Abstract
Structural MRI of volunteers deemed “normal” following clinical interview provides a window into normal brain developmental morphology but also reveals unexpected dysmorphology, commonly known as “incidental findings.” Although unanticipated, these anatomical findings raise questions regarding possible treatment that could even ultimately require neurosurgical intervention, which itself carries significant risk but may not be indicated if the anomaly is nonprogressive or of no functional consequence. Neuroradiological readings of 833 structural MRI from the National Consortium on Alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in Adolescence (NCANDA) cohort found an 11.8 % incidence of brain structural anomalies, represented proportionately across the five collection sites and ethnic groups. Anomalies included 26 mega cisterna magna, 15 subarachnoid cysts, 12 pineal cysts, 12 white matter dysmorphologies, 5 tonsillar ectopias, 5 prominent perivascular spaces, 5 gray matter heterotopias, 4 pituitary masses, 4 excessively large or asymmetrical ventricles, 4 cavum septum pellucidum, 3 developmental venous anomalies, 1 exceptionally large midsagittal vein, and single cases requiring clinical followup: cranio-cervical junction stenosis, parietal cortical mass, and Chiari I malformation. A case of possible demyelinating disorder (e.g., neuromyelitis optica or multiple sclerosis) newly emerged at the 1-year NCANDA followup, requiring clinical referral. Comparing test performance of the 98 anomalous cases with 619 anomaly-free no-to-low alcohol consuming adolescents revealed significantly lower scores on speed measures of attention and motor functions; these differences were not attributed to any one anomaly subgroup. Further, we devised an automated approach for quantifying posterior fossa CSF volumes for detection of mega cisterna magna, which represented 26.5 % of clinically identified anomalies. Automated quantification fit a Gaussian distribution with a rightward skew. Using a 3SD cut-off, quantification identified 22 of the 26 clinically-identified cases, indicating that cases with percent of CSF in the posterior-inferior-middle aspect of the posterior fossa ≥3SD merit further review, and support complementing clinical readings with objective quantitative analysis. Discovery of asymptomatic brain structural anomalies, even when no clinical action is indicated, can be disconcerting to the individual and responsible family members, raising a disclosure dilemma: refrain from relating the incidental findings to avoid unnecessary alarm or anxiety; or alternatively, relate the neuroradiological findings as “normal variants” to the study volunteers and family, thereby equipping them with knowledge for the future should they have the occasion for a brain scan following an illness or accident that the incidental findings predated the later event.
References
Adam, R., & Greenberg, J. O. (1978). The mega cisterna magna. Journal of Neurosurgery, 48(2), 190–192. doi:10.3171/jns.1978.48.2.0190.
Akshoomoff, N., Newman, E., Thompson, W. K., McCabe, C., Bloss, C. S., Chang, L., et al. (2014). The NIH toolbox cognition battery: results from a large normative developmental sample (PING). Neuropsychology, 28(1), 1–10. doi:10.1037/neu0000001.
Barkovich, A. J., Kjos, B. O., Norman, D., & Edwards, M. S. (1989). Revised classification of posterior fossa cysts and cystlike malformations based on the results of multiplanar MR imaging. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 153(6), 1289–1300. doi:10.2214/ajr.153.6.1289.
Bava, S., Thayer, R., Jacobus, J., Ward, M., Jernigan, T. L., & Tapert, S. F. (2010). Longitudinal characterization of white matter maturation during adolescence. Brain Research, 1327, 38–46. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.02.066.
Bredlau, A. L., Constine, L. S., Silberstein, H. J., Milano, M. T., & Korones, D. N. (2012). Incidental brain lesions in children: to treat or not to treat? Journal of Neuro-Oncology, 106(3), 589–594. doi:10.1007/s11060-011-0695-1.
Brown, S. A., Brumback, T., Tomlinson, K., Cummins, K., Thompson, W. K., Nagel, B. J., et al. (2015). The National Consortium on alcohol and NeuroDevelopment in adolescence (NCANDA): a multi-site study of adolescent development and substance use. Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 76(6), 895–908.
Cramer, S. C., Wu, J., Hanson, J. A., Nouri, S., Karnani, D., Chuang, T. M., et al. (2011). A system for addressing incidental findings in neuroimaging research. NeuroImage, 55(3), 1020–1023. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.091.
Di Pietro, N. C., & Illes, J. (2013). Disclosing incidental findings in brain research: the rights of minors in decision-making. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 38(5), 1009–1013. doi:10.1002/jmri.24230.
Famini, P., Maya, M. M., & Melmed, S. (2011). Pituitary magnetic resonance imaging for sellar and parasellar masses: ten-year experience in 2598 patients. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 96(6), 1633–1641. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0168.
Giedd, J. N., Raznahan, A., Alexander-Bloch, A., Schmitt, E., Gogtay, N., & Rapoport, J. L. (2014). Child psychiatry branch of the National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal structural magnetic resonance imaging study of human brain development. Neuropsychopharmacology, 40(1), 43–49. doi:10.1038/npp.2014.236.
Gonsette, R., & Andre-Balisaux, G. (1968). A new technic of lumbosacral radiculography using a resorbable hydrosoluble medium without spinal anesthesia. Ann Radiol (Paris), 11(3), 141–145.
Gupta, S. N., & Belay, B. (2008). Intracranial incidental findings on brain MR images in a pediatric neurology practice: a retrospective study. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 264(1–2), 34–37. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2007.06.055.
Gupta, S., Kanamalla, U., & Gupta, V. (2010). Are incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance images in children merely incidental? Journal of Child Neurology, 25(12), 1511–1516. doi:10.1177/0883073810370622.
Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Calkins, M. E., Macy, L., Bilker, W. B., et al. (2010). A cognitive neuroscience-based computerized battery for efficient measurement of individual differences: standardization and initial construct validation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 187(2), 254–262. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2009.11.017.
Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Calkins, M. E., Chiavacci, R., Hansen, J. A., Bilker, W. B., et al. (2012). Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8-21. Neuropsychology, 26(2), 251–265. doi:10.1037/a0026712.
Gur, R. E., Kaltman, D., Melhem, E. R., Ruparel, K., Prabhakaran, K., Riley, M., et al. (2013). Incidental findings in youths volunteering for brain MRI research. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 34(10), 2021–2025. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3525.
Hartwigsen, G., Siebner, H. R., Deuschl, G., Jansen, O., & Ulmer, S. (2010). Incidental findings are frequent in young healthy individuals undergoing magnetic resonance imaging in brain research imaging studies: a prospective single-center study. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, 34(4), 596–600. doi:10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181d9c2bb.
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1986). Generalized additive models (with DIscussion). Statistical Science, 1, 297–318.
Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (1990). Exploring the nature of covariate effects in the proportional hazards model. Biometrics, 46(4), 1005–1016.
Illes, J. (2008). Brain screening and incidental findings: flocking to folly? Lancet Neurology, 7(1), 23–24. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70308-3.
Illes, J., Kirschen, M. P., Karetsky, K., Kelly, M., Saha, A., Desmond, J. E., et al. (2004). Discovery and disclosure of incidental findings in neuroimaging research. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 20(5), 743–747. doi:10.1002/jmri.20180.
Kaiser, D., Leach, J., Vannest, J., Schapiro, M., Holland, S., & Cincinnati, M. R. I. o. N. A. C (2015). Unanticipated findings in pediatric neuroimaging research: prevalence of abnormalities and process for reporting and clinical follow-up. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 9(1), 32–42. doi:10.1007/s11682-014-9327-7.
Kim, B. S., Illes, J., Kaplan, R. T., Reiss, A., & Atlas, S. W. (2002). Incidental findings on pediatric MR images of the brain. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 23(10), 1674–1677.
Kumra, S., Ashtari, M., Anderson, B., Cervellione, K. L., & Kan, L. (2006). Ethical and practical considerations in the management of incidental findings in pediatric MRI studies. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 45(8), 1000–1006. doi:10.1097/01.chi.0000222786.49477.a8.
Levin, H. S., Li, X., McCauley, S. R., Hanten, G., Wilde, E. A., & Swank, P. (2013). Neuropsychological outcome of mTBI: a principal component analysis approach. Journal of Neurotrauma, 30(8), 625–632. doi:10.1089/neu.2012.2627.
Li, W. C., Tu, C. H., Chao, H. T., Yeh, T. C., Chen, L. F., & Hsieh, J. C. (2015). High prevalence of incidental brain findings in primary dysmenorrhoea. European Journal of Pain, 19(8), 1071–1074. doi:10.1002/ejp.639.
Morris, Z., Whiteley, W. N., Longstreth Jr., W. T., Weber, F., Lee, Y. C., Tsushima, Y., et al. (2009). Incidental findings on brain magnetic resonance imaging: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 339, b3016.
Nagy, Z., & Jonsson, B. (2009). Cerebral MRI findings in a cohort of ex-preterm and control adolescents. Acta Paediatrica, 98(6), 996–1001. doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01278.x.
Petersen, A. C., Crockett, L., Richards, M., & Boxer, A. (1988). A self-report measure of pubertal status: reliability, validity, and initial norms. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 17(2), 117–133. doi:10.1007/BF01537962.
Pfefferbaum, A., Rohlfing, T., Pohl, K. M., Lane, B., Chu, W., Kwon, D., et al. (2015). Adolescent development of cortical and white matter structure in the NCANDA Sample: Role of Sex, Ethnicity, Puberty, and Alcohol Drinking. Cereb Cortex, doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv205.
Potchen, M. J., Kampondeni, S. D., Mallewa, M., Taylor, T. E., & Birbeck, G. L. (2013). Brain imaging in normal kids: a community-based MRI study in Malawian children. Tropical Medicine & International Health, 18(4), 398–402. doi:10.1111/tmi.12064.
Raznahan, A., Lee, Y., Stidd, R., Long, R., Greenstein, D., Clasen, L., et al. (2010). Longitudinally mapping the influence of sex and androgen signaling on the dynamics of human cortical maturation in adolescence. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(39), 16988–16993. doi:10.1073/pnas.1006025107.
Raznahan, A., Lerch, J. P., Lee, N., Greenstein, D., Wallace, G. L., Stockman, M., et al. (2011). Patterns of coordinated anatomical change in human cortical development: a longitudinal neuroimaging study of maturational coupling. Neuron, 72(5), 873–884. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.028.
Reneman, L., de Win, M. M., Booij, J., van den Brink, W., den Heeten, G. J., Freling, N., et al. (2012). Incidental head and neck findings on MRI in young healthy volunteers: prevalence and clinical implications. AJNR. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 33(10), 1971–1974. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3217.
Roth, J., Keating, R. F., Myseros, J. S., Yaun, A. L., Magge, S. N., & Constantini, S. (2012). Pediatric incidental brain tumors: a growing treatment dilemma. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 10(3), 168–174. doi:10.3171/2012.6.PEDS11451.
Shaw, P., Kabani, N. J., Lerch, J. P., Eckstrand, K., Lenroot, R., Gogtay, N., et al. (2008). Neurodevelopmental trajectories of the human cerebral cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(14), 3586–3594. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5309-07.2008.
Sowell, E. R., Thompson, P. M., Leonard, C. M., Welcome, S. E., Kan, E., & Toga, A. W. (2004). Longitudinal mapping of cortical thickness and brain growth in normal children. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24(38), 8223–8231. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1798-04.200424/38/8223.
Stiles, J., & Jernigan, T. L. (2010). The basics of brain development. Neuropsychology Review, 20(4), 327–348. doi:10.1007/s11065-010-9148-4.
Storsve, A. B., Fjell, A. M., Tamnes, C. K., Westlye, L. T., Overbye, K., Aasland, H. W., et al. (2014). Differential longitudinal changes in cortical thickness, surface area and volume across the adult life span: regions of accelerating and decelerating change. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(25), 8488–8498. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0391-14.2014.
Sullivan, E. V., Pfefferbaum, A., Rohlfing, T., Baker, F. C., Padilla, M. L., & Colrain, I. M. (2011). Developmental change in regional brain structure over 7 months in early adolescence: comparison of approaches for longitudinal atlas-based parcellation. NeuroImage, 57, 214–224. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.003.
Sullivan, E. V., Brumback, T., Tapert, S. F., Fama, R., Prouty, D., Brown, S. A., et al. (2016). Cognitive, emotion control, and motor performance of adolescents in the NCANDA study: Contributions from alcohol consumption, age, sex, ethnicity, and family history of addiction. Neuropsychology, 30(4), 449–473. doi:10.1037/neu0000259.
Toga, A. W., Thompson, P. M., & Sowell, E. R. (2006). Mapping brain maturation. Trends in Neurosciences, 29(3), 148–159. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2006.01.007.
Weber, F., & Knopf, H. (2006). Incidental findings in magnetic resonance imaging of the brains of healthy young men. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 240(1–2), 81–84. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2005.09.008.
Wierenga, L. M., Langen, M., Oranje, B., & Durston, S. (2014). Unique developmental trajectories of cortical thickness and surface area. NeuroImage, 87, 120–126. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.010.
Wolf, S. M., Lawrenz, F. P., Nelson, C. A., Kahn, J. P., Cho, M. K., Clayton, E. W., et al. (2008). Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(2), 219–248 211. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x.
Wood, S. N. (2006). Low-rank scale-invariant tensor product smooths for generalized additive mixed models. Biometrics, 62(4), 1025–1036. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00574.x.
Wood, S. N. (2011). Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B), 73(1), 3–36.
Yildiz, H., Yazici, Z., Hakyemez, B., Erdogan, C., & Parlak, M. (2006). Evaluation of CSF flow patterns of posterior fossa cystic malformations using CSF flow MR imaging. Neuroradiology, 48(9), 595–605. doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0098-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Funding
This work was supported by the U.S. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism with co-funding from the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [NCANDA grant numbers: AA021697 (A.P. + K.M.P.), AA021695 (S.A.B. + S.F.T.), AA021692 (S.A.B. + S.F.T.), AA021696 (I.M.C. + F.C.B.), AA021681 (M.D.D.B.), AA021690 (D.B.C.), AA021691 (B.N.)]. Additional funding supported E.V.S. (AA017168).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest with the work reported herein.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants, parents, or legal guardians who were majority, and assent from minors included in the study.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
ESM (DOCX 242 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sullivan, E.V., Lane, B., Kwon, D. et al. Structural brain anomalies in healthy adolescents in the NCANDA cohort: relation to neuropsychological test performance, sex, and ethnicity. Brain Imaging and Behavior 11, 1302–1315 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9634-2
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-016-9634-2