Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Efficacy of a Checklist-Style Structured Radiology Reporting Template in Reducing Resident Misses on Cervical Spine Computed Tomography Examinations

  • Published:
Journal of Digital Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increasing use of medical checklists to promote patient safety raises the question of their utility in diagnostic radiology. This study evaluates the efficacy of a checklist-style reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine CT examinations. A checklist-style reporting template for cervical spine CTs was created at our institution and mandated for resident preliminary reports. Ten months after implementation of the template, we performed a retrospective cohort study comparing rates of emergent pathology missed on reports generated with and without the checklist-style reporting template. In 1,832 reports generated without using the checklist-style template, 25 (17.6 %) out of 142 emergent findings were missed. In 1,081 reports generated using the checklist-style template, 13 (11.9 %) out of 109 emergent findings were missed. The decrease in missed pathology was not statistically significant (p = 0.21). However, larger differences were noted in the detection of emergent non-fracture findings, with 17 (28.3 %) out of 60 findings missed on reports without use of the checklist template and 5 (9.3 %) out of 54 findings missed on reports using the checklist template, representing a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings (p = 0.01). The use of a checklist-style structured reporting template resulted in a statistically significant decrease in missed non-fracture findings on cervical spine CTs. The lack of statistically significant change in missed fractures was expected given that residents’ search patterns naturally include fracture detection. Our findings suggest that the use of checklists in structured reporting may increase diagnostic accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagliardi RA: The evolution of the X-ray report. AJR Am J Roentgenol 164(2):501–502, 1995

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hobby JL, Tom BD, Todd C, et al: Communication of doubt and certainty in radiological reports. Br J Radiol 73:999–1001, 2000

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Plumb AA, Grieve FM, Khan SH: Survey of hospital clinicians’ preferences regarding the format of radiology reports. Clin Radiol 64(4):386–394, 2009. 395-396

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sierra AE, Bisesi MA, Rosenbaum TL, et al: Readability of the radiologic report. Invest Radiol 27:236–239, 1992

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sobel JL, Pearson ML, Gross K, et al: Information content and clarity of radiologists’ reports for chest radiography. Acad Radiol 3:709–717, 1996

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Groom RC, Morton JR: Outcomes analysis in cardiac surgery. Perfusion 12:257–261, 1997

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tobler HG, Sethi GK, Grover FL, et al: Variations in processes and structures in cardiac surgery practice. Med Care 33(10):OS43–OS58, 1995

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Weiss DL, Langlotz CP: Structured reporting: patient care enhancement or productivity nightmare? Radiology 249(3):739–747, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Khorasani R, Bates DW, Teeger S, Rothschild JM, Adams DF, Selter SE: Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports? Acad Radiol 10(6):685–688, 2003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kong A, Barnett GO, Mosteller F, Youtz C: How medical professionals evaluate expressions of probability. N Engl J Med 315(12):740–744, 1986

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu D, Berman GD, Gray RN: The use of structured radiology reporting at a community hospital: a 4-year case study of more than 200,000 reports. Appl Radiol 32(7):23–26, 2003

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Naik SS, Handbridge A, Wilson SR: Radiology reports: examining radiologist and clinician preferences regarding style and content. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:591–598, 2001

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H: Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260(1):174–181, 2011

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, et al: An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med 355:2725–2732, 2006

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Berenholtz SM, Pham JC, Thompson DA, et al: Collaborative cohort study of an intervention to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia in the intensive care unit. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 32:305–314, 2011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hales B, Terblanche M, Fowler R, Sibbald W: Development of medical checklists for improved quality of patient care. Int J Qual Health Care 20(1):22–30, 2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hart EM, Owen H: Errors and omissions in anesthesia: a pilot study using a pilot’s checklist. Anesth Analg 101:246–250, 2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, et al: A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med 360:491–499, 2009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lingard L, Espin S, Rubin B, et al: Getting teams to talk: development and prior implementation of a checklist to promote interpersonal communication in the OR. Qual Saf Health Care 14:340–346, 2005

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Van Roozendaal BW, Krass I: Development of an evidence-based checklist for the detection of drug related problems in type 2 diabetes. Pharm World Sci 31(5):580–595, 2009

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) radiology reporting initiative. Available at http://www.radreport.org/specialty/nr. Accessed 26 November 2010

  22. Johnson AJ, Chen MY, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B: Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology 253(1):74–80, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Langlotz CP: Structured radiology reporting: are we there yet? Radiology 253(1):23–25, 2009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarney R, Warner J, Iliffe S, et al: The Hawthorne effect: a randomized, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 7:30, 2007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Christopher Moosavi, MD and Shain Wallis, MD for their work on the checklist-style structured reporting template. The authors also thank David Lucido, PhD for his assistance with the statistical analysis.

Conflicts of Interest

There are no financial disclosures or conflicts of interest to report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, St. Luke’s Roosevelt Hospital Center, 1000 10th Ave, Rm 4C-12, New York, NY, 10019, USA

    Eaton Lin & Nolan J. Kagetsu

  2. Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, First Avenue at 16th St., New York, NY, 10003, USA

    Daniel K. Powell

Authors
  1. Eaton Lin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Daniel K. Powell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nolan J. Kagetsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eaton Lin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lin, E., Powell, D.K. & Kagetsu, N.J. Efficacy of a Checklist-Style Structured Radiology Reporting Template in Reducing Resident Misses on Cervical Spine Computed Tomography Examinations. J Digit Imaging 27, 588–593 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation