Skip to main content
Log in

The role of computed tomography (CT) in predicting diplopia in orbital blowout fractures (BOFs)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The management of orbital blowout fractures (BOFs) is controversial: the evaluation of diplopia is the most important criterion for planning whether to undertake surgery.

Our aim was to determine CT findings that may suggest the presence of diplopia when patients with BOFs cannot be adequately examined to plan an orbital repair.

Method and materials

We retrospectively evaluated CT of all patients presented to our Emergency Department for blunt craniofacial trauma (N = 3334) from January 2014 to March 2016, selecting patients with CT-demonstrated BOFs.

The following CT variables were assessed: fracture location, fracture multifocality, bone fragments displacement, extraocular muscles (EOM) thickening, EOM entrapment, EOM displacement, EOM hooking, intraconal and extraconal emphysema, intraconal and extraconal hematoma, and fat herniation.

All patients underwent Hess-Lancaster test, to establish the presence of diplopia.

After performing group comparison with Pearson χ2 test, we derived our prediction model by using logistic regression, with diplopia as the prediction and CT variables as predictors.

Results

We observed 299 patients with BOFs, 46 (15.4%) with a Hess Lancaster test-proven diplopia.

The CT variables with statistically significant difference between the group with diplopia and the group without diplopia were as follows: floor fracture (p = .014), bone fragments displacement (p = .001), multifocality (p = .005), EOM thickening (p = .001), EOM entrapment (p < .001), EOM displacement (p < .001), fat herniation (p = .003).

The CT variables with significance as predictors of diplopia at multivariate analysis were as follows: orbital floor fracture (p value 0.015; odds ratio 2.871, 95% confidence interval of odds ratio 0.223–6.738), EOM displacement (p value 0.001; odds ratio 10.693, 95% confidence interval of odds ratio 3.761–30.401), EOM entrapment (p value 0.001; odds ratio 11.510, 95% confidence interval of odds ratio 3.059–43.306).

Conclusion

The presence of diplopia can be suggested on the basis of CT findings after an orbital trauma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Joseph JM, Glavas IP (2011) Orbital fractures: a review. Clin Ophthalmol 5:95–100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Bruneau S, De Haller R, Courvoisier DS, Scolozzi P (2016) Can a specific computed tomography-based assessment predict the ophthalmological outcome in pure orbital floor blowout fractures? J Craniofac Surg 27(8):2092–2097

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bartoli D, Fadda MT, Battisti A, Cassoni A, Pagnoni M, Riccardi E, Sanzi M, Valentini V (2015) Retrospective analysis of 301 patients with orbital floor fracture. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:244–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Furuta M, Yago K, Iida T (2006) Correlation between ocular motility and evaluation of computed tomography in orbital blowout fracture. Am J Ophthalmol 142(6):1019–1025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Egbert JE, May K, Kersten RC, Kulwin DR (2000) Pediatric orbital floor fracture: direct extraocular EOM involvement. Ophthalmology 107:1875–1879

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jordan DR, Allen LH, White J, Harvey J, Pashby R, Esmaeli B (1998) Intervention within days for some orbital floor fractures: the white-eyed blowout. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 14:379–390

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Burnstine MA (2003) Clinical recommendations for repair of orbital facial fractures. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 14:236–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hawes MJ, Dortzbach RK (1983) Surgery on orbital floor fractures. Influence of time of repair and fracture size. Ophthalmology 90:1066–1070

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jung H, Byun JY, Kim HJ, Min JH, Park GM, Kim HY, Kim YK, Cha J, Kim STJ (2016) Prognostic CT findings of diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture. Craniomaxillofac Surg 44(9):1479–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yano H, Suzuki Y, Yoshimoto H, Mimasu R, Hirano A (2010) Linear-type orbital floor fracture with or without EOM involvement. J Craniofac Surg 21(4):1072–1078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koide R, Ueda T, Takano K, Tsuchiya A, Totsuka N, Inatomi M (2003) Surgical outcome of blowout fracture: early repair without implants and the usefulness of balloon treatment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 47(4):392–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hoşal BM, Beatty RL (2002) Diplopia and enophthalmos after surgical repair of blowout fracture. Orbit 21(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Biesman BS, Hornblass A, Lisman R, Kazlas M (1996) Diplopia after surgical repair of orbital floor fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 12(1):9–16 discussion 17

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Harris GJ, Garcia GH, Logani SC, Murphy ML (2000) Correlation of preoperative computed tomography and postoperative ocular motility in orbital blowout fractures. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 16(3):179–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Tahiri Y, Lee J, Tahiri M, Sinno H, Williams BH, Lessard L, Gilardino MS (2010) Preoperative diplopia: the most important prognostic factor for diplopia after surgical repair of pure orbital blowout fracture. J Craniofac Surg 21(4):1038–1041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsunaga K, Asamura S, Morotomi T, Wada M, Wada Y, Nakamura N, Isogai N (2011) Association between preoperative inferior rectus EOM swelling and outcomes in orbital blowout fracture. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 39(7):509–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jin HR, Lee HS, Yeon JY, Suh MW (2007) Residual diplopia after repair of pure orbital blowout fracture: the importance of extraocular EOM injury. Am J Rhinol 21(3):276–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grant JH 3rd, Patrinely JR, Weiss AH, Kierney PC, Gruss JS (2002) Trapdoor fracture of the orbit in a pediatric population. Plast Reconstr Surg 109(2):482–489 discussion 490-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Okinaka Y, Hara J, Takahashi M (1999) Orbital blowout fracture with persistent mobility deficit due to fibrosis of the inferior rectus EOM and perimuscular tissue. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 108(12):1174–1176

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Anda S, Elsås T, Harstad HK (1987) The missing rectus: a CT observation from blow-out fracture of the orbital floor. J Comput Assist Tomogr Sep-Oct 11(5):895–897

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Roth A, Desmangles P, Rossillion B (1999) Early treatment of secondary EOM restriction due to orbital blow-out fractures. J Fr Ophtalmol 22(6):645–650

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoşal BM, Beatty RL (2002) Diplopia and enophthalmos after surgical repair of blowout fracture. Orbit 21(1):27–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mansour TN, Rudolph M, Brown D, Mansour N, Taheri MR (2017) Orbital blowout fractures: a novel CT measurement that can predict the likelihood of surgical management. Am J Emerg Med 35(1):112–116

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gilbard SM, Mafee MF, Lagouros PA, Langer BG (1985) Orbital blowout fractures. The prognosticsignificance of computed tomography. Ophthalmology 92(11):1523–1528

  25. Shah HA, Shipchandler TZ, Sufyan AS, Nunery WR, Lee HB (2013) Use of fracture size and soft tissue herniation on computed tomography to predict diplopia in isolated orbital floor fractures. Am J Otolaryngol 34(6):695–698

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Rhee SH, Kim TS, Song JM, Shin SH, Lee JY (2014) Effectiveness of computed tomography for blow-out fracture. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 36(6):273–279

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Putterman AM (1991) Management of blow out fractures of the orbital floor. III. The conservative approach. Surv Ophthalmol 35(4):292–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michaela Cellina.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cellina, M., Floridi, C., Panzeri, M. et al. The role of computed tomography (CT) in predicting diplopia in orbital blowout fractures (BOFs). Emerg Radiol 25, 13–19 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1551-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-017-1551-1

Keywords

Navigation