Elsevier

Surgical Neurology

Volume 17, Issue 3, March 1982, Pages 213-217
Surgical Neurology

Mechanical and neurological response of cat spinal cord under static loading

https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(82)90284-1Get rights and content

Abstract

The force/deformation relationship of the exposed spinal cord of cats was studied when the force was gradually applied posteriorly at T10. A linear elastic behavior was identified for deformation less than 0.5 mm, but it was not observed when the static force was no longer supported by the dural sheath. Nonlinear force/deformation relationships were observed for larger deformation, along with a strong hysteresis during a cycle of compression and decompression. The mechanical behavior remained practically the same in a repeated loading if the deformation was less than 2 mm. The motor function of cats did not recover after the cord had been compressed to 4 mm. The associated static force was about 15% of the dynamic force producing the same deformation.

References (9)

  • MS Albin et al.

    Study of functional recovery produced by delayed localized cooling after spinal cord injury in primates

    J Neurosurg

    (1968)
  • AR Allen

    Surgery of experimental lesion of the spinal cord equivalent to crush injury of fracture dislocation of spinal column

    JAMA

    (1911)
  • AR Allen

    Remarks on the histopathological changes in the spinal cord due to impact

  • GJ Dohrmann et al.

    “Standardized” spinal cord trauma: biomechanical parameters and lesion volume

    Surg Neurol

    (1976)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (49)

  • Biomechanical effects of spinal cord compression due to ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum: A finite element analysis

    2013, Medical Engineering and Physics
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the compression test for validation, deformation under 0.08 N was 1.59 mm as compared to 1.5 mm that was observed in a previous study [22]. In addition, the shape of the force–deformation curve for our model was consistent with that of a previous study [22] in which the relative differences in deformation under 0.02 N, 0.04 N, 0.06 N, and 0.08 N were 18.8%, 11.7%, 2.1%, and 6.0%, respectively, in comparison with the previous study (Fig. 3(a)). The stress–strain curve for the tensile test was located between those of the white matter and gray matter as shown previously depicting a typical nonlinear ‘J-shape’ for soft biological tissues [20] (Fig. 3(b)).

  • Syringomyelia: A review of the biomechanics

    2013, Journal of Fluids and Structures
View all citing articles on Scopus

This study was supported by the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke under Grant RO1-NS-13238

Presently at Ebasco Services, Inc., World Trade Center, New York, NY.

Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Health and Science Center, San Antonio, TX.

View full text