Abstract
Disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics are part of the pathophysiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and can be modified and treated with shunt surgery. This study investigated the contribution of established CSF dynamic parameters to AMPmean, a prognostic variable defined as mean amplitude of cardiac-related intracranial pressure pulsations during 10 min of lumbar constant infusion, with the aim of clarifying the physiological interpretation of the variable. AMPmean and CSF dynamic parameters were determined from infusion tests performed on 18 patients with suspected NPH. Using a mathematical model of CSF dynamics, an expression for AMPmean was derived and the influence of the different parameters was assessed. There was high correlation between modelled and measured AMPmean (r = 0.98, p < 0.01). Outflow resistance and three parameters relating to compliance were identified from the model. Correlation analysis of patient data confirmed the effect of the parameters on AMPmean (Spearman’s ρ = 0.58–0.88, p < 0.05). Simulated variations of ±1 standard deviation (SD) of the parameters resulted in AMPmean changes of 0.6–2.9 SD, with the elastance coefficient showing the strongest influence. Parameters relating to compliance showed the largest contribution to AMPmean, which supports the importance of the compliance aspect of CSF dynamics for the understanding of the pathophysiology of NPH.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andersson K, Sundström N, Malm J, Eklund A (2011) Effect of resting pressure on the estimate of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance. Fluids Barriers CNS 8(1):15
Andersson K, Manchester IR, Laurell K, Cesarini K, Malm J, Eklund A (2013) Measurement of CSF dynamics with oscillating pressure infusion. Acta Neurol Scand 128(1):17–23
Andersson N, Malm J, Bäcklund T, Eklund A (2005) Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using constant-pressure infusion–a method with real time estimation of reliability. Physiol Meas 26:1137–1148
Andersson N, Malm J, Eklund A (2008) Dependency of cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance on intracranial pressure. J Neurosurg 109:918–922
Anile C, De Bonis P, Albanese A, Di Chirico A, Mangiola A, Petrella G, Santini P (2010) Selection of patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus for shunt placement: a single-institution experience. J Neurosurg 113(1):64–73
Avezaat CJJ, Van Eijndhoven JHM, Wyper DJ (1979) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial volume-pressure relationships. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 42(8):687–700
Avezaat CJJ, Van Eijndhoven JHM (1986) Clinical observations on the relationship between cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure and intracranial pressure. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 79:13–29
Baledent O, Fin L, Khuoy L, Ambarki K, Gauvin AC, Gondry-Jouet C, Meyer ME (2006) Brain hydrodynamics study by phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and transcranial color doppler. J Magn Reson Imaging 24(5):995–1004
Bateman GA (2002) Pulse-wave encephalopathy: a comparative study of the hydrodynamics of leukoaraiosis and normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neuroradiology 44:740–748
Bradley WG, Scalzo D, Queralt J, Nitz WN, Atkinson DJ, Wong P (1996) Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at mr imaging. Neuroradiology 198:523–529
Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Momjian S, Pickard JD (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics. Physiol Meas 25:R51–R76
Czosnyka M, Czosnyka Z, Keong N, Lavinio A, Smielewski P, Momjian S, Schmidt EA, Petrella G, Owler B, Pickard JD (2007) Pulse pressure waveform in hydrocephalus : what it is and what it isn’t. Neurosurg Focus 22:1–7
Davson H (1966) Formation and drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid. Sci Basis Med Annu Rev 1966:238–259
Davson H, Hollingsworth G, Segal MB (1970) The mechanism of drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid. Brain 93(4):665–678
Davson H, Domer FR, Hollingsworth JR (1973) The mechanism of drainage of the cerebrospinal fluid. Brain 96(2):329–336
Eide PK, Brean A (2010) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure amplitude during lumbar infusion in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus can predict response to shunting. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:1–11
Eide PK, Sorteberg W (2010) Diagnostic intracranial pressure monitoring and surgical management in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a 6-year review of 214 patients. Neurosurgery 66:80–91
Eklund A, Smielewski P, Chambers I, Alperin N, Malm J, Czosnyka M, Marmarou A (2007) Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow resistance. Med Biol Eng Comput 45:719–735
Greitz D (2004) Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus : new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 27:145–165
Hamilton R, Baldwin K, Fuller J, Vespa P, Hu X, Bergsneider M (2012) Intracranial pressure pulse waveform correlates with aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid stroke volume. J Appl Physiol 113(10):1560–1566
Lenfeldt N, Andersson N, Ågren-Wilson A, Bergenheim AT, Koskinen L-OD, Eklund A, Malm J (2004) Cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure method: a possible substitute for the examination of B waves. J Neurosurg 101:944–950
Linninger AA, Xenos M, Sweetman B, Ponkshe S, Guo X, Penn RD (2009) A mathematical model of blood, cerebrospinal fluid and brain dynamics. J Math Biol 59:729–759
Madsen JR, Egnor MR, Zou R (2006) Cerebrospinal fluid pulsatility and hydrocephalus: the fourth circulation. Clin Neurosurg 53:48–52
Malm J, Sundström N, Cesarini KG, Edsbagge M, Kristensen B, Leijon G, Eklund A (2012) Implementation of a new CSF dynamic device: a multicenter feasibility study in 562 patients. Acta Neurol Scand 125(3):199–205
Marmarou A, Shulman K, Rosende RM (1978) A nonlinear analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid system and intracranial pressure dynamics. J Neurosurg 48:332–344
Marmarou A, Bergsneider M, Klinge P, Relkin N, Black P (2005) The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 57:S17–S28
Miyati T, Mase M, Kasai H, Hara M, Yamada K, Shibamoto Y, Soellinger M, Baltes C, Luechinger R (2007) Noninvasive MRI assessment of intracranial compliance in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Magn Reson Imaging 26(2):274–278
Mokri B (2001) The Monro–Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology 56(12):1746–1748
Oresković D, Klarica M (2010) The formation of cerebrospinal fluid: nearly a hundred years of interpretations and misinterpretations. Brain Res Rev 64:241–262
Pollay M (2010) The function and structure of the cerebrospinal fluid outflow system. Cerebrospinal Fluid Res 7:9
Qvarlander S, Malm J, Eklund A (2010) The pulsatility curve—the relationship between mean intracranial pressure and pulsation amplitude. Physiol Meas 31(11):1517–1528
Qvarlander S, Lundkvist B, Koskinen LO, Malm J, Eklund A (2013) Pulsatility in CSF dynamics: pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 84(7):735–741
Redzic ZB, Segal MB (2004) The structure of the choroid plexus and the physiology of the choroid plexus epithelium. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 56:1695–1716
Ursino M (1988) A mathematical study of human intracranial hydrodynamics part 1—the cerebrospinal fluid pulse pressure. Ann Biomed Eng 16:379–401
Wåhlin A, Ambarki K, Birgander R, Alperin N, Malm J, Eklund A (2010) Assessment of craniospinal pressure-volume indices. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 31(9):1645–1650
Acknowledgments
This project was financed by the Swedish Research Council, VINNOVA, and the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research through their common initiative: “Biomedical engineering for improved health”; and by the European Union through ERDF: Objective 2, Northern Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
The volume change of CSF over time can be written as:
I f and I a are equal at ICPr, and thus, with the assumption that formation is pressure independent [4], I f can be described using Eq. (4):
Equation (15) can then be rewritten as:
The derivative of ICP with respect to time [Eq. (3)] can thus be expressed as:
The variable substitution x = 1/(ICP − P 0), or ICP = 1/x + P 0, gives:
In Eq. (18) this results in:
Rearranging this equation gives:
Equation (21) can be solved using the integrating factor (IF) method, where
with the appropriate IF results in:
and thus:
where A is a constant. In this case, the appropriate IF is:
For constant infusion (I ext = constant) starting at ICPstart (i.e., ICP(0) = ICPstart), the following equation for ICP as a function of time is then derived:
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Qvarlander, S., Malm, J. & Eklund, A. CSF dynamic analysis of a predictive pulsatility-based infusion test for normal pressure hydrocephalus. Med Biol Eng Comput 52, 75–85 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1110-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-013-1110-1