Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A practical assessment of magnetic resonance diffusion-perfusion mismatch in acute stroke: observer variation and outcome

  • Original Communication
  • Published:
Journal of Neurology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

MR diffusion/perfusion mismatch may help identify patients for acute stroke treatment, but mixed results from clinical trials suggest that further evaluation of the mismatch concept is required. To work effectively, mismatch should predict prognosis on arrival at hospital. We assessed mismatch duration and associations with functional outcome in acute stroke. We recruited consecutive patients with acute stroke, recorded baseline clinical variables, performed MR diffusion and perfusion imaging and assessed 3-month functional outcome. We assessed practicalities, agreement between mismatch on mean transit time (MTT) or cerebral blood flow (CBF) maps, visually and with lesion volume, and the relationship of each to functional outcome. Of 82 patients starting imaging, 14 (17%) failed perfusion imaging. Overall, 42% had mismatch (56% at <6 h; 41% at 12–24 h; 23% at 24–48 h). Agreement for mismatch by visual versus volume assessment was fair using MTT (kappa 0.59, 95% CI 0.34–0.84) but poor using CBF (kappa 0.24, 95% CI 0.01–0.48). Mismatch by either definition was not associated with functional outcome, even when the analysis was restricted to just those with mismatch. Visual estimation is a reasonable proxy for mismatch volume on MTT but not CBF. Perfusion is more difficult for acute stroke patients than diffusion imaging. Mismatch is present in many patients beyond 12 h after stroke. Mismatch alone does not distinguish patients with good and poor prognosis; both can do well or poorly. Other factors, e.g. reperfusion, may influence outcome more strongly, even in patients without mismatch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4a, b

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, Kemp S, Schlaug G, Skalabrin E, Bammer R, Kakuda W, Lansberg MG, Shuaib A, Coplin W, Hamilton S, Moseley M, Marks MP, for the DEFUSE investigators (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 60:508–517

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ay H, Arsava EM, Vangel M, Oner B, Zhu M, Wu O, Singhal A, Koroshetz WJ, Sorensen AG (2008) Interexaminer difference in infarct volume measurements on MRI: a source of variance in stroke research. Stroke 39:1171–1176

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ay H, Koroshetz WJ, Vangel M, Benner T, Melinosky C, Zhu M, Menezes N, Lopez CJ, Sorensen AG (2005) Conversion of ischemic brain tissue into infarction increases with age. Stroke 36:2632–2636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C (1991) Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction. Lancet 337:1521–1526

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bandera E, Botteri M, Minelli C, Sutton A, Abrams KR, Latronico N (2006) Cerebral blood flow threshold of ischemic penumbra and infarct core in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 37:1334–1339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Butcher KS, Parsons M, MacGregor L, Barber PA, Chalk J, Bladin C, Levi C, Kimber T, Schultz D, Fink J, Tress B, Donnan G, Davis S, for the EPITHET Investigators (2005) Refining the perfusion-diffusion mismatch hypothesis. Stroke 36:1153–1159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Carpenter T, Armitage PA, Bastin ME, Wardlaw JM (2006) DSC perfusion MRI—quantification and reduction of systematic errors arising in areas of reduced cerebral blood flow. Magn Reson Med 55:1342–1349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Coutts SB, Simon JE, Tomanek AI, Barber PA, Chan J, Hudon ME, Mitchell R, Frayne R, Eliasziw M, Buchan AM, Demchuk AM (2003) Reliability of assessing percentage of diffusion-perfusion mismatch. Stroke 34:1681–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Darby DG, Barber PA, Gerraty RP, Desmond PM, Yang Q, Parsons M, Li T, Tress BM, Davis SM (1999) Pathophysiological topography of acute ischemia by combined diffusion-weighted and perfusion MRI. Stroke 30:2043–2052

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis SM, Donnan G, Parsons MW, Levi C, Butcher KS, Peeters A, Barber PA, Bladin C, De Silva DA, Byrnes G, Chalk JB, Fink JN, Kimber TE, Schultz D, Hand PJ, Frayne J, Hankey G, Muir K, Gerraty R, Tress BM, Desmond PM, for the EPIC Investigators (2008) Effects of alteplase beyond 3 h after stroke in the Echoplanar Imaging Thrombolytic Evaluation Trial (EPITHET): a placebo-controlled randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 7:299–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Furlan AJ, Eyding D, Albers GW, Al Rawi Y, Lees KR, Rowley HA, Sachara C, Soehngen M, Warach S, Hacke W (2006) Dose escalation of desmoteplase for acute ischemic stroke (DEDAS): evidence of safety and efficacy 3–9 h after stroke onset. Stroke 37:1227–1231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hacke W, Albers G, Al Rawi Y, Bogousslavsky J, Davalos A, Eliasziw M, Fischer M, Furlan A, Kaste M, Lees KR, Soehngen M, Warach S (2005) The Desmoteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke Trial (DIAS): a phase II MRI-based 9-h window acute stroke thrombolysis trial with intravenous desmoteplase. Stroke 36:66–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hand PJ, Kwan J, Lindley RI, Dennis MS, Wardlaw JM (2006) Distinguishing between stroke and mimic at the bedside: the brain attack study. Stroke 37:769–775

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hand PJ, Wardlaw JM, Rowat AM, Haisma JA, Lindley RI, Dennis MS (2005) Magnetic resonance brain imaging in patients with acute stroke: feasibility and patient-related difficulties. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 76:1525–1527

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kane I, Carpenter T, Chappell F, Rivers C, Armitage PA, Sandercock PAG, Wardlaw JM (2007) Comparison of 10 different magnetic resonance perfusion imaging processing methods in acute ischemic stroke: effect on lesion size, proportion of patients with diffusion/perfusion mismatch, clinical scores and radiological outcomes. Stroke 38:3158–3164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kane I, Sandercock P, Wardlaw J (2007) Magnetic resonance perfusion diffusion mismatch and thrombolysis in acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review of the evidence to date. J Neurol Neurosug Psychiatry 78:485–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lindgren A, Staaf G, Geijer B, Brockstedt S, Stahlberg F, Holtas S, Norrving B (2000) Clinical lacunar syndromes as predictors of lacunar infarcts: a comparison of acute clinical lacunar syndromes and findings on diffusion-weighted MRI. Acta Neurol Scand 101:128–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mead GE, Lewis S, Wardlaw JM, Dennis MS, Warlow CP (1999) Should computed tomography appearance of lacunar stroke influence patient management? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 67:682–684

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Phan TG, Donnan GA, Davis SM, Byrnes G (2006) Proof-of-principle phase II MRI studies in stroke: sample size estimates from dichotomous and continuous data. MR Stroke Group. Stroke 37:2521–2525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rha J, Saver JL (2007) The impact of recanalization on ischemic stroke outcome: a meta-analysis. Stroke 38:967–973

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rivers CS, Wardlaw JM, Armitage P, Bastin ME, Carpenter TK, Cvoro V, Hand PJ, Dennis MS (2006) Do acute diffusion- and perfusion-weighted MRI lesions identify final infarct volume in ischemic stroke? Stroke 37:98–104

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schellinger PD, Jansen O, Fiebach JB, Heiland S, Steiner T, Schwab S, Pohlers O, Ryssel H, Sartor K, Hacke W (2000) Monitoring intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke with diffusion and perfusion MRI. Stroke 31:1318–1328

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schellinger PD, Thomalla G, Fiehler J, Kohrmann M, Molina CA, Neumann-Haefelin T, Ribo M, Singer OC, Zaro-Weber O, Sobesky J (2007) MRI-based and CT-based thrombolytic therapy in acute stroke within and beyond established time windows: an analysis of 1,210 patients. Stroke 38:2640–2645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Strong AJ, Anderson PJ, Watts HR, Virley DJ, Lloyd A, Irving EA, Nagafuji T, Ninomiya M, Nakamura H, Dunn AK, Graf R (2007) Peri-infarct depolarizations lead to loss of perfusion in ischaemic gyrencephalic cerebral cortex. Brain 130:995–1008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive (CZB/4/14), the Royal Society of Edinburgh/Lloyds TSB Foundation (Dr C Rivers), the Row Fogo Charitable Trust (Dr Armitage), The Health Foundation (Dr Kane) and the Scottish Funding Council through the SINAPSE Collaboration (Scottish Imaging Network, A Platform for Scientific Excellence, http://www.sinapse.ac.uk, JMW). The imaging was performed in the SFC Brain Imaging Research Centre, University of Edinburgh (http://www.dcn.ed.ac.uk/bic), which is also supported by the SINAPSE Collaboration. We thank Dr Steff Lewis, Senior Lecturer in Statistics, Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility, University of Edinburgh, for statistical advice.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Wardlaw.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kane, I., Hand, P.J., Rivers, C. et al. A practical assessment of magnetic resonance diffusion-perfusion mismatch in acute stroke: observer variation and outcome. J Neurol 256, 1832–1838 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5202-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-009-5202-7

Keywords

Navigation