Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of CT perfusion with 64-row multi-detector CT for acute ischemic brain stroke

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigated the utility of computed tomographic (CT) perfusion (CTP) with 64-row multi-detector row CT (MDCT) to diagnose acute infarction and ischemic penumbra. We reviewed 58 clinical cases with acute ischemic stroke with CTP, compared the size of the area with long mean transit time (MTT) to that with abnormal intensity in magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to diagnose penumbra, and compared the size of the area with reduced cerebral blood volume (CBV) in CTP to that in MR DWI to evaluate sensitivity for infarction. The total sensitivity of MTT to acute ischemic lesions was 81% (47/58). Sensitivity of MTT to segmental lesions was 100% (42/42) and for spot and focal lesions, 31% (5/16). In 13 patients, penumbra was diagnosed as lesions mismatched between MTT in CTP and MR DWI. When we regarded a lesion with decreased CBV as infarction, the sensitivity of CBV to segmental lesions was 85% (11/13), and the sensitivity to small infarction was 14% (4/28). Use of 64-row MDCT improves coverage and radiation exposure in head CTP. The combination of plain CT, CT angiography, and CTP with MDCT can demonstrate all segmental ischemic lesions and most large segmental infarctions, and their combined application is useful in considering indication and contraindication for thrombolysis. The problem of low sensitivity for small lesions remains, and MR DWI may be required to assess small infarctions when findings from combined plain CT, CT angiography, and CTP are negative in patients with suspected acute brain stroke.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Mohr A, Ringleb PA, Jansen O, Hacke W (2001) Thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke–a review. Part I—Intravenous thrombolysis. Crit Care Med 29:1812–1818

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roberts HC, Roberts TP, Smith WS, Lee TJ, Fischbein NJ, Dillon WP (2001) Multisection dynamic CT perfusion for acute cerebral ischemia: the “toggling-table” technique. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 22:1077–1080

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wintermark M, Reichhart M, Thiran JP, Maeder P, Chalaron M, Schnyder P, Bogousslavsky J, Meuli R (2002) Prognostic accuracy of cerebral blood flow measurement by perfusion computed tomography, at the time of emergency room admission, in acute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 51:417–432

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, Becker CR, Gückel F, Lorenz WJ (1994) Quantification of regional cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 193:637–641

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kikuchi K, Murase K, Miki H, Yasuhara Y, Sugawara Y, Mochizuki T, Ikezoe J, Ohue S (2002) Quantitative evaluation of mean transit times obtained with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging and with (133)Xe SPECT in occlusive cerebrovascular disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 179:229–235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanal E, Barkovich AJ, Bell C, Borgstede JP, Bradley WG Jr, Froelich JW, Gilk T et al (2007) ACR guidance document for safe MR practices: 2007. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:1447–1474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang YF, Tsirka SE, Strickland S, Stieg PE, Soriano SG, Lipton SA (1995) Tissue plasminogen activator for acute ischemic stroke. The National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke rt-PA Stroke Study Group. N Engl J Med 333:1581–1587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lev MH, Segal AZ, Farkas J, Hossain ST, Putman C, Hunter GJ, Budzik R et al (2001) Utility of perfusion-weighted CT imaging in acute middle cerebral artery stroke treated with intra-arterial thrombolysis: prediction of final infarct volume and clinical outcome. Stroke 32:2021–2028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schellinger PD, Fiebach JB, Hacke W (2003) Imaging-based decision making in thrombolytic therapy for ischemic stroke: present status. Stroke 34:575–583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Eastwood JD, Lev MH, Azhari T, Lee TY, Barboriak DP, Delong DM, Fitzek C et al (2002) CT perfusion scanning with deconvolution analysis: pilot study in patients with acute middle cerebral artery stroke. Radiology 222:227–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wintermark M, Fischbein NJ, Smith WS, Ko NU, Quist M, Dillon WP (2005) Accuracy of dynamic perfusion CT with deconvolution in detecting acute hemispheric stroke. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:104–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Astrup J, Siesjö BK, Symon L (1981) Thresholds in cerebral ischemia—the ischemic penumbra. Stroke 12:723–725

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Soares BP, Dankbaar JW, Bredno J, Cheng S, Bhogal S, Dillon WP, Wintermark M (2009) Automated versus manual post-processing of perfusion-CT data in patients with acute cerebral ischemia: influence on interobserver variability. Neuroradiol 51:445–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nabavi DG, Cenic A, Craen RA, Gelb AW, Bennett JD, Kozak R, Lee TY (1999) CT assessment of cerebral perfusion: experimental validation and initial clinical experience. Radiology 213:141–149

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Heiss WD, Grond M, Thiel A, von Stockhausen HM, Rudolf J (1997) Ischaemic brain tissue salvaged from infarction with alteplase. Lancet 349:1599–1600

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, Meuli R, van Leeuwen M, Goldsher D, Pineda C et al (2006) Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 37:979–985

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoeffner EG, Case I, Jain R, Gujar SK, Shah GV, Deveikis JP, Carlos RC et al (2004) Cerebral perfusion CT: technique and clinical applications. Radiology 231:632–644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmülling S, Grond M, Rudolf J, Heiss WD (2000) One-year follow-up in acute stroke patients treated with rtPA in clinical routine. Stroke 31:1552–1554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cocho D, Belví R, Martí-Fàbregas J, Bravo Y, Aleu A, Pagonabarraga J, Molina-Porcel L et al (2006) Does thrombolysis benefit patients with lacunar syndrome? Eur Neurol 55:70–73

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Suzuki K, Morita S, Masukawa A, Machida H, Ueno E (2010) Diagnosing a large slowly enhanced cerebral aneurysm using 4-dimensional multiphase dynamic contrast-enhanced CT angiography. Jpn J Radiol (in press)

  21. Hirata M, Sugawara Y, Fukutomi Y, Oomoto K, Murase K, Miki H et al (2005) Measurement of radiation dose in cerebral CT perfusion study. Radiat Med Mar 23(2):97–103

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sasaki M, Kudo K, Oikawa H (2006) CT perfusion for acute stroke: current concepts on technical aspects and clinical applications. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest statement

We declare that we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazufumi Suzuki.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Suzuki, K., Morita, S., Masukawa, A. et al. Utility of CT perfusion with 64-row multi-detector CT for acute ischemic brain stroke. Emerg Radiol 18, 95–101 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0905-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0905-8

Keywords

Navigation