteoporotic fractures and haemangiomas, vertebroplasty has since been employed in neoplastic lesions, including myeloma. Advances in myeloma treatments, yielding improved survival times, have led to an increasing need for effective therapies that improve quality of life. The first randomised trials of vertebroplasty to treat painful osteoporotic crush fractures have cast doubt of its benefit over a placebo procedure, with a proposed rationale that fracture healing over time may account for the non-superiority of the results. However, these findings cannot be extrapolated to myeloma where the pathology is one of progressive bony destruction coupled with failure of new bone formation. In this paper, we present the outcome data for myeloma patients treated at our tertiary referral centre over a 5-year period, focusing on both subjective and objective measures of efficacy and safety. Records were reviewed to extract pain score, function and analgesia pre/post-procedure. Where possible, patients were then contacted directly and asked to assess their benefit by grading change in pain score, analgesia use and mobility. Performance status was assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group scale. Of the 26 patients treated for painful thoraco-lumbar lesions, 77% reported improved pain score (P < 0.003). Analgesia reduction, better mobility and improved performance status were also seen. Our data support the consideration of vertebroplasty as a first-line treatment for painful myelomatous vertebral disease. Prospective randomised studies are now required to further define its role.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lecouvet FE, Vande Berg BC, Maldague BE, Michaux L, Laterre E, Michaux JL, Ferrant A, Malghem J (1997) Vertebral compression fractures in multiple myeloma. Part I. Distribution and appearance at MR imaging. Radiology 204:195–199

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nicola N, Lins E (1987) Vertebral haemangioma: retrograde embolization–stabilization with methyl methacrylate. Surg Neurol 27:481–486

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deramond H, Saliou G, Aveillan M, Lehmann P, Vallée JN (2006) Respective contributions of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty to the management of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Joint Bone Spine 73(6):610–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee B, Franklin I, Lewis JS, Coombes RC, Leonard R, Gishen P, Stebbing J (2009) The efficacy of percutaneous vertebroplasty for vertebral metastases associated with solid malignancies. Eur J Cancer 45(9):1597–1602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tran Thang N, Abdo G, Martin J-B, Seium-Neberay Y, Yilmaz H, Verbist M-C, Rufenacht D, Sappino A-P, Dietrich P-Y (2008) Percutaneous cementoplasty in multiple myeloma: a valuable adjunct for pain control and ambulation maintenance. Support Care Cancer 16:891–896

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Oken MM, Creech RH, Tormey DC et al (1982) Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol 5(6):649–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ramos L, Las Heras JA, Sanchez S, Gonzalez-Porras JR, Gonzalez R, Mateos MV, San Miguel JF (2006) Medium-term results of percuteneous vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 77:7–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cotton A, Dewatre F, Cortet B, Assaker R, Leblond D, Desquesnoy B, Chastanet P, Clarisse J (1996) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteolytic metastases and myeloma: effects of the percentage of lesion filling and the leakage of methylmethacrylate at clinical follow-up. Radiology 200:525–530

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bartolozzi B, Nozzoli C, Pandolfo C, Antonioli E, Guizzardi G, Morichi R, Bosi A (2006) Percuteneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty in patients with multiple myeloma. Eur J Haematol 76:180–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Buchbinder R, Osborne RH, Ebeling PR, Wark JD, Mitchell P, Wriedt C, Graves S, Staples MP, Murphy B (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):557–568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kallmes D, Comstock BA, Heagerty PJ, Turner JA, Wilson DJ, Diamond TH, Edwards R, Gray LA, Stout L, Owen S, Hollingworth W, Ghdoke B, Annesley-Williams DJ, Ralston SH, Jarvik JG (2009) A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures. N Engl J Med 361(6):569–579

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tian E, Zhan F, Walker R et al (2003) The role of the Wnt/b-catenin signaling antagonist DKK1 in the development of osteolytic lesions in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 349:2483–2494

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Roodman GD (2004) Mechanisms of bone metastasis. N Engl J Med 350:1655–1664

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Movrin I, Vengust R, Komadina (2010) Adjacent vertebral fractures after percutaneous vertebral augmentation of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: a comparison of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg (in press)

  15. Kose KC, Cebesoy O, Akan B, Altinel L, Dincer D, Yazar T (2006) Functional results of vertebral augmentation techniques in pathological vertebral fractures of myelomatous patients. J Natl Med Assoc 98(10):1654–1658

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Weill A, Chiras J, Simon JM, Rose M, Sola-Martinez T, Enkaoua E (1996) Spinal metastases: indications for and results of percutaneous injection of acrylic surgical cement. Radiology 199:241–247

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakrabarti I, Burton AW, Rao G, Feiz-Erfan I, Hlatky R, Rhines LD, Mendel E (2006) Percutaneous vertebroplasty of a myelomatous compression fracture in the presence of previous posterior instrumentation: report of two cases. J Neurosurg Spine 5:168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Oakland RJ, Furtado NR, Timothy J, Hall RM (2008) The biomechanics of vertebroplasty in multiple myeloma and metastatic bladder cancer: a preliminary cadaveric investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 9:439–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. San Milan RD, Burkhardt K, Jean B, Muster M, Martin JB, Bouvier J, Fasel JH, Rufenacht DA, Kurt AM (1999) Pathology findings with acrylic implants. Bone 25:85S–90S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kuo PH, Cheng DW (2005) Artifactual spinal metastases imaged by PET/CT: a case report. J Nucl Med Technol 33:230–231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Fossaceca R, Di Terlizzi M, Stecco A, Canalis L, Travaglini F, Ambrosini R, Carriero A (2007) MRI post-vertebroplasty. Radiol Med 112:185–194

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodriguez-Catarino M, Blimark C, Willen J, Mellqvist U, Rodjer S (2007) Percutaneous vertebroplasty at C2: case report of a patient with multiple myeloma and a literature review. Eur Spine J 16(Suppl 3):S242–S249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou B, Wu C, Li M, Gu Y, Cheng Y (2009) Percutaneous osteoplasty for painful sterna lesion from multiple myeloma. Skeletal Radiol 38:281–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mont’Alverne F, Vallee J, Guillevin R, Cormier E, Jean B, Rose M, Caldas JG, Chiras J (2009) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for multiple myeloma of the cervical spine. Neuroradiology 51:237–242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. Belinda Lee for her advice on patient evaluation and questionnaire and Dr. Richard Szydlo for his help with P value derivation. We would also like to thank Dr. John Garland who read and commented on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paula Garland.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garland, P., Gishen, P. & Rahemtulla, A. Percutaneous vertebroplasty to treat painful myelomatous vertebral deposits—long-term efficacy outcomes. Ann Hematol 90, 95–100 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-1021-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-010-1021-2

Keywords

Navigation