Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative assessment of column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common spinal cord disorder in the elderly. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been shown to be of great value for evaluating the microstructure of nerve tracts in the spinal cord. Currently, the quantitative assessment of the degeneration on the specific tracts in CSM is still rare. The aim of the present study was to use tractography-based quantification to investigate the column-specific degeneration in CSM.

Methods

A total of 43 volunteers were recruited with written informed consent, including 20 healthy subjects and 23 CSM patients. Diffusion MRI was taken by 3T MRI scanner. Fiber tractography was performed using TrackVis to reconstruct the white matter tracts of the anterior, lateral and posterior column on the bilateral sides. The DTI metrics acquired from tractography, including fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD) and radial diffusivity (RD), were compared between healthy subjects and CSM patients.

Results

Compared to healthy subjects, FA was found significantly lower in the lateral (Healthy 0.64 ± 0.07 vs. CSM 0.53 ± 0.08) and posterior column (Healthy 0.67 ± 0.08 vs. CSM 0.47 ± 0.08) (p < 0.001), while MD, AD and RD were significantly higher in the anterior, lateral and posterior column in CSM (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Loss of microstructural integrity was detected in the lateral and posterior column in CSM. Tractography-based quantification was capable of evaluating the subtle pathological insult within white matter on a column-specific basis, which exhibited potential clinical value for in vivo evaluation of the severity of CSM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ichihara K, Taguchi T, Sakuramoto I, Kawano S, Kawai S (2003) Mechanism of the spinal cord injury and the cervical spondylotic myelopathy: new approach based on the mechanical features of the spinal cord white and gray matter. J Neurosurg 99:278–285

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rao R (2003) Neck pain, cervical radiculopathy, and cervical myelopathy: pathophysiology, natural history, and clinical evaluation. Instr Course Lect 52:479–488

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baron EM, Young WF (2007) Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a brief review of its pathophysiology, clinical course, and diagnosis. Neurosurgery 60:S35–S41. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000215383.64386.82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stroman PW, Wheeler-Kingshott C, Bacon M, Schwab JM, Bosma R, Brooks J, Cadotte D, Carlstedt T, Ciccarelli O, Cohen-Adad J, Curt A, Evangelou N, Fehlings MG, Filippi M, Kelley BJ, Kollias S, Mackay A, Porro CA, Smith S, Strittmatter SM, Summers P, Tracey I (2014) The current state-of-the-art of spinal cord imaging: methods. NeuroImage 84:1070–1081. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.124

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mukherjee P, Berman JI, Chung SW, Hess CP, Henry RG (2008) Diffusion tensor MR imaging and fiber tractography: theoretic underpinnings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 29:632–641. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A1051

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Song T, Chen WJ, Yang B, Zhao HP, Huang JW, Cai MJ, Dong TF, Li TS (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging in the cervical spinal cord. Eur Spine J 20:422–428. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1587-3

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui JL, Wen CY, Hu Y, Li TH, Luk KD (2011) Entropy-based analysis for diffusion anisotropy mapping of healthy and myelopathic spinal cord. NeuroImage 54:2125–2131. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Xiangshui M, Xiangjun C, Xiaoming Z, Qingshi Z, Yi C, Chuanqiang Q, Xiangxing M, Chuanfu L, Jinwen H (2010) 3 T magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging and fibre tracking in cervical myelopathy. Clin Radiol 65:465–473. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.01.019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Uda T, Takami T, Tsuyuguchi N, Sakamoto S, Yamagata T, Ikeda H, Nagata T, Ohata K (2013) Assessment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy using diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging parameter at 3.0 tesla. Spine 38:407–414. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e31826f25a3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wen CY, Cui JL, Liu HS, Mak KC, Cheung WY, Luk KD, Hu Y (2013) Is diffusion anisotropy a biomarker for disease severity and surgical prognosis of cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Radiology. doi:10.1148/radiol.13121885

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jones JG, Cen SY, Lebel RM, Hsieh PC, Law M (2013) Diffusion tensor imaging correlates with the clinical assessment of disease severity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy and predicts outcome following surgery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 34:471–478. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3199

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Cui JL, Wen CY, Hu Y, Mak KC, Mak KH, Luk KD (2011) Orientation entropy analysis of diffusion tensor in healthy and myelopathic spinal cord. NeuroImage 58:1028–1033. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wen CY, Cui JL, Lee MP, Mak KC, Luk KD, Hu Y (2013) Quantitative analysis of fiber tractography in cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine J 13:697–705. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.061

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yonenobu K, Abumi K, Nagata K, Taketomi E, Ueyama K (2001) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the japanese orthopaedic association scoring system for evaluation of cervical compression myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26:1890–1894 (discussion 1895)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ono K, Ebara S, Fuji T, Yonenobu K, Fujiwara K, Yamashita K (1987) Myelopathy hand. New clinical signs of cervical cord damage. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69:215–219

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Summers P, Staempfli P, Jaermann T, Kwiecinski S, Kollias S (2006) A preliminary study of the effects of trigger timing on diffusion tensor imaging of the human spinal cord. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:1952–1961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gasparotti R, Lodoli G, Meoded A, Carletti F, Garozzo D, Ferraresi S (2013) Feasibility of diffusion tensor tractography of brachial plexus injuries at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol 48:104–112. doi:10.1097/RLI.0b013e3182775267

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Moldrich RX, Pannek K, Hoch R, Rubenstein JL, Kurniawan ND, Richards LJ (2010) Comparative mouse brain tractography of diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. NeuroImage 51:1027–1036. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.03.035

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thurnher MM, Law M (2009) Diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion-tensor imaging, and fiber tractography of the spinal cord. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:225–244. doi:10.1016/j.mric.2009.02.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lindberg PG, Feydy A, Maier MA (2010) White matter organization in cervical spinal cord relates differently to age and control of grip force in healthy subjects. J Neurosci 30:4102–4109. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5529-09.2010

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JW, Kim JH, Park JB, Park KW, Yeom JS, Lee GY, Kang HS (2011) Diffusion tensor imaging and fiber tractography in cervical compressive myelopathy: preliminary results. Skeletal Radiol 40:1543–1551. doi:10.1007/s00256-011-1161-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogino H, Tada K, Okada K, Yonenobu K, Yamamoto T, Ono K, Namiki H (1983) Canal diameter, anteroposterior compression ratio, and spondylotic myelopathy of the cervical spine. Spine 8:1–15

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fehlings MG, Skaf G (1998) A review of the pathophysiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy with insights for potential novel mechanisms drawn from traumatic spinal cord injury. Spine 23:2730–2737

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the support from the General Research Fund from The University Grant Council of Hong Kong (771608M/774211M). The authors would like to thank Dr. Henry Mak for his assistant in MRI scanning.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Hu.

Additional information

J.-L. Cui and X. Li contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cui, JL., Li, X., Chan, TY. et al. Quantitative assessment of column-specific degeneration in cervical spondylotic myelopathy based on diffusion tensor tractography. Eur Spine J 24, 41–47 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3522-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-014-3522-5

Keywords

Navigation