Skip to main content
Log in

Flat panel CT following stapes prosthesis insertion: an experimental and clinical study

European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Anatomical information of the middle and inner ear is becoming increasingly important in post-operative evaluation especially after stapesplasty with unsuccessful improvement of the air-bone gap (ABG). So far computed tomography (CT) has been the first choice for detection of reasons for recurrent hearing loss. CT has the disadvantage of metal-induced artefacts after insertion of middle ear implants and of a relatively high irradiation dose.

Methods

Flat panel CT (fpCT) was performed in three temporal bone specimen after experimental insertion of different stapes prostheses, aiming to validate the accuracy of fpCT of the middle and inner ear. Additionally, 28 consecutive patients, supplied with different stapes prostheses underwent post-operative fpCT to compare the pre- and post-operative hearing results with the determined prosthesis position in the middle and inner ear.

Results

In all cases, fpCT showed a statistically significant correlation between hearing improvement and prosthesis position. This technique provided detailed post-operative information of the implant position in patients and temporal bone specimen.

Conclusions

The new imaging technique of fpCT allows the immediate and almost artefact-free evaluation of surgical results following stapesplasty. Further benefits are a lower irradiation dose and higher isovolumetric resolution compared with standard CT.

Key Points

• Flat panel computed tomography (fpCT) helps otosurgeons design precise stapes protheses

• fpCT allows a prediction of the postoperative hearing outcome in patients

• fpCT is an adequate imaging technique for immediate postoperative quality control. Postoperative management of patients with prosthesis-related complications is more appropriate

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Huttenbrink KB (2003) Biomechanics of stapesplasty: a review. Otol Neurotol 24:548–557, discussion 557–549

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Golabek W, Szymanski M, Siwiec H, Morshed K (2003) Incus subluxation and luxation during stapedectomy. Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska Med 58:302–305

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Meyer SE (1999) The effect of stapes surgery on high frequency hearing in patients with otosclerosis. Am J Otol 20:36–40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Oberascher G, Grobovschek M (1988) Identification of middle ear implants in high-resolution computerized tomography. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg) 67:17–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kosling S, Bootz F (2001) CT and MR imaging after middle ear surgery. Eur J Radiol 40:113–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J (2009) Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol 20:566–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Naumann IC, Porcellini B, Fisch U (2005) Otosclerosis: incidence of positive findings on high-resolution computed tomography and their correlation to audiological test data. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:709–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Offergeld C, Pilling E, Lazurashvili N et al (2007) Conventional tomographic investigations of the reconstructed middle ear in temporal bone specimen. Laryngorhinootologie 86:501–506

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Aschendorff A et al (2007) Rotational tomography of the normal and reconstructed middle ear in temporal bones: an experimental study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Turowski B et al (2005) Quality control after cochlear implant surgery by means of rotational tomography. Otol Neurotol 26:34–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Merchant SN et al (2010) Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications. Hear Res 263(1–2):191–197

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hausler R (2007) General history of stapedectomy. Adv Otorhinolaryngol 65:1–5

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cremers CW, Beusen JM, Huygen PL (1991) Hearing gain after stapedotomy, partial platinectomy, or total stapedectomy for otosclerosis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 100:959–961

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Plath P, Lenart R, Matschke RG, Kruppa E (1992) Long-term results of stapedectomy and stapedotomy. HNO 40:52–55

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Fritsch MH (2007) MRI scanners and the stapes prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 28:733–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Chuang MT, Chiang IC, Liu GC et al (2006) Multidetector row CT demonstration of inner and middle ear structures. Clin Anat 19:337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rodt T, Ratiu P, Becker H et al (2002) 3D visualisation of the middle ear and adjacent structures using reconstructed multi-slice CT datasets, correlating 3D images and virtual endoscopy to the 2D cross-sectional images. Neuroradiology 44:783–790

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Pickuth D, Brandt S, Berghaus A, Spielmann RP, Heywang-Kobrunner SH (2000) Vertigo after stapes surgery: the role of high resolution CT. Br J Radiol 73:1021–1023

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Roosli C, Hoffmann A, Treumann T, Linder TE (2008) Significance of computed tomography evaluation before revision stapes surgery. HNO 56:895–900

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hahn Y, Diaz R, Hartman J, Bobinski M, Brodie H (2009) Assessing stapes piston position using computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Otol Neurotol 30:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Zaoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaoui, K., Kromeier, J., Neudert, M. et al. Flat panel CT following stapes prosthesis insertion: an experimental and clinical study. Eur Radiol 22, 837–844 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2317-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2317-x

Keywords

Navigation