Skip to main content
Log in

Radiological diagnosis of incomplete partition type I versus type II: significance for cochlear implantation

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To investigate an extended cohort of patients with incomplete partition (IP) and examine the adequacy of the existing classifications based on radiological criteria and on their implications for cochlear implantation.

Methods

Patients with IP admitted to a tertiary referral centre during the period 2000–2010 were retrospectively examined. The subjects were initially classified into IP-I, IP-II and atypical cases. For cochlear implant recipients relevant aspects were analysed.

Results

Eighty-three ears (49 patients) with IP were found, 19 with IP-I, 54 with IP-II and 10 atypical. Thirty-three patients received a cochlear implant (11 with IP-I, 19 with IP-II and three atypical) achieving heterogeneous though mostly promising results. Cerebrospinal fluid gushing was the commonest surgical complication, particularly in cases of IP-I. In general, patients with IP-II performed better than those with IP-I.

Conclusions

Cochlear implantation promises adequate hearing rehabilitation for most patients with IP. As we move from IP-I to IP-II better results and lower risk for gushing shall be expected. Based on radiological findings we suggest a modified classification into IP-I, atypical IP-I (with large vestibular aqueduct (LVA) and better partition), IP-II (Mondini deformity) and atypical IP-IIa (without LVA) and b (without LVA but with semicircular canal dysplasia).

Key Points

Radiological (CT and MR) features are of crucial importance for cochlear implantation

Imaging can identify two types of incomplete cochlear partition and atypical cases

Detailed pre-operative radiological assessment can help predict complications and outcome

A more comprehensive radiological classification of these anomalies is proposed

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Papsin BC (2005) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope 115:1–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Chadha NK, James AL, Gordon KA, Blaser S, Papsin BC (2009) Bilateral cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 135:903–909

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sennaroglu L, Sarac S, Ergin T (2006) Surgical results of cochlear implantation in malformed cochlea. Otol Neurotol 27:615–623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jansen S (1969) Malformation of the inner ear in deaf children. Acta Radiol 286:S1–S97

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mangabeira-Albernaz PL (1983) The Mondini dysplasia–from early diagnosis to cochlear implant. Acta Otolaryngol 95:627–631

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 97:2–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sennaroglu L, Saatci I (2002) A new classification for cochleovestibular malformations. Laryngoscope 112:2230–2241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huang BY, Zdanski C, Castillo M (2011) Pediatric Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Part 2: Syndromic and Acquired Causes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2499

  9. Verloes A (2005) Updated diagnostic criteria for CHARGE syndrome: a proposal. Am J Med Genet A 133A:306–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Sound detection with the cochlear implant in five ears of four children with congenital malformations of the cochlea. Laryngoscope 97(Suppl 40):15–17

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Munro KJ, George CR, Haacke NP (1996) Audiological findings after multichannel cochlear implantation in patients with Mondini dysplasia. Br J Audiol 30:369–379

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Molter DW, Pate BR Jr, McElveen JT Jr (1993) Cochlear implantation in the congenitally malformed ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 108:174–177

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Slattery WH III, Luxford WM (1995) Cochlear implantation in the congenital malformed cochlea. Laryngoscope 105:1184–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Tucci DL, Telian SA, Zimmerman-Phillips S, Zwolan TA, Kileny PR (1995) Cochlear implantation in patients with cochlear malformations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 121:833–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Luntz M, Balkany T, Hodges AV, Telischi FF (1997) Cochlear implants in children with congenital inner ear malformations. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:974–977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Incesulu A, Vural M, Erkam U, Kocaturk S (2002) Cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations: report of two cases. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 65:171–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mylanus EA, Rotteveel LJ, Leeuw RL (2004) Congenital malformation of the inner ear and pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 25:308–317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Incesulu A, Adapinar B, Kecik C (2008) Cochlear implantation in cases with incomplete partition type III (X-linked anomaly). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 265:1425–1439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Wermeskerken GK, Dunnebier EA, Van Olphen AF, Van Zanten BA, Albers FW (2007) Audiological performance after cochlear implantation: a 2-year follow-up in children with inner ear malformations. Acta Otolaryngol 127:252–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Giesemann AM, Goetz F, Neuburger J, Lenarz T, Lanfermann H (2011) Appearance of hypoplastic cochleae in CT and MRI: a new subclassification. Neuroradiology 53:49–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zheng Y, Schachern PA, Cureoglu S, Mutlu C, Dijalilian H, Paparella MM (2002) The shortened cochlea: its classification and histopathologic features. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 63:29–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lo WW (1999) What is a ‘Mondini’ and what difference does a name make? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 20:1442–1444

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mondini C (1997) Minor works of Carlo Mondini: the anatomical section of a boy born deaf. Am J Otol 18:288–293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgios Kontorinis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kontorinis, G., Goetz, F., Giourgas, A. et al. Radiological diagnosis of incomplete partition type I versus type II: significance for cochlear implantation. Eur Radiol 22, 525–532 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2301-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2301-5

Keywords

Navigation