Skip to main content
Log in

Time-resolved echo-shared parallel MRA of the lung: observer preference study of image quality in comparison with non-echo-shared sequences

  • Chest
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the image quality of time-resolved echo-shared parallel MRA of the lung. The pulmonary vasculature of nine patients (seven females, two males; median age: 44 years) with pulmonary disease was examined using a time-resolved MRA sequence combining echo sharing with parallel imaging (time-resolved echo-shared angiography technique, or TREAT). The sharpness of the vessel borders, conspicuousness of peripheral lung vessels, artifact level, and overall image quality of TREAT was assessed independently by four readers in a side-by-side comparison with non-echo-shared time-resolved parallel MRA data (pMRA) previously acquired in the same patients. Furthermore, the SNR of pulmonary arteries (PA) and veins (PV) achieved with both pulse sequences was compared. The mean voxel size of TREAT MRA was decreased by 24% compared with the non-echo-shared MRA. Regarding the sharpness of the vessel borders, conspicuousness of peripheral lung vessels, and overall image quality the TREAT sequence was rated superior in 75–76% of all cases. If the TREAT images were preferred over the pMRA images, the advantage was rated as major in 61-71% of all cases. The level of artifacts was not increased with the TREAT sequence. The mean interobserver agreement for all categories ranged between fair (artifact level) and good (overall image quality). The maximum SNR of TREAT did not differ from non-echo-shared parallel MRA (PA: TREAT: 273±45; pMRA: 280±71; PV: TREAT: 273±33; pMRA: 258±62). TREAT achieves a higher spatial resolution than non-echo-shared parallel MRA which is also perceived as an improved image quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bock M, Schoenberg SO, Floemer F, Schad LR (2000) Separation of arteries and veins in 3D MR angiography using correlation analysis. Magn Reson Med 43:481–487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fink C, Ley S, Kroeker R, Requardt M, Kauczor HU, Bock M (2005) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of the chest: combination of parallel imaging with view sharing (TREAT). Invest Radiol 40:40–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fink C, Ley S, Puderbach M, Plathow C, Bock M, Kauczor HU (2004) 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI and MR angiography of pulmonary embolism in pigs after a single injection of a blood pool MR contrast agent. Eur Radiol 14:1291–1296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fink C, Puderbach M, Ley S et al (2004) Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional pulmonary perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: intraindividual comparison of 1.0 M gadobutrol and 0.5 M Gd-DTPA at three dose levels. Invest Radiol 39:143–148

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Finn JP, Baskaran V, Carr JC et al (2002) Thorax: low-dose contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with subsecond temporal resolution-initial results. Radiology 224:896–904

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Francois CJ, Shors SM, Bonow RO, Finn JP (2003) Analysis of cardiopulmonary transit times at contrast material-enhanced MR imaging in patients with heart disease. Radiology 227:447–452

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Goyen M, Laub G, Ladd ME et al (2001) Dynamic 3D MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries in under four seconds. J Magn Reson Imaging 13:372–377

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heidemann RM, Ozsarlak O, Parizel PM et al (2003) A brief review of parallel magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 13:2323–2337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, Mistretta CA (1996) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 36:345–351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Madore B, Pelc NJ (2002) New approach to 3D time-resolved angiography. Magn Reson Med 47:1022–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Madore B, Pelc NJ (2001) SMASH and SENSE: experimental and numerical comparisons. Magn Reson Med 45:1103–1111

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ohno Y, Kawamitsu H, Higashino T et al (2003) Time-resolved contrast-enhanced pulmonary MR angiography using sensitivity encoding (SENSE). J Magn Reson Imaging 17:330–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoenberg SO, Knopp MV, Grau A et al (1998) Ultraschnelle MR- Venographie der Lungen. Radiologe 38:597–605

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shors SM, Cotts WG, Pavlovic-Surjancev B, Francois CJ, Gheorghiade M, Finn JP (2003) Heart failure: evaluation of cardiopulmonary transit times with time-resolved MR angiography. Radiology 229:743–748

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Martin Requardt and Dr. Randall Kroeker of Siemens Medical Solutions for providing the experimental sequence. The help of Dr. Michael Bock for the optimization of the imaging protocol is also acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Fink.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fink, C., Puderbach, M., Ley, S. et al. Time-resolved echo-shared parallel MRA of the lung: observer preference study of image quality in comparison with non-echo-shared sequences. Eur Radiol 15, 2070–2074 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2831-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-005-2831-9

Keywords

Navigation