Trends in Neurosciences
Volume 13, Issue 12, December 1990, Pages 474-479
PerspectivesCorticospinal, rubrospinal and rubro-olivary projections: a unifying hypothesis
References (52)
- et al.
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988) - et al.
Prog. Brain Res.
(1980) - et al.
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988) Brain Res.
(1987)- et al.
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988) Behav. Brain Res.
(1988)- et al.
Brain Res.
(1986) - et al.
Brain Res.
(1976) - et al.
Brain Res.
(1983) - et al.
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988)
Neurosci. Res.
(1987)
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988)
Behav. Brain Res.
(1988)
Brain Res.
(1977)
Medical Hypotheses
(1979)
Neurosci. Lett.
(1987)
Brain Res.
(1972)
Brain Res.
(1972)
J. Neurophysiol.
(1980)
J. Neurophysiol.
(1986)
Brain Res.
(1972)
Dynamic Aspects of Neocortical Function
Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol.
(1988)
Brain
(1968)
Ann. Neurol.
(1978)
Cited by (135)
Motor cortex projections to red and pontine nuclei have distinct roles during movement in the mouse
2023, Neuroscience LettersIntersectional genetic tools to study skilled reaching in mice
2022, Experimental NeurologyLocalization of the corticospinal tract within the porcine spinal cord: Implications for experimental modeling of traumatic spinal cord injury
2017, Neuroscience LettersCitation Excerpt :Indeed, studies have shown that injury to either the rodent RST, CST or a combination result significant motor impairment [26–30]. Furthermore it has been observed that isolated injury to either the RST or CST resulted in recovery of motor function, whilst injury of both resulted in permanent loss of motor function [31]. Such studies imply that there is combined innervation of motor function between the multiple motor tracts and that plasticity of each may enhance the recovery when one is damaged.
Copyright © 1990 Published by Elsevier Ltd.