Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Facilities available in French hospitals treating acute stroke patients: comparison with 24 other European countries

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the proportion of French hospitals meeting criteria for primary (PSC) or comprehensive (CSC) stroke centres, with that of 24 other European countries. We surveyed 121 randomly selected hospitals admitting stroke patients routinely in France and 765 in other European countries. We determined the proportion of hospitals meeting criteria for CSC and PSC according to the EUSI experts definition. The 121 selected hospitals had treated 37,778 patients in 2005 (mean 312), i.e. approximately 25% of all strokes supposed to have occurred in France. Eleven hospitals had an acute stroke care unit, versus 448 of 765 other Hospitals (OR 0.07; 95% CI, OR 0.04–0.13). rt-PA was given to 622 patients (2.2% of ischaemic strokes, versus 3.3% for the other countries). No hospital met criteria for CSC, and only 2 (1.7%) met criteria for PSC. Many facilities considered as necessary by experts were less available, especially personnel, brain CT-scan, ECG monitoring and rt-PA protocols. However, CT angiography 24 h/24, and air ambulance were more often available. Only a few French hospitals offer an optimal level of care for stroke patients. This result contrasts with the high cost of stroke care in France, suggesting an inappropriate use of resources. Conclusions useful for health administrators are: (i) to offer more facilities in reasonably equipped hospitals; (ii) to prevent admission of stroke patients in small under-equipped hospitals; (iii) to promote specific stroke nurse instruction; and (iv) to promote a better organisation of stroke care over the territory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berlit P, Busse O, Diener H, Haberl R, Hacke W, Harms L, Grotemeyer K, Kaps M, Kessler C, Ringelstein E, für-die-Kommission-1.06 (1998) Empfehlungen für die Einrichtung von Schlaganfallspezialstationen (“Stroke Units”). Der Nervenarzt 69:180–185

    Google Scholar 

  2. Evans A, Perez I, Harraf F, Melbourn A, Steadman J, Donaldson N, Kalra L (2001) Can differences in management processes explain different outcomes between stroke unit and stroke-team care? Lancet 358:1586–1592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Grieve R, Hutton J, Bhalla A, Rastenyte D, Ryglewicz D, Sarti C, Lamassa M, Giroud M, Dundas R, Wolfe CD (2001) A comparison of the costs and survival of hospital-admitted stroke patients across Europe. Stroke 32:1684–1691

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hankey GJ, Warlow CP (1999) Treatment and secondary prevention of stroke: evidence, costs, and effects on individuals and populations. Lancet 354:1457–1463

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jepson C, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Ubel PA (2005) In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. J Clin Epidemiol 58:103–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Langhorne P, Pollock A (2002) What are the components of effective stroke unit care? Age Ageing 31:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Langhorne P, Williams BO, Gilchrist W, Howie K (1993) Do stroke units save lives? Lancet 342:395–398

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Leys D, Ringelstein EB, Kaste M, Hacke W (2007) Facilities available in European hospitals treating stroke patients. Stroke 38:2985–2991

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Leys D, Ringelstein EB, Kaste M, Hacke W (2007) The main components of Stroke Unit Care: results of a European expert survey. Cerebrovasc Dis 23:344–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ringelstein E, Berlit P, Busse O, Diener H, Grotemeyer K, Haberl R, Hacke W, Harms L, Kaps M, Kessler C, für-die-Kommission-1.06 (2000) Konzept der überregionalen und regionalen Schlaganfallversorgung in Deutschland. Akt Neurologie 27:101–103

  11. Stroke-Unit-Trialists’-Collaboration (2002) Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000197

  12. Stroke-Unit-Trialists-Collaboration (1997) How do stroke units improve patient outcomes? A collaborative systematic review of the randomized trials. Stroke 28:2139–2144

  13. Wahlgren N, Ahmed N, Davalos A, Ford GA, Grond M, Hacke W, Hennerici MG, Kaste M, Kuelkens S, Larrue V, Lees KR, Roine RO, Soinne L, Toni D, Vanhooren G (2007) Thrombolysis with alteplase for acute ischaemic stroke in the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST): an observational study. Lancet 369:275–282

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Woimant F, De Broucker T, Vassel P (2003) Prise en charge des accidents vasculaires cérébraux en France métropolitaine. Résultats de 3 enquêtes nationales. Rev Neurol (Paris) 159:543–551

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was funded by an unrestricted research grant provided by Novo Nordisk to the EUSI. The sponsor had no role in the collection and analysis of data, nor in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. No information concerning any drug from the sponsor was recorded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Leys.

Additional information

EUSI executive committee members Werner Hacke (Chairman), Michael Brainin (Secretary), Rolf Schneider (Treasurer), Markku Kaste, Angel Chamorro, Kennedy Lees, Didier Leys, Jose Ferro, Danilo Toni.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leys, D., Cordonnier, C., Debette, S. et al. Facilities available in French hospitals treating acute stroke patients: comparison with 24 other European countries. J Neurol 256, 867–873 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5029-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5029-2

Keywords

Navigation