Skip to main content
Log in

Finite-element models of the human head and their applications in forensic practice

  • Review Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the 1960s, predictive human head impact indices have been developed to help the investigation of causation of human head injury. Finite-element models (FEM) can provide interesting tools for the forensic scientists when various human head injury mechanisms need to be evaluated. Human head FEMs are mainly used for car crash evaluations and are not in common use in forensic science. Recent technological progress has resulted in creating more simple tools, which will certainly help to consider the use of FEM in routine forensic practice in the coming years. This paper reviews the main FEMs developed and focuses on the models which can be used as predictive tools. Their possible applications in forensic medicine are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cory CZ, Jones MD, James DS, Leadbeatter S, Nokes LD (2001) The potential and limitations of utilising head impact injury models to assess the likelihood of significant head injury in infants after a fall. Forensic Sci Int 123(2–3):89–106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ward CC, Thompson RB (1975) The development of a detailed finite element brain model. In: Proceedings 19th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper, vol 751163. SAE, New York, pp 641–674

  3. Shugar TA, Kahona MC (1975) Development of finite element head injury model. J ASCE 101:223–239

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hosey RR, Liu YK (1980) A homeomorphic finite element model of impact head and neck injury. In: Simon BR (ed) Proceedings of International Conference on Finite Element Biomechanics, Tucson, pp 851–870

  5. Dimasi F, Marcus J, Eppinger R (1991) 3D anatomic brain model for relating cortical strains to automobile crash loading. In: Proc. of the International Technical Conference on Experimental Safety Vehicles, Washington US Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, vol 2. pp 916–923

  6. Mendis K (1992) Finite element modeling of the brain to establish diffuse axonal injury criteria. PhD Dissertation, Ohio State University

  7. Gennarelli AT, Thibault EL (1982) Acceleration damage to the brain. In: Proceedings of the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. AGARD-Conference Proceedings-322, NASA

  8. Ruan JS, Khalil T, King AI (1992) Finite element analysis of the human head to impact. Adv Bioeng ASME-BED:69–91

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ruan JS, Khalil T, King AI (1993) Finite element modeling of direct head impact. In: Proceedings 37th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper, vol 933114. pp 69–81

  10. Zhou C, Kahlil TB, Dragovic LJ (1996) Head injury assessment of a real world crash by finite element modelling. Proceedings of the Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. AGARD-Conference Proceedings, New Mexico, November 1996, pp 81–87

  11. Zhang L, King KH, Dwarampudi R, Omori K, Li TB, Hardy W, Khalil T, King AI (2001) Recent advances in brain injury research: a new human head model development and validation. In: Proceedings 45th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE Paper 2001-22-0017, pp 375–400

  12. King A, Yang K, Zhang L, Hardy W (2003) Is head injury caused by linear or angular acceleration? In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Lisbon, pp 1–12

  13. Claessens M, Sauren F, Wismans J (1997) Modelling of the human head under impact conditions: a parametric study. In: Proceedings 41st Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper vol 973338, pp 315–328

  14. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PH, Wismans JSHM (2002) On the potential importance of non-linear viscoelastic material modelling for numerical prediction of brain tissue response. In: Proceedings 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper vol 2002-22-0006, pp 103–121

  15. Brands DW (2002) Predicting brain mechanics during closed head impact—Numerical and constitutive aspects. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Eindhoven, The Netherlands

  16. Kang HS, Willinger R, Diaw B, Chinn B (1997) Validation of a 3D anatomic human head model and replication of head impact in motorcycle accident by finite element modelling. Proceedings 41th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 973339, pp 329–338

  17. Khalil TB, Viano DC (1982) Critical issues in finite element modelling of head impact. Proceedings 26th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 821150, pp 87–102

  18. Willinger R, Baumgartner D (2003) Human head tolerance limits to specific injury mechanisms. Int J Crashworthiness 8:605–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Marjoux D, Baumgartner D, Deck C, Willinger R (2008) Head injury prediction capability of the HIC, HIP, SIMon and ULP criteria. Accident Anal Prev DOI 10.1016/j.aap.2007.12.006

  20. Raul JS, Deck C, Meyer F, Géraut A, Willinger R, Ludes B (2007) A finite element model investigation of gunshot injury. Int J Legal Med 121:143–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Deck C, Nicolle S, Willinger R (2004) Human head FE modelling: improvement of skull geometry and brain constitutive laws. In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Graz, pp 79–92

  22. Nicolle S, Lounis M, Willinger R (2004) Shear properties of brain tissue over a frequency range relevant for automotive impact situations: New experimental results. Stapp Car Crash J 48:1–20

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kleiven S, Hardy W (2002) Correlation of an FE model of the human head with local brain motion—consequences for injury prediction. In: Proceedings 46th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 2002-22-0007, pp 123–144

  24. Mendis KK, Stalnaker RL, Advani SH (1995) A constitutive relationship for large deformation finite element modelling of brain tissue. J Biomech Eng 117:279–285

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kleiven S, Von Holst H (2001) Consequences of brain size following impact in prediction of subdural hematoma evaluated with numerical techniques. In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Isle of Man, pp 161–172

  26. Kleiven S (2007) Predictors for traumatic brain injuries evaluated through accident reconstructions. In: Proceedings 51th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 2007-22-0003, pp 81–114

  27. Bandak FA, Eppinger RH (1994) A three dimensional finite element analysis of the human brain under combined rotational and translational acceleration. In: Proceedings 38th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 942215, pp 145–163

  28. Bandak FA, Zhang AX, Tannous RE, DiMasi F, Masiello P, Eppinger R (2001) Simon: a simulated injury monitor; application to head injury assessment. In: Proceedings 17th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC

  29. Dimasi FP, Eppinger RH, Bandak FA (1995) Computational analysis of head impact response under car crash loadings. Proceedings 39th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 52718, pp 425–438

  30. Takhounts E, Eppinger R (2003) On the development of the SIMon finite element head model. In: Proceedings 47th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 03S-04, pp 107–133

  31. Horgan TJ, Gilchrist M (2003) The creation of three-dimensional finite element models for simulating head impact biomechanics. Int J Crashworthiness 8:353–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gilchrist M, Horgan TJ (2004) Influence of FE model variability in predicting brain motion and intracranial pressure changes in head impact simulations. Int J Crashworthiness 9:401–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kimpara H, Nakahira Y, Iwamoto M, Miki K, Ichihara K, Kawano Taguchi T (2006) Investigation of anteroposterior head–neck responses during severe frontal impacts using a brain–spinal cord complex FE model. In: Proceedings 50th Stapp Car Crash Conference, pp 509–544

  34. Raul JS, Baumgartner D, Willinger R, Ludes B (2006) Finite element modelling of human head injuries caused by a fall. Int J Legal Med 120(4):212–218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Pintar FA, Kumaresan S, Yoganandan N, Yang A, Stemper B, Gennarelli TA (2001) Biomechanical modeling of penetrating traumatic head injuries: a finite element approach. Biomed Sci Instrum 37:429–434

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Gennarelli TA (2006) Experimental and finite element modeling of penetrating traumatic brain injury. In: Proceedings of International Conference on the Biomechanics of Impact, Madrid, pp 93–101

  37. Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Zollinger U, Dirnhofer R (2002) The “Skin–skull–brain model”: a new instrument for the study of gunshot effects. Forensic Sci Int 125:178–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thali MJ, Kneubuehl BP, Vock P, Allmen GV, Dirnhofer R (2002) High-speed documented experimental gunshot to a skull–brain model and radiologic virtal autopsy. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 23(3):223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Harvey EN, Korr IM, Oster G (1947) Secondary damage in wounding due to pressure changes accompanying the passage of high velocity missiles. Surgery 21:218–239

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Margulies SS, Thibault LE, Gennarelli TA (1990) Physical model simulations of brain injury in the primate. J Biomech 23(8):823–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PHM, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM (2000) The large shear strain dynamic behaviour of in-vitro porcine brain tissue and silicon gel model material. In: Proceedings 44th Stapp Car Crash Conference, SAE paper, vol 2000-01-SC17, pp 249–260

  42. Ivarsson J, Viano DC, Lovsund P (2002) Influence of the lateral ventricles and irregular skull base on brain kinematics due to sagittal plane head rotation. J Biomech Eng 124:422–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brands DWA, Bovendeerd PHM, Peters GWM, Wismans JSHM, Paas MHJW, Bree JLMJ (1999) Comparison of the dynamic behaviour of brain tissue and two model materials. In: 43rd Stapp Car Crash Conference, San Diego

  44. Sarron JC, Caillou JP, Da Cunha J, Allain JC, Trameçon A (2000) Consequences of nonpenetrating projectile impact on a protected head: study of rear effects of protections. J Trauma 49(5):923–429

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Raul JS, Baumgartner D, Willinger R, Ludes B (2004) Finite element modeling of impacts of ballistic projectiles to the human head. J Med Legale Droit Med 47(8):397–401

    Google Scholar 

  46. Aare M, Kleiven S (2007) Evaluation of head response to ballistic helmet imlpacts using the finite element method. Int J Impact Eng 34:596–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Sébastien Raul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raul, JS., Deck, C., Willinger, R. et al. Finite-element models of the human head and their applications in forensic practice. Int J Legal Med 122, 359–366 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0248-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-008-0248-0

Keywords

Navigation