Technical issues for MRI examination of the posterior fossa

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(99)00277-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Examination of the posterior fossa by magnetic resonance imaging is discussed with respect to modern techniques and equipment, and including recent results of non-conventional studies in multiple sclerosis. Optimal protocol design will maximize resolution and signal strength while providing diagnostic contrast. Motion artifact from the sigmoid and transverse sinuses may appear as ghosting and can be mitigated with proper imaging parameter choices.

Introduction

Imaging of the posterior fossa by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is typically performed as part of a standard brain examination. Hence, it offers the advantages, as well as challenges and limitations, of current brain MRI. The normal anatomy of the posterior fossa is well visualized on MRI. The pons, medulla, 4th ventricle, cerebellum, cisterns, and vascular structures are best seen on T1-weighted images. Lesions deforming the basic normal anatomy may be obvious just by morphology on these images. Identification of hyperintensity on T2-weighted images is most useful for the detection of parenchymal lesions. Imaging may be compromised by the presence of artifact as with all MRI. In the posterior fossa, motion artifact seen as ghosting from the sigmoid and transverse sinuses may be especially apparent. Conventional MRI imaging of the brain is discussed extensively in textbooks and recent reviews [1], [2]. Newer and more advanced techniques including quantitation of conventional MRI data, magnetic resonance spectroscopy, and quantitative imaging including magnetization transfer may enhance future analysis of posterior fossa abnormalities. Structures of posterior fossa, in particular the brain stem and cerebellum, figure prominently in clinical disability scales, and thus targeted assessment of damage in these regions might be expected to correlate better with clinical disability when compared to whole brain measures.

Section snippets

Resolution, contrast, and signal

The posterior fossa is typically imaged as part of a routine brain study with approximately 1 mm resolution in plane and 3 mm slice thickness, for an overall volume element (voxel) measurement of 3 mm3. Timing parameters for fast spin echo acquisition include 4–6 s repetition times (TR) and effective echo time (TE) of 90 ms for T2-weighting. Fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging may be performed with TR of 11 s and TE 140 ms and inversion time of 2200 ms. Application of FLAIR in

Motion artifact in the posterior fossa

The presence of the sigmoid and transverse sinuses in the posterior fossa gives rise to potentially troublesome ghost artifacts due to flowing blood. They are ubiquitous in axial slices at the level of the sinuses and manifest as ‘copies’ of the vessel superimposed on the image. Certain aspects of this artifact are under the control of the imaging technologist and should be understood for optimal imaging results. Specifically, any structures that periodically change position or velocity with

Investigation of cerebellar ataxia

Conventional and non-conventional MR techniques have been applied in the posterior fossa, including magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), offering the possibility of insight into neuronal loss. This takes on increased importance in light of recent findings in multiple sclerosis (MS) that describe greater than expected axonal loss in that disease [6]. In a 1995 study, Davie et al. applied several conventional and non-conventional techniques to a study of this region. They examined 11 MS

Posterior fossa atrophy

Of interest in the study of dementias is the presence of atrophy in the posterior fossa, particularly in the brain stem and cerebellum. This was explored in two recent studies by Filippi et al. and by Edwards et al., who found that both brain stem and cerebellar volumes were reduced in MS. Significant correlations were found between measures of atrophy in these regions and clinical measures including the Scripps neurological rating scale and the infratentorial functional score [9], [10].

Conclusions

MRI of the posterior fossa, with optimal technique for that region, offers the potential for complementary information useful in the diagnosis and prognosis of MS. There may be substantial differences between lesions of the posterior fossa and supratentorial lesions, and non-conventional techniques may provide new insight into their investigation.

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by NIH grant NS34353.

References (10)

  • M. Filippi et al.

    Quantitative volumetric analysis of brain magnetic resonance imaging from patients with multiple sclerosis

    J Neurol Sci

    (1998)
  • S. Atlas

    Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine

    (1996)
  • R. Grossman et al.

    Perspectives on Multiple Sclerosis

    Am J Neurosci Res

    (1998)
  • M.L. Gawne-Cain et al.

    Fast FLAIR of the brain: the range of appearances in normal subjects and its application to quantification of white-matter disease

    Neuroradiology

    (1997)
  • M.L. Gawne-Cain et al.

    Multiple sclerosis lesion detection in the brain: a comparison of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery and conventional T2-weighted dual spin echo

    Neurology

    (1997)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (15)

  • Relaxometry and brain myelin quantification with synthetic MRI in MS subtypes and their associations with spinal cord atrophy

    2022, NeuroImage: Clinical
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, partial volume effects can have an impact on tissue classification in the SyMRI tissue compartment model at the boundaries between different tissue types or at interfaces between brain and CSF. Particularly in infratentorial structures, pulse and motion artifacts produced from vascular structures (transverse and sigmoid sinuses) or CSF can interfere with the relaxation process (McGowan and Patel, 2000; Chougar et al., 2020). Furthermore, susceptibility artifacts at air-tissue or bone-soft tissue interfaces (i.e. mastoid cells, sphenoid sinus) in EPI-based acquisitions, such as QRAPMASTER could also influence the estimation of myelin based on the SyMRI tissue model (Zhuo and Gullapalli, 2006) With regard to the ROI analysis we performed, imperfections in the ROIs-registration especially in small structures – in spite of carefully reviewing our MRI data – are able to influence the precision of our results.

  • Automatic magnetic resonance spinal cord segmentation with topology constraints for variable fields of view

    2013, NeuroImage
    Citation Excerpt :

    Inhomogeneities in receiver coil sensitivity can manifest as spatially distributed intensity biases. Susceptibility may create artifacts in the spinal cord proximal to the posterior fossa region (McGowan and Patel, 2000). Image quality is also degraded by truncation artifacts (Czervionke et al., 1988), ghosting artifacts from the heart and great vessels (Bronskill et al., 1988; Curtin et al., 1989; Hinks and Quencer, 1988; Levy et al., 1988) and contrast (Lycklama et al., 2003).

  • Magnetic resonance techniques for the brainstem

    2010, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
  • Comparing lesion detection of infratentorial multiple sclerosis lesions between T2-weighted spin-echo, 2D-FLAIR, and 3D-FLAIR sequences

    2018, Clinical Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, the number of infratentorial lesions detected is often lower on 2D-FLAIR [4,5]. A factor contributing to the decreased sensitivity may be due to masking of lesions from adjacent artifacts related to CSF inflow and sigmoid and transverse sinuses blood flow [6,7]. McGown et al. hypothesized that FLAIR sequences were not optimized in the evaluation of the infratentorial parenchyma, and stated that it may be due to differences in relaxation times when compared to the supratentorial parenchyma [6,7].

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text