Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Flow diverters are recently developed stent-like endovascular devices developed to treat complex and non-coilable aneurysms. SILK is a type of flow diverter that has been used for nearly 3 years. Only sparse data about it are available. We would like to share our experience with this device.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients were treated with SILK from October 2008 to October 2010. Thirty-one treatment sessions were performed for 32 aneurysms using 31 SILKs. Twenty have been treated with SILK only and eight with SILK and adjuvant stents. Twenty-six (86%) patients performed cross-sectional imaging (MRA/CTA) for follow-up. Eighteen (64%) patients had follow-up brain angiography.

Results

In all patients the SILK could be deployed. No case of early or late aneurysmal rupture was noted. Five patients (17.8%) developed immediate clinical complications, which were permanent in three (10.7%). All the complications occurred in patients harboring aneurysms larger than 15 mm. In two other patients, occlusion of the SILK was noted with no clinical deficit. A complete or near-complete aneurysmal occlusion was found in brain angiography or cross-sectional imaging follow-up in 83.3% of the patients.

Conclusions

SILK is a relatively simple device to use, with a low rate of technical and clinical complications and a high short-term aneurysmal occlusion rate. In aneurysms smaller than 15 mm, the results are excellent. Results are also encouraging in the larger aneurysms, taking into consideration their complexity. The device characteristics and mainly its drawbacks must be well known by the users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrne JV, Beltechi R, Yarnold JA, Birks J, Kamran M (2010) Early experience in the treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms by endovascular flow diversion: a multicentre prospective study. PLos One 5(9) pii:e12492

  2. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, Summers PE, Kerr RS, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Rischmiller J, Byrne JV (2007) Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 38:1538–1544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fiorella D, Woo HH, Albuquerque FC, Nelson PK (2008) Definitive reconstruction of circumferential, fusiform intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device. Neurosurgery 62:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Friedman JA, Nichols DA, Meyer FB, Pichelmann MA, McIver JI, Toussaint LG 3rd, Axley PL, Brown RD Jr (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil treatment of ruptured saccular cerebral aneurysms: retrospective review of a 10-year single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:526–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayashi K, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M, Horie N, Kawakubo J, Hiu T, Tsutsumi K, Nagata I (2009) Long-term follow-up of endovascular coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms using three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography. Neurol Res 31(7):674–680

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Higashida RT, Smith W, Gress D, Urwin R, Dowd CF, Balousek PA, Halbach VV (1997) Intravascular stent and endovascular coil placement for a ruptured fusiform aneurysm of the basilar artery. Case review and of the literature. J Neurosurg 87:944–949

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Horie N, Kitagawa N, Morikawa M, Tsutsumi K, Kaminogo M, Nagata I (2007) Progressive perianeurysmal edema induced after endovascular coil embolization. Report of three cases and review of the literature. J Neurosurg 106(5):916–920

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ionita CN, Paciorek AM, Dohatcu A, Hoffmann KR, Bednarek DR, Kolega J, Levy EI, Hopkins LN, Rudin S, Mocco JD (2009) The asymmetric vascular stent: efficacy in a rabbit aneurysm model. Stroke 40:959–965

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lubicz B, Collignon L, Raphaeli G, Pruvo JP, Bruneau M, De Witte O, Leclerc X (2010) Flow-diverter stent for the endovascular treatment ofintracranial aneurysms: a prospective study in 29 patients with 34 aneurysms. Stroke 41(10):2247–2253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lylyk P, Miranda C, Ceratto R, Ferrario A, Scrivano E, Luna HR, Berez AL, Tran Q, Nelson PK, Fiorella D (2009) Curative endovascular reconstruction of cerebral aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: the Buenos Aires experience. Neurosurgery 64:632–642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, Sandercock P, Clarke M, Shrimpton J, Holman R (2002) International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomized trial. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 11:304–314

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Murayama Y, Nien YL, Duckwiler G, Gobin YP, Jahan R, Frazee J, Martin N, Viñuela F (2003) Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years’ experience. J Neurosurg 98:959–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, Grzyska U, Zeumer H, Fiehler J (2007) Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 28:1755–1761

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sadasivan C, Cesar L, Seong J, Rakian A, Hao Q, Tio FO, Wakhloo AK, Lieber BB (2009) An original flow diversion device for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: evaluation in the rabbit elastase-induced model. Stroke 40:952–958

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Szikora I, Berentei Z, Kulcsar Z, Marosfoi M, Vajda ZS, Lee W, Berez A, Nelson PK (2010) Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by functional reconstruction of the parent artery: the Budapest experience with the Pipeline embolization device. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(6):1139–1147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thornton J, Debrun GM, Aletich VA, Bashir Q, Charbel FT, Ausman J (2002) Follow up angiography of intracranial aneurysms treated with endovascular placement of Guglielmi detachable coils. Neurosurgery 50:239–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Turowski B, Macht S, Kulcsár Z, Hänggi D, Stummer W (2011) Early fatal hemorrhage after endovascular cerebral aneurysm treatment with a flow diverter (SILK-Stent): do we need to rethink our concepts? Neuroradiology 53(1):37–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vallee JN, Aymard A, Vicaut E, Reis M, Merland JJ (2003) Endovascular treatment of basilar tip aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils: predictors of immediate and long-term results with multivariate analysis 6-year experience. Radiology 226:867–879

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shimon Maimon.

Additional information

S. Maimon and L. Gonen contributed equally to this paper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maimon, S., Gonen, L., Nossek, E. et al. Treatment of intra-cranial aneurysms with the SILK flow diverter: 2 years’ experience with 28 patients at a single center. Acta Neurochir 154, 979–987 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-012-1316-2

Keywords

Navigation