Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem—a retrospective study comparing the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The objective of this retrospective study was to study the outcome in patients with basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem (central/deep) arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated with gamma knife radiosurgery (GKS) and to compare the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations.

Methods and results

The results of 53 patients with central AVMs and 255 patients with AVMs at other locations treated with GKS at our center between April 1997 and March 2005 with minimum follow-up of 1 year were analyzed.

Central AVMs

Forty of these 53 AVMs were Spetzler-Martin grade III, 11 were grade IV, and 2 were grade V. The mean AVM volume was 4.3 cm3 (range 0.1–36.6 cm3). The mean marginal dose given was 23.3 Gy (range 16–25 Gy). The mean follow-up was 28 months (range 12–96 months). Check angiograms were advised at 2 years after GKS and yearly thereafter in the presence of residual AVM till 4 years. Presence of a residual AVM on an angiogram at 4 years after radiosurgery was considered as radiosurgical failure. Complete obliteration of the AVM was documented in 14 (74%) of the 19 patients with complete angiographic follow-up. Significantly lower obliteration rates (37% vs. 100%) were seen in larger AVMs (>3 cm3) and AVMs of higher (IV and V) Spetzler-Martin grades (28% vs. 100%). The 3- and 4-year actuarial rates of nidus obliteration were 68% and 74%, respectively. Eight patients (15%) developed radiation edema with a statistically significantly higher incidence in patients with AVM volume >3 cm3 and in patients with Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V AVMs. Five patients (9.4%) had hemorrhage in the period of latency.

Comparison of results with AVMs at other locations

Patients with central AVMs presented at a younger age (mean age 22.7 years vs. 29 years), with a very high proportion (81% vs. 63%) presenting with hemorrhage. Significantly higher incidence of radiation edema (15% vs. 5%) and lower obliteration rates (74% vs. 93%) were seen in patients with central AVMs.

Conclusions

GKS is an effective modality of treatment for central AVMs, though relatively lower obliteration rates and higher complication rates are seen compared to AVMs at other locations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andrade-Souza YM, Zadeh G, Scora D, Tsao MN, Schwartz ML (2005) Radiosurgery for basal ganglia, internal capsule and thalamus arteriovenous malformation: clinical outcome. Neurosurgery 56:56–62. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000156547.24603.EE

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. ApSimon HT (2002) Reef H, Phadke RV, Popovic EA: a population-based study of brain arteriovenous malformation: long-term treatment outcomes. Stroke 33:2794–2800. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000043674.99741.9B

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Batjer H, Suss RA, Samson D (1986) Intra cranial arteriovenous malformations associated with aneurysms. Neurosurgery 18:29–35

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown RD Jr, Wiebers DO, Forbes G, O’Fallon WM, Piepgras DG, Marsh WR, Maciunas RJ (1988) The natural history of unruptured intracranial arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 68:352–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown RD Jr, Wiebers DO, Torner JC, O’Fallon WM (1996) Frequency of intracranial hemorrhage as a presenting symptom and subtype analysis: a population-based study of intracranial vascular malformations in Omlsted country, Minnesota. J Neurosurg 85:29–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombo F, Pozza F, Chierego G, Casentini L, De Luca G, Francescon P (1991) Linear accelerator radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an update. Neurosurgery 34:14–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Crawford PM, West CR, Chadwick DW, Shaw MD (1986) Arteriovenous malformations of the brain: natural history in unoperated patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 49:1–10. doi:10.1136/jnnp. 49.1.1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crocco A (2002) Arteriovenous malformations in the basal ganglia region: gamma knife radiosurgery as first choice treatment in selected cases. J Neurosurg Sci 46:43–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Oliveira E, Tedeschi H, Siqueira MG, Ono M, Rhoton AL Jr (1997) Arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia region: rationale for surgical management. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 139:487–506. doi:10.1007/BF02750990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drake CG (1979) Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: considerations for and experience with surgical treatment in 166 cases. Clin Neurosurg 26:145–208

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Graf CJ, Perret GE, Torner JC (1983) Bleeding from cerebral arteriovenous malformations as part of their natural history. J Neurosurg 58:331–337

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fleetwood IG, Maecellus ML, Levy RP, Marks MP, Steinberg GK (2003) Deep arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia and thalamus: natural history. J Neurosurg 98:747–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Flickinger JC, Kondziolka D, Lunsford LD, Kassam A, Phuong LK, Liscak R, Pollock B (2000) Development of a model to predict permanent symptomatic postradiosurgery injury for arteriovenous malformation patients. Arteriovenous Malformation Radiosurgery Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 46:1143–1148. doi:10.1016/S0360-3016(99)00513-1

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Friedman WA, Pollock BE, Mendenhall WM (1995) Linear accelerator radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations: the relationship of size to outcome. J Neurosurg 82:180–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hartmann A, Mast H, Mohr JP, Koennecke HC, Osipov A, Pile-Spellman J, Duong DH, Young WL (1998) Morbidity of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Stroke 29:931–934

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hurst RW, Berenstein A, Kupersmith MJ, Madrid M, Flamm ES (1995) Deep central arteriovenous malformations of the brain: the role of endovascular treatment. J Neurosurg 82:190–195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Karlsson B, Lax I, Soderman M, Khirlstrom L, Lindquist C (1995) Prediction of results following gamma knife surgery for brain stem and other centrally located arteriovenpus malformations: Relation to natural course. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 66(suppl 1):260–268. doi:10.1159/000099817

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kjellberg RN, Hanumara T, Davis KR, Lyons SL, Adams RD (1983) Bragg-peak proton beam therapy for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. N Engl J Med 309:269–274

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, Kida Y, Oyama H, Niwa M, Maesawa S (1996) Gamma knife treatment of AVM of basal ganglia and thalamus. No To Shinkei 48:351–356 Article in Japanese

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurita H, Kawamoto S, Sasaki T, Shin M, Tago M, Terahara A, Ueki K, Kirino T (2000) Results of radiosurgery for brainstem arteriovenous malformations. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68:563–570. doi:10.1136/jnnp. 68.5.563

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lawton MT, Hamilton MG, Spetzler RF (1995) Multimodality treatment of deep arteriovenous malformations: thalamus, basal ganglia and brain stem. Neurosurgery 37:29–35. doi:10.1097/00006123-199507000-00004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Levy EI, Niranjan A, Thompson TP, Scarrow AM, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC (2000) Radiosurgery for childhood intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurg 47:834–841. doi:10.1097/00006123-200010000-00008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lunsford LD, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Bissonette DJ, Jungreis CA, Maitz AH, Horton JA, Coffey RJ (1991) Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. J Neurosurg 75:512–524

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Malik GM, Umansky F, Patel S, Ausman JL (1988) Microsurgical removal of arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia. Neurosurgery 23:209–217. doi:10.1097/00006123-198808000-00014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maruyama K, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD (2004) Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain stem arteriovenous malformations: factors affecting outcome. J Neurosurg 100:407–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Massager N, Régis J, Kondziolka D, Njee T, Levivier M (2000) Gamma knife radiosurgery for brainstem arteriovenous malformations: preliminary results. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):102–103

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Miyasaka Y, Yada K, Ohwada T, Kitahara T, Kurata A, Inkura K (1992) An analysis of venous drainage system as a factor in hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 76:239–243

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Morgan MK, Drummond KJ, Grinnel V, Sorby W (1977) Surgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: risks related to lenticulostriate arterial supply. J Neurosurg 86:801–805

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nicolato A, Foroni R, Crocco A, Zampieri PG, Alessandrini F, Bricolo A, Geerosa MA (2002) Gamma knife radiosurgery in the management of arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia region of the brain. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:211–223. doi:10.1055/s-2002-36200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ondra S, Troupp H, George E (1990) The natural history of symptomatic arteriovenous malformations of the brain: a 24 year follow-up assessment. J Neurosurg 73:387–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pan DH, Guo WY, Chun WY, Shiau CY, Chang YC, Wang LW (2000) Gammaknife radiosurgery as a single treatment modality for large cerebral arteriovenous malformation. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl 3):113–119

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Paulsen RD, Steinberg GK, Norbash AM, Marcellus ML, Marks MP (1999) Embolization of basal ganglia and thalamic arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 44:991–996. doi:10.1097/00006123-199905000-00031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Perret G, Nishoika H (1966) Report on the cooperative study of the intracranial aneurysms and subarachnoid hemorrhage:section IV-arteriovenous malformations: an analysis of 545 cases of craniocerebral arteriovenous malformations and fistulae reported to the cooperative study. J Neurosurg 25:467–490

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pollock BE, Gorman DA, Brown PD (2004) Radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the basal ganglia, thalamus and brain stem. J Neurosurg 100:210–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Sasaki T, Kurita H, Saito I, Kawamoto S, Nemoto S, Terahara A, Kirino T, Takakura K (1998) Arteriovenous malformations in the basal ganglia and thalamus: management and results in 101 cases. J Neurosurg 88:285–292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Shin M, Kawamoto S, Kurita H, Tago M, Sasaki T, Morita A, Ueki K, Kirino T (2002) Retrospective analysis of a 10-year experience of stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations in children and adolescents. J Neurosurg 97:779–784

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smyth MD, Sneed PK, Ciricillo SF, Edwards MS, Wara WM, Larson DA, Lawton MT, Gutin PH, McDermott MW (2002) Stereotactic radiosurgery for pediatric intracranial arteriovenous malformations: the University of California at San Francisco experience. J Neurosurg 97:48–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Spetzler RF, Hargraves RW, Mc Cormick PW, Zabranski JM, Flom RA, Zimmerman RS (1992) Relationship of perfusion pressure and size to the risk of hemorrhage from arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 76:918–923

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Steinberg GK, Fabrikant JI, Marks MP, Levy RP, Frankel KA, Phillips MH, Shuer LM, Silverberg GD (1990) Stereotactic heavy charged-particle bragg-peak radiation for intracranial arteriovenous malformations. N Engl J Med 323:96–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tew JM Jr, Lewis AI, Reichert KW (1995) Management strategies and surgical techniques for deep seated arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery 36:1065–1072

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Waga S, Shimosaka S, Kojima T (1985) Arteriovenous malformations of the lateral ventricle. J Neurosurg 63:185–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Yamamoto Y, Coffey TJ, Nichols DA, Shaw EG (1995) Interim report on the radiosurgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. The influence of size, dose, time and functional factors on obliteration rate. J Neurosurg 83:832–837

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to our beloved teachers Dr. P.N. Tandon and Dr. A.K. Banerjee for their valuable suggestions. Our thanks to biophysists Emanuel and Gopi Shankar and statistician Kulwant Singh Kapoor for their help.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shashank Sharad Kale.

Additional information

Comment

The authors present a retrospective review of the results of gamma knife treatment of deep (brainstem, thalamic and basal ganglia) AVMs. Fifty-three cases with more than 1-year follow-up were compared with the rest of their cohort, 255 patients with AVMs in less eloquent positions. They showed that these malformations have a lower occlusion rate and higher side effect rate as well as a higher risk of bleeding during the latency period than their less eloquent counterparts.

Rather than focusing on the negative, one has to acknowledge that 74% cure at the “cost” of 15% side effects, only half of which is lasting, is actually a good deal for these patients: the literature demonstrates a higher risk rate with microsurgery in most hands.

There is no explanation why the deep AVMs have a lower occlusion rate than the rest. This may well be a genuine difference in radiosensitivity, but there is an alternative explanation. Despite using the same prescription dose value, the dose may be prescribed to a “tighter” plan in an eloquent area, in effect leaving some parts “undertreated.”

It is also interesting to note the higher risk of hemorrhage in this subgroup. The different angio-architecture and the presence of intranidal aneurysms and venous varices are usually implicated. Analyzing a larger cohort may be correctable for this factor.

Andras A Kemeny

Sheffield, UK

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiran, N.A.S., Kale, S.S., Kasliwal, M.K. et al. Gamma knife radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of basal ganglia, thalamus and brainstem—a retrospective study comparing the results with that for AVMs at other intracranial locations. Acta Neurochir 151, 1575–1582 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0335-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0335-0

Keywords

Navigation