Skip to main content
Log in

Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients

European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

After middle ear reconstruction using partial or total ossicular replacement prostheses (PORP/TORP), an air–bone gap (ABG) may persist because of prosthesis displacement or malposition. So far, CT of the temporal bone has played the main role in the diagnosis of reasons for postoperative insufficient ABG improvement. Recent experimental and clinical studies have evaluated flat panel CT (fpCT) as an alternative imaging technique that provides images with high isovolumetric resolution, fewer metal-induced artefacts and lower irradiation doses.

Methods

One hundred and seven consecutive patients with chronic otitis media with or without cholesteatoma underwent reconstruction by PORP (n = 52) or TORP (n = 55). All subjects underwent preoperative and postoperative audiometric testing and postoperative fpCT.

Results

Statistical evaluation of all 107 patients as well as the sole sub-assembly groups (PORP or TORP) showed a highly significant correlation between hearing improvement and fpCT-determined prosthesis position. FpCT enables detailed postoperative information on patients with middle ear reconstruction.

Conclusions

FpCT is a new imaging technique that provides immediate feedback on surgical results after reconstructive middle ear surgery. Specific parameters evaluated by fpCT may serve as a predictive tool for estimated postoperative hearing improvement. Therefore this imaging technique is suitable for postoperative quality control in reconstructive middle ear surgery.

Key Points

Flat panel CT offers advantages with regard to artefacts and radiation dose.

FpCT provides higher isovolumetric resolution of temporal bone and middle ear implants.

FpCT allows prediction of the postoperative hearing outcome in patients.

FpCT is an important tool for immediate postoperative quality control.

FpCT improves postoperative management of patients with complications following ossicular replacement

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  1. Begall K, Zimmermann H (2000) Reconstruction of the ossicular chain with titanium implants. Results of a multicenter study. Laryngorhinootologie 79:139–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Romaguera Lliso MD, Sanz Gonzalo JJ (2003) Cartilage palisades in type III tympanoplasty: anatomic and functional long-term results. Otol Neurotol 24:38–42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dost P, Wiemann M, ten Cate WJ (2005) Biomaterial studies in cultures of human stapedial bone-like cells. HNO 53:545–547

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sudhoff H, Lindner N, Gronemeyer J, Dazert S, Hildmann H (2005) Study of osteointegration of a titanium prosthesis to the stapes: observations on an accidentally extracted stapes. Otol Neurotol 26:583–586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Asai M, Huber AM, Goode RL (1999) Analysis of the best site on the stapes footplate for ossicular chain reconstruction. Acta Otolaryngol 119:356–361

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fisch U, May J, Linder T, Naumann IC (2004) A new L-shaped titanium prosthesis for total reconstruction of the ossicular chain. Otol Neurotol 25:891–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huttenbrink KB, Zahnert T, Wustenberg EG, Hofmann G (2004) Titanium clip prosthesis. Otol Neurotol 25:436–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN (1995) Mechanical and acoustic analysis of middle ear reconstruction. Am J Otol 16:486–497

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Schwager K (2002) Titanium as a material for ossicular replacement—basic aspects and clinical application. Laryngorhinootologie 81:178–183

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zahnert T, Huttenbrink KB (2005) Pitfalls in ossicular chain reconstruction. HNO 53:89–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Aschendorff A et al (2007) Rotational tomography of the normal and reconstructed middle ear in temporal bones: an experimental study. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 264:345–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bozzato A, Struffert T, Hertel V, Iro H, Hornung J (2010) Analysis of the accuracy of high-resolution computed tomography techniques for the measurement of stapes prostheses. Eur Radiol 20:566–571

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Naumann IC, Porcellini B, Fisch U (2005) Otosclerosis: incidence of positive findings on high-resolution computed tomography and their correlation to audiological test data. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:709–716

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aschendorff A, Kubalek R, Hochmuth A et al (2004) Imaging procedures in cochlear implant patients—evaluation of different radiological techniques. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 552:46–49

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zaoui K, Kromeier J, Neudert M et al (2012) Flat panel CT following stapes prosthesis insertion: an experimental and clinical study. Eur Radiol 22:837–844

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Offergeld C, Kromeier J, Merchant SN et al (2010) Experimental investigation of rotational tomography in reconstructed middle ears with clinical implications. Hear Res 263:191–197

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Offergeld C (2013) Quality control following reconstructive middle ear surgery: From bench to bedside. HNO

  18. De Vos C, Gersdorff M, Gerard JM (2007) Prognostic factors in ossiculoplasty. Otol Neurotol 28:61–67

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Morris DP, Bance M, van Wijhe RG, Kiefte M, Smith R (2004) Optimum tension for partial ossicular replacement prosthesis reconstruction in the human middle ear. Laryngoscope 114:305–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yung M (2006) Long-term results of ossiculoplasty: reasons for surgical failure. Otol Neurotol 27:20–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yung M, Vowler SL (2006) Long-term results in ossiculoplasty: an analysis of prognostic factors. Otol Neurotol 27:874–881

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodt T, Bartling S, Schmidt AM, Weber BP, Lenarz T, Becker H (2002) Virtual endoscopy of the middle ear: experimental and clinical results of a standardised approach using multi-slice helical computed tomography. Eur Radiol 12:1684–1692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ayache D, Williams MT (2003) Malleus handle fracture. Otol Neurotol 24:519–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chuang MT, Chiang IC, Liu GC, Lin WC (2006) Multidetector row CT demonstration of inner and middle ear structures. Clin Anat 19:337–344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Roosli C, Hoffmann A, Treumann T, Linder TE (2008) Significance of computed tomography evaluation before revision stapes surgery. HNO 56:895–900

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hahn Y, Diaz R, Hartman J, Bobinski M, Brodie H (2009) Assessing stapes piston position using computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Otol Neurotol 30:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bartling SH, Majdani O, Gupta R et al (2007) Large scan field, high spatial resolution flat-panel detector based volumetric CT of the whole human skull base and for maxillofacial imaging. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 36:317–327

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Trieger A, Schulze A, Schneider M, Zahnert T, Murbe D (2011) In vivo measurements of the insertion depth of cochlear implant arrays using flat-panel volume computed tomography. Otol Neurotol 32:152–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Zeitler DM, Wang KH, Prasad RS, Wang EY, Roland JT (2011) Flat-panel computed tomography versus multislice computed tomography to evaluate cochlear implant positioning. Cochlear Implants Int 12:216–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Offergeld C, Pilling E, Lazurashvili N et al (2007) Conventional tomographic investigations of the reconstructed middle ear in temporal bone specimen. Laryngorhinootologie 86:501–506

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Choi HG, Lee DH, Chang KH, Yeo SW, Yoon SH, Jun BC (2011) Frequency-specific hearing results after surgery for chronic ear diseases. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 4:126–130

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Zaoui.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zaoui, K., Kromeier, J., Neudert, M. et al. Clinical investigation of flat panel CT following middle ear reconstruction: a study of 107 patients. Eur Radiol 24, 587–594 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3068-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-013-3068-7

Keywords

Navigation