Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Posterior epistaxis: endonasal exposure and occlusion of the branches of the sphenopalatine artery

  • Rhinology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intractable posterior epistaxis (PE) is a frequent emergency for which different treatment modalities are available. While nasal packing causes extreme discomfort and angiography with consecutive selective embolization is not available everywhere, recent studies emphasize the value of sphenopalatine artery (SPA) occlusion by different techniques and indicate success rates of 13–33%. In our institution, previously endoscopic management of PE consisted either of isolated coagulation of an identified bleeding source (group A) or cutting and coagulation of arterial branches running through the sphenopalatine foramen (SPF) (group B). According to our neuroradiological and rhinological experience we developed a modification of SPA transsection and coagulation following identification of the division in conchal and septal branches of the SPA (group C). During a 26-month period the success rates of these three techniques in 95 patients were compared prospectively. The three modalities revealed a re-bleeding rate of 3 out of 21 (21%) in group A, 1 in 6 (16.7%) in group B and 3 in 69 (4.3%) in group C. At the level of the SPF, 36 out of 69 patients had one conchal branch, whereas 30 (43.5%) had two and 3 (4.4%) had three. If SPA transsection and coagulation for intractable PE is adopted the anatomic varieties of the SPA with its division in conchal and septal branches have to be taken into account. According to our experience the septal branch of the SPA plays a major role in PE. Its occlusion significantly improves the success rate of PE treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Balrow DW, Deleyiannis WB, Pinczower EF (1997) Effectiveness of surgical management of epistaxis at a tertiary care center. Laryngoscope 107: 21–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Breda SD, Choi IS, Persky MS, Weiss M (1989) Embolization in the treatment of epistaxis after failure of internal maxillary artery ligation. Laryngoscope 99: 809–813

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Budrovich M, Saetti R (1992) Microscopic and endoscopic ligature of the sphenopalatine artery. Laryngoscope 102: 1390–1394

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chandler JR, Serrins AJ (1965) Transantral ligation of the internal maxillary artery of epistaxis. Laryngoscope 75: 1151–1159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Elden L, Montanera W, TerBrugge K, Willinsky R, Lasjaunias P, Chalres D (1994) Angiographic embolization for the treatment of epistaxis: a review of 108 cases. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 111: 44–50

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lang J (1988). Klinische Anatomie der Nase, Nasenhöhle und Nasennebenhöhlen. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, New York, pp 102–105

  7. Lasjaunias P, Vignaud J, Hasso AN (1975) Maxillary artery blood supply to the orbit: normal and pathological aspects. Neuroradiology 9: 87–97

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mc Donald TJ, Pearson PW (1980) Follow-up on maxillary artery ligation for epistaxis. Arch Otolaryngol 106: 635–638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Merland JJ, Melki JP, Chiras J (1982) Place of embolization in the treatment of severe epistaxis. J Otolaryngol 11: 271–274

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Metson R, Hanson DG (1983) Bilateral facial nerve paralysis following arterial embolization for epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 91: 299–303

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Montgomery WW, Reardon EJ (1980) Early vessel ligation for control of severe epistaxis. In: Snow JB Jr (ed) Controversies in otolaryngology. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 315–319

  12. O'Flynn PE, Shadaba A (2000) Management of posterior epistaxis by endoscoic clipping of the sphenopalatine artery. Clin Otolaryngol 25: 374–377

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Parnes LS, Heeneman H, Vinuela F (1987) Percutaneous embolization for control of nasal blood circulation. Laryngoscope 97: 1312–1315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Prades J (1976) Abord endonasal de la fosse pterygo-maxillaire. LXXIII Cong Franc Compt Rendus des Seance: 290–296

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rockey JG, Anand R (2002) A critical audit of the surgical management of intractable epistaxis using sphenopalatine artery ligation/diathermy. Rhinology 40: 147–149

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Snyderman CH, Goldman SA, Carrau RL, Ferguson BJ Grandis JR (1999) Endoscopic sphenopalatine artery ligation is an effective method of treatment for posterior epistaxis. Am J Rhinol 13: 137–140

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Sokoloff J, Wickbom I, McDonald D (1974) Therapeutic percutaneous embolization in intractable epistaxis. Radiology 111: 285–287

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Strutz J Schumacher M (1990) Uncontrollable epistaxis. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116: 697–699

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Valavanis A, Setton A (1993) Embolization of epistaxis. In: Valavanis A (ed) Interventional neuroradiolergy. Spinger, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp 55–61

  20. Vitek JJ (1991) Idiopathic intractable epistaxis: endovascular therapy. Radiology 181: 113–116

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Voegels RL, Thomé DC, Iturralde PPV, Butugan OB (2001) Endoscopic ligature of the sphenopalatine artery for severe posterior epistaxis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 124: 464–467

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Weaver EM, Chaloupka JC, Putman CM, Roth TC, Horky JK, Sasaki CT (1999) Effect of internal maxillary arterial occlusion on nasal blood flow in swine. Laryngoscope 109: 8–14

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Welsh LW, Welsh JJ, Scogna JE, Gregor FA (1990) Role of angiography in the management of refractory epistaxis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 99: 69–73

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Zürich, Frauenklinikstr. 24, 8091 , Zürich, Switzerland

    David Holzmann, Thomas Kaufmann & Paula Pedrini

  2. Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Anton Valavanis

Authors
  1. David Holzmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Kaufmann
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paula Pedrini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anton Valavanis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Holzmann.

Additional information

For this study, neither financial support nor funding was given.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holzmann, D., Kaufmann, T., Pedrini, P. et al. Posterior epistaxis: endonasal exposure and occlusion of the branches of the sphenopalatine artery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 260, 425–428 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-003-0618-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-003-0618-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation