Skip to main content
Log in

Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience

  • Neuro
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

The application of image registration and subtraction to detect change in multiple sclerosis (MS) disease burden on serial MR scans benefits from the use of isotropic voxels. An optimised 3D fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequence with 1.2- and 1.8-mm cubic voxels was compared with a 2D T2 SE sequence using standard 3-mm slices. Three-dimensional fast FLAIR and T2 SE series were obtained in 20 MS patients and 15 controls. Whole brain acquisition times for the 1.2- and 1.8-mm FLAIR were 21 and 10.5 min, respectively, for the interleaved T2 SE 16 min. Brain lesions were marked in consensus by two radiologists and the CNR was calculated in ten lesions. The mean number of lesions detected with the 1.2-mm FLAIR sequence was 115±76, compared with 85±59 for the T2 SE series (p<0.001). The 1.8-mm FLAIR detected only 73±46 lesions. The CNR of the 1.2-mm FLAIR was significantly better than the T2 SE (p<0.01), but not as good as the 1.8-mm FLAIR. In conclusion, isotropic 3D fast FLAIR using 1.2-mm cubic voxels is superior to the 2D T2 SE in the detection of brain lesions in MS patients. The isotropic 1.8-mm FLAIR is faster and has better contrast characteristics but lacks sensitivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Electronic Publication

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tan, I., Pouwels, P., van Schijndel, R. et al. Isotropic 3D fast FLAIR imaging of the brain in multiple sclerosis patients: initial experience. Eur Radiol 12, 559–567 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1170-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-001-1170-8

Navigation