Review article
Tissue-specific MR contrast agents

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00332-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this review is to outline recent trends in contrast agent development for magnetic resonance imaging. Up to now, small molecular weight gadolinium chelates are the workhorse in contrast enhanced MRI. These first generation MR contrast agents distribute into the intravascular and interstitial space, thus allowing the evaluation of physiological parameters, such as the status or existence of the blood–brain-barrier or the renal function. Shortly after the first clinical use of paramagnetic metallochelates in 1983, compounds were suggested for liver imaging and enhancing a cardiac infarct. Meanwhile, liver specific contrast agents based on gadolinium, manganese or iron become reality. Dedicated blood pool agents will be available within the next years. These gadolinium or iron agents will be beneficial for longer lasting MRA procedures, such as cardiac imaging. Contrast enhanced lymphography after interstitial or intravenous injection will be another major step forward in diagnostic imaging. Metastatic involvement will be seen either after the injection of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxides or dedicated gadolinium chelates. The accumulation of both compound classes is triggered by an uptake into macrophages. It is likely that similar agents will augment MRI of atheriosclerotic plaques, a systemic inflammatory disease of the arterial wall. Thrombus-specific agents based on small gadolinium labeled peptides are on the horizon. It is very obvious that the future of cardiovascular MRI will benefit from the development of new paramagnetic and superparamagnetic substances. The expectations for new tumor-, pathology- or receptor-specific agents are high. However, is not likely that such a compound will be available for daily routine MRI within the next decade.

Introduction

The clinical introduction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the early 1980s revolutionized diagnostic imaging. The breath-taking progress in computer technology has made multidimensional imaging a reality, producing images within seconds without time-consuming data processing. These techniques allow physicians to accurately diagnose many pathologies noninvasively. The use of paramagnetic metallochelates makes the method even more sensitive and the diagnosis more specific.

The first generation MR contrast agents distribute into the intravascular and interstitial space. These often called ‘unspecific agents’ allow the evaluation of physiological parameters, such as the status or existence of the blood–brain-barrier or the renal function. However, compounds with a tissue-specific distribution to detect focal anomalies or evaluate tissue function may be desirable to improve diagnostic accuracy. The definition of ‘tissue-specific distribution’ is not a simple matter, since an extracellular agent also distributes specifically in the body. Agents such as Magnevist® elicit an extraordinary organ-specific distribution due to their glomerular filtration. These renal-specific agents accumulate in the kidneys at much higher concentrations than in the blood or any other tissue. Another recently found, remarkable feature of so-called unspecific compounds is their ability to discriminate between viable and nonviable myocardium [1]. Extracellular agents can elicit properties of necrosis-specific compounds [2], [3], [4]. In many cases, analysis of enhancement kinetics allows a classification of the pathology; for example, a fast increase in signal intensity is more characteristic of a mamma carcinoma than a benign process [5], [6]. A pharmacokinetic interpretation of enhancement kinetics is helpful in assessing physiological parameters, such as tumor angiogenesis and microvessel density [7]. Analysis of the bolus kinetics of these unspecific agents can also determine cerebral blood flow and volume [8].

Shortly after the first clinical use of paramagnetic metallochelates, the first attempts at targeting paramagnetic substances to specific cells or tissues were published [9]. Compounds were suggested for liver imaging and enhancing a cardiac infarct [10].

This article reviews the latest developments in making contrast-enhanced MRI even more specific, moving from a tissue characteristic distribution towards molecular imaging.

Section snippets

Liver-specific agents

Extracellular gadolinium (Gd) chelates improve the diagnosis of focal liver lesions. Imaging in the first minutes after injection (‘dynamic phase’) allows a better differential diagnosis but does not always improve the detection rate [11], [12], [13]. As with contrast media (CM)-enhanced computed tomography (CT), gadolinium enhancement patterns reflect the degree of vascularity, flow dynamics and vascular perfusion.

However, the gadolinium enhancement is not really specific to the liver tissue.

Blood-pool agents

MR angiography (MRA) is a perfect example of how imaging technology and imaging diagnostics mature. In the beginning, MRA was clearly an indication without contrast agents. Then, fast imaging technologies were further improved by using relaxation enhancers. Since imaging is still time consuming, compounds that remain in the intravascular space are desirable. However, imaging becomes faster and faster, and the future role of blood-pool agents in MRA is still open. Several paramagnetic and

Gadolinium chelates

Since endolymphatic administration of a substance is an invasive and cumbersome procedure, agents that contrast the lymphatic system after interstitial or intravenous injection are desirable. Various gadolinium-containing formulations contrast the lymphatic vessels and the first lymph nodes (sentinel LN) after an interstitial injection of very low dose. Low-molecular-weight chelates, as well as polymeric agents, also used as blood pool agents, can be used for this indication [95], [96], [97],

Atherosclerotic plaques

New CT and MRI techniques can be used to image atherosclerotic plaques. Detailed information about the status of this systemic disease and the total burden is limited, but MRI studies of the carotid arteries look promising [110], [111], [112], [113], [114], [115], [116]. An imaging modality that could quantify the atherosclerotic plaque burden and composition and the degree of inflammation has the potential to both identify vulnerable atherosclerotic lesions and monitor the effects of

Tumor-specific agents

The clinician's dream of an agent that accumulates highly and specifically in malignant tumors, allowing an accurate diagnosis at a stage when the disease is still treatable, is still far from reality. Studies that describe so called nontoxic, tumor-specific agents are somewhat misleading. Some investigations were performed without relevant controls.

It was suggested that porphyrins or even metalloporphyrins might target tumor cells. Although strong enhancement resulted after the intravenous

Others

The early detection of pancreatic tumors is still a critical issue in diagnostic imaging. It was shown that MnDPDP positively contrasts pancreatic tissue, however, this observation currently has no significant clinical consequences [21], [123], [124], [125], [126]. It is likely that the enhancement is caused by Mn2+ released from DPDP, since a binding of free Mn2+ to pancreatic tissue has been described in the literature [127], [128], [129].

Most of a specific cell–cell interaction or

Conclusion

Paramagnetic contrast agents have become an integral part of the daily practice of MRI because of their efficacy and their excellent tolerance profile. MRI is very sensitive to the contrast-medium effect, allowing a significant reduction in dose when compared to X-ray technologies. However, using standard contrast materials, such as gadopentetate, gram amounts per patient are still necessary for enhancing brain tumors. Thus, MRI is far less sensitive than either SPECT or PET. New MR agents with

References (158)

  • F.M. Cavagna et al.

    Preclinical profile and clinical potential of gadocoletic acid trisodium salt (B22956/1), a new intravascular contrast medium for MRI

    Acad. Radiol.

    (2002)
  • M. Port et al.

    P792: a rapid clearance blood pool agent for magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary results

    Magma

    (2001)
  • B. Misselwitz et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of Gadomer-17, a new dendritic magnetic resonance contrast agent

    Magma

    (2001)
  • B. Tombach et al.

    First-pass and equilibrium phase MRA following intravenous bolus injection of SH U 555 C: Phase I clinical trial in elderly volunteers with risk factors for arterial vascular disease

    Acad. Radiol.

    (2002)
  • B. Misselwitz et al.

    Gadofluorine 8: initial experience with a new contrast medium for interstitial MR lymphography

    Magma

    (1999)
  • R.J. Kim et al.

    Relationship of MRI delayed contrast enhancement to irreversible injury, infarct age, and contractile function

    Circulation

    (1999)
  • B. Hofmann et al.

    Mechanism of gadophrin-2 accumulation in tumor necrosis

    J. Magn. Res. Imaging

    (1999)
  • G. Marchal et al.

    Paramagnetic metalloporphyrins: infarct avid contrast agents for diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction by MRI

    Eur. Radiol.

    (1996)
  • S.H. Heywang et al.

    MR imaging of the breast with Gd–DTPA: use and limitations

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • W.A. Kaiser et al.

    MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd–DTPA. Preliminary observations

    Radiology

    (1989)
  • A. Villringer et al.

    Dynamic imaging with lanthanide chelates in normal brain: contrast due to magnetic susceptibility effects

    Magn. Res. Med.

    (1988)
  • R.B. Lauffer et al.

    Iron–EHPG as an hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: initial imaging and biodistribution studies

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1985)
  • R. Weissleder et al.

    Antimyosin-labeled monocrystalline iron oxide allows detection of myocardial infarct: MR antibody imaging

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • B. Hamm et al.

    Focal liver lesions: characterization with nonenhanced and dynamic contrast material-enhanced MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1994)
  • S. Saini et al.

    Technique for MR imaging of the liver

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • D.L. Rubin et al.

    A multicenter, randomized, double-blind study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of OptiMARK (gadoversetamide injection) compared with Magnevist (gadopentetate dimeglumine) in patients with liver pathology: results of a Phase III clinical trial

    J. Magn. Res. Imaging

    (1999)
  • R. Weissleder et al.

    MR receptor imaging: ultrasmall iron oxide particles targeted to asialoglycoprotein receptors

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (1990)
  • K.O. Lim et al.

    Hepatobiliary MR imaging: first human experience with MnDPDP

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • K.G. Toft et al.

    Metabolism of mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP), a new contrast medium for magnetic resonance imaging, in beagle dogs

    Eur. J. Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet.

    (1997)
  • B. Gallez et al.

    Evidence for the dissociation of the hepatobiliary MRI contrast agent Mn-DPDP

    Magn. Res. Med.

    (1996)
  • H. Brurok et al.

    Effects of manganese dipyridoxyl diphosphate, dipyridoxyl diphosphate and manganese chloride on cardiac function. An experimental study in the Langendorff perfused rat heart

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1995)
  • H.B. Gehl et al.

    Mn-DPDP in MR imaging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: initial clinical experience

    Radiology

    (1993)
  • H. Ahlstrom et al.

    Overview of MnDPDP as a pancreas-specific contrast agent for MR imaging

    Acta Radiol.

    (1997)
  • C. Wang

    Mangafodipir trisodium (MnDPDP)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the liver and pancreas

    Acta Radiol. Suppl.

    (1998)
  • M. Oudkerk et al.

    Characterization of liver lesions with mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging: multicenter study comparing MR and dual-phase spiral CT

    Radiology

    (2002)
  • G. Vittadini et al.

    B-19036, a potential new hepatobiliary contrast agent for MR proton imaging

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1988)
  • H.-J. Weinmann et al.

    A new lipophilic gadolinium chelate as a tissue-specific contrast medium for MRI

    Magn. Res. Med.

    (1991)
  • G. Schuhmann-Giampieri et al.

    Preclinical evaluation of Gd–EOB-DTPA as a contrast agent in MR imaging of the hepatobiliary system

    Radiology

    (1992)
  • C. Petré et al.

    Detection and characterization of primary liver cancer in rats by MS-264-enhanced MRI

    Magn. Res. Med.

    (1996)
  • V.M. Runge et al.

    A comparison of MR hepatobiliary gadolinium chelates

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (1995)
  • J.E. van Montfoort et al.

    Hepatic uptake of the magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent gadoxetate by the organic anion transporting polypeptide Oatp1

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (1999)
  • V. Lorusso et al.

    Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution in animals of gadobenate ion, the magnetic resonance imaging contrast enhancing component of gadobenate dimeglumine 0.5 M solution for injection (MultiHance)

    J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr.

    (1999)
  • G. Pirovano et al.

    Evaluation of the accuracy of gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in the detection and characterization of focal liver lesions

    Am. J. Roentgenol.

    (2000)
  • J. Petersein et al.

    Focal liver lesions: evaluation of the efficacy of gadobenate dimeglumine in MR imaging—a multicenter phase III clinical study

    Radiology

    (2000)
  • G. Schuhmann-Giampieri et al.

    Pharmacokinetics of the liver-specific contrast agent Gd–EOB-DTPA in relation to contrast-enhanced liver imaging in humans

    J. Clin. Pharmacol.

    (1997)
  • B. Hamm et al.

    Phase I clinical evaluation of Gd–EOB-DTPA as a hepatobiliary MR contrast agent: safety, pharmacokinetics, and MR imaging

    Radiology

    (1995)
  • S.A. Schmitz et al.

    Detection of focal liver lesions: CT of the hepatobiliary system with gadoxetic acid disodium, or Gd–EOB-DTPA

    Radiology

    (1997)
  • T.J. Vogl et al.

    Liver tumors: comparison of MR imaging with Gd–EOB-DTPA and Gd–DTPA

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • P. Reimer et al.

    Phase II clinical evaluation of Gd–EOB-DTPA: dose, safety aspects, and pulse sequence

    Radiology

    (1996)
  • V.M. Runge et al.

    Evaluation of gadolinium 2,5-BPA-DO3A, a new macrocyclic hepatobiliary chelate, in normal liver and metastatic disease on high field magnetic resonance imaging

    Invest. Radiol.

    (1996)
  • Cited by (233)

    • Contrast agents for MRI and side effects

      2022, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Volume 1-4
    • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Agents

      2021, Molecular Imaging: Principles and Practice
    • Nanotheranostics: Their role in hepatocellular carcinoma

      2020, Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology
    • Magnetoliposomes for dual cancer therapy

      2018, Inorganic Frameworks as Smart Nanomedicines
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text