Original contribution
Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(94)92201-2Get rights and content

Abstract

A method is presented for simulating susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging of arbitrary susceptibility distributions. The method incorporates object induced field perturbations in the time domain (k-space) and is demonstrated for spherical nonuniformities in susceptibility. Both simulations and experimental results for multi-slice 2D and 3D imaging of phantoms and human subjects are provided.

References (18)

  • C.J.G. Bakker et al.

    Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1993)
  • R. Bhagwandien et al.

    Numerical analysis of the magnetic field for arbitrary magnetic susceptibility distributions in 2D

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1992)
  • K.M. Luedeke et al.

    Susceptibility artifacts in NMR imaging

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1985)
  • E.M. Haacke et al.

    Reduction of T2 dephasing in gradient field-echo imaging

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • M.F. Boada et al.

    Superparamagnetic contrast agents: predicting signal loss in gradient-echo imaging

    JMRI

    (1993)
  • J.C. Ford et al.

    Magnetic field distribution in models of trabecular bone

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1993)
  • P.F.J. New et al.

    Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging

    Radiology

    (1983)
  • W. Heindel et al.

    Artifacts in MR imaging after surgical intervention

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1986)
  • S. Holtas et al.

    Comparison of MR imaging and CT in patients with intracranial aneurysm clips

    AJNR

    (1988)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (71)

  • Imaging patients pre and post deep brain stimulation: Localization of the electrodes and their targets

    2021, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    In addition, the time domain (k-space) DBS electrode simulation is a powerful tool that helped us understand and predict the effect of electrode-induced and inherent static field inhomogeneity in MRI. The method offers flexibility in studying the effects of various experimental conditions and parameter settings on the appearance of susceptibility artifacts in both SE and GRE imaging and may be employed to provide insight into a number of related artifacts familiar from clinical practice and reported in the literature [27,28]. Examples include geometry and intensity distortions associated with air cavities, foreign bodies, blood vessels, hemangiomas, trabecular bone, etc.

  • Metal Artifact Reduction in Musculoskeletal Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    2006, Orthopedic Clinics of North America
    Citation Excerpt :

    The magnitude of local misregistration artifact also is inversely proportional to the frequency encoding (readout) gradient strength used in the imaging acquisition [18]. Misregistration artifacts occur only in the frequency encoding direction and are not seen in the phase encoding direction because of the type of phase encoding used in clinical sequences (variable amplitude encoding) [23–25]. Because misregistration artifacts occur only in the frequency encoding direction, orientation of the frequency and phase encoding gradients can be selected such that misregistration artifacts are directed away from areas of anticipated clinical diagnostic interest.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text