Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Imaging findings of Pott’s disease

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tuberculosis (TB) continues to be an important public health problem in developed countries especially in deprived socioeconomic groups, older people, immunocompromised patients, drug-therapy resistant cases and the immigrant population. The spine is the most frequent location of musculoskeletal TB. The wide range of clinical presentations results in difficulties and delays in diagnosis. Advanced disease mimics other infections and malignancy. The diagnosis of spinal infections relies on three main factors: clinical symptoms, imaging and bacteriological culture. Advanced imaging such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) and Fluor18-Deoxiglucose Positron Emission Tomography combined with CT (F-18 FDG PET–CT) demonstrate lesion extent, serve as guide for biopsy with aspiration for culture, assist surgery planning and contribute to follow-up. Diagnosis of TB cannot be established solely on the basis of clinical tests or imaging findings and biopsy may be required. Differential diagnosis between tuberculous and pyogenic spondylitis is of clinical importance, but may be difficult on the basis of radiological findings alone. Findings not pathognomonic but favoring tuberculous etiology include: slow progression of lesions with late preservation of disk space, involvement of several contiguous segments, large intraosseous and paraspinal abscesses containing calcifications, and body collapse with kyphotic deformity. In this essay the highlights of TB imaging are reviewed through published literature. In addition, we review retrospectively the radiological findings of 48 patients with tuberculous spondylitis treated from 1993 to 2010. There were 23 male and 25 female patients with a mean age of 53 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jevtic V (2004) Vertebral infection. Eur Radiol 14:E43–E52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cormican L, Hammal R, Messenger J, Milburn HJ (2006) Current difficulties in the diagnosis and management of spinal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med J 82:46–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jain R, Sawhney S, Berry M (1993) Computed tomography of vertebral tuberculosis: patterns of bone destruction. Clin Radiol 47:196–199

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lindahl S, Nyman RS, Brismar J, Hugosson C, Lundstedt C (1996) Imaging of tuberculosis. IV. Spinal manifestations in 63 patients. Acta Radiol 37:506–511

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Moore SL, Rafii M (2001) Imaging of musculoskeletal and spinal tuberculosis. Radiol Clin North Am 39(2):329–342

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Polley P, Dunn R (2009) Noncontiguous spinal tuberculosis: incidence and management. Eur Spine J 18:1096–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharif HS, Clarck DC, Aabed MY, Haddad MC, Al-Deeb SM, Yakub B, Al-Moutaery KR (1990) Granulomatous spinal infections: MR imaging. Radiology 177:101–107

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tins BJ, Di PL, Cassar-Pullicino VN (2004) MR imaging of spinal infection. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 8(3):215–229

    Google Scholar 

  9. De Vuyst D, Vanhoenacker F, Gielen J, Bernaerts A, De Schepper AM (2003) Imaging features of musculoskeletal tuberculosis. Eur Radiol 13:1809–1819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ousehal A, Gharbi A, Zamiati W, Saidi A, Kadiri R (2002) Imagerie di Mal de Pott. Neurochirurgie 48(5):409–418

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Danchaivijitr N, Temram S, Thepmonggkhol K, Chiewvit M (2007) Diagnostic accuracy of MR imaging in tuberculous spondylitis. J Med Assoc Thai 90(8):1581–1589

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith A, Weinstein MA, Mizuschima A, Coughin B, Hayden SP, Lakin MM, Lanzieri CF (1989) MR imaging characteristics of tuberculous spondylitis vs vertebral osteomyelitis. AJR 153:399–405

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Boxer DI, Pratt C, Hine AL, McNicol M (1992) Radiological features during and following treatment of spinal tuberculosis. Br J Radiol 65:476–479

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harisinghani M, McLoud T, Shepard JA, Ko J, Shroff M, Mueller P (2000) Tuberculosis from head to toe. Radiographics 20:449–470

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yusof MI, Hassan E, Rahmat N, Yunus R (2009) Spinal tuberculosis. Spine 34(7):713–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shanley DJ (1995) Tuberculosis of the spine: imaging features. AJR 164:659–664

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Dinç H, Ahmetoglu A, Baykal S, Sari A, Sayil Ö, Gümele HR (2002) Image-guided percutaneous drainage of tuberculous iliopsoas and spondilodiskitic abscesses: midterm results. Radiology 225:353–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Messenger HJ, Milburn HJ (2006) Current difficulties in the diagnosis and management of spinal tuberculosis. Postgrad Med 82:46–51

    Google Scholar 

  19. Desai SS (1994) Early diagnosis of spinal tuberculosis by MRI. J Bone Joint Surg 76B(6):863–869

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moorthy S, Prabhu N (2002) Spectrum of MR imaging findings in spinal tuberculosis. AJR 179:979–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tali ET (2004) Spinal infections. Eur J Radiol 50:120–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hatem SF, Schils JP (2000) Imaging of infections and inflammatory conditions of the spine. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 4(3):329–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. LaBerge JM, Brant-Zawadzki M (1984) Evaluation of Pott’s disease with computed tomography. Neuroradiol 26:429–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Burrill J, Williams C, Bains G, Conder G, Hine A, Misra R (2007) Tuberculosis: a radiologic review. Radiographics 27:1255–1273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Forrester DM (2004) Infectious spondylitis. Semin Ultrasound CT MRI 25:461–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Babhulkar SS, Tayade WB, Babhulkar SK (1984) Atypical spinal tuberculosis. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 66-B(2):294–296

    Google Scholar 

  27. Yalniz E, Pekindil G, Aktas S (2000) Atypical tuberculosis of the spine. Yonsei Med J 41(5):657–661

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Jain AK (2010) Tuberculosis of the spine. A fresh look at an old disease. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 92B:905–913

    Google Scholar 

  29. Blanco R, Ojala R, Kariniemi J, Niinimaki J, Tervonen O (2005) Interventional and intraoperative MRI at low field scanner, a review. Eur J Radiol 56:130–142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Jung NY, Jee WH, Ha KY, Park CK, Byun JY (2004) Discrimination of tuberculous spondylitis from pyogenic spondylitis on MRI. AJR 182:1405–1410

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lin WY, Wang SJ, Cheng KY, Shen YY, Changlai SP (1998) Diagnostic value of bone and Ga-67 imaging in skeletal tuberculosis. Clin Nucl Med 23(11):743–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gemmel F, Rijk PC, Collins JMP, Parlevliet T, Stumpe KD, Palestro CJ (2010) Expanding role of 18F-fluoro-D-deoxyglucose PET and PET/CT in spinal infections. Eur Spine J 19:540–541

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pandit HG, Sonsale PD, Shikare SS, Bhojraj SY (1999) Bone scintigraphy in tuberculous spndylodiscitis. Eur Spine J 8(3):205–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Palestro CJ, Kim CK, Swyer AJ, Vallabhajosula S, Goldsmith SJ (1991) Radionuclide diagnosis of vertebral osteomyelitis: indium 111-leukocyte and technetium-99 m-methylene diphosphonate bone scintigraphy. J Nucl Med 32:1861–1865

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim SJ, Kim IJ, Suh KT, Kim YK, Lee JS (2009) Prediction of residual disease of spine infection using F-18 FDG PET/CT. Spine 34:2424–2430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gratz S, Dörner J, Oestmann JW, Opitz M, Behr T, Meller J, Grabbe E, Becker W (2000) 67-Ga citrate and 99Tc-MDP for estimating the severity of vertebral osteomyelitis. Nucl Med Commun 21:111–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Lisbona R, Derbekyan V, Novales-Diaz J, Veksler A (1993) Gallium 67 scintigraphy in tuberculous and non-tuberculous infectious spondylitis. J Nucl Med 34(5):853–859

    Google Scholar 

  38. Schmitz A, Kälicke T, Willkomm P, Grünwald F, Kandyba JJ, Schmitt O (2000) Use of fluorine-18 fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography in assessing de process of tuberculous spondylitis. J Spinal Disord 13(6):541–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gratz S, Dorner J, Fischer U, Behr TM, Behe M, Altenvoerde G, Meller J, Grabbe E, Becker W (2002) F-18-FDG hybrid PET in patients with suspected spondylitis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 29:516–524

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Michel SC, Pfirrmann CWA, Boos N, Hodler J (2006) CT-guided core biopsy of subchondral bone and intervertebral space in suspected spondilodiskitis. AJR 186:977–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dupuy DE, Rosenberg AE, Punyaratabandhu T, Hong Tan M, Mankin H (1998) Accuracy of CT-guided needle biopsy of musculoskeletal neoplasms. AJR 171:759–762

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Anwar Hau M, Kim JI, Kattapuram S, Hornicek FJ, Rosenberg AE, Gebhardt MC, Mankin HJ (2002) Skeletal Radiol 31:349–353

    Google Scholar 

  43. Peh WCG (2006) CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of spinal lesions. Biomed Imaging Interv J 2(3):e25

    Google Scholar 

  44. Springfield DS, Rosenberg A (1996) Biopsy: complicated and risky. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:639–643

    Google Scholar 

  45. Bellaïche L, Hamze B, Parlier-Cau C, Laredo JD (1997) Percutaneous biopsy of musculoskeletal lesions. Semin Musculoskeletal Radiol 1:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Heare TC, Enneking WF, Heare MJ (1989) Staging techniques and biopsy of bone tumors. Orthop Clin North Am 20:273–285

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Fraser-Hill MA, Renfrew DL, Hilsenrath PE (1992) Percutaneous needle biopsy of musculoskeleta lesions. 2. Cost-effectiveness. AJR 158:813–817

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Skrzynsky MC, Biermann JS, Montag A, Simon MA (1996) Diagnostic accuracy and charge-savings of outpatient core needle biopsy compared with open biopsy of musculoskeletal tumors. J Bone Joint Surg 78A:644–649

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jelinek JS, Murphey MD, Welker JA, Hensaw RM, Kransdorf MJ, Shmookler BM, Malawer MM (2002) Diagnosis of primary bone tumors with image-guided percutaneous biopsy: experience with 110 tumors. Radiology 223:731–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ward WG, Kilpatrick S (2000) Fine needle aspiration biopsy of primary bone tumors. Clin Orthop 373:60–87

    Google Scholar 

  51. Nigam V, Chhabra HS (2007) Easy drainage of presacral abscess. Eur Spine J 16:S322–S325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Rivas-Garcia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rivas-Garcia, A., Sarria-Estrada, S., Torrents-Odin, C. et al. Imaging findings of Pott’s disease. Eur Spine J 22 (Suppl 4), 567–578 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2333-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2333-9

Keywords

Navigation