Elsevier

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volume 158, Issues 1–2, September–October 2002, Pages 164-168
Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Communication
An efficient algorithm for automatic phase correction of NMR spectra based on entropy minimization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-7807(02)00069-1Get rights and content

Abstract

A new algorithm for automatic phase correction of NMR spectra based on entropy minimization is proposed. The optimal zero-order and first-order phase corrections for a NMR spectrum are determined by minimizing entropy. The objective function is constructed using a Shannon-type information entropy measure. Entropy is defined as the normalized derivative of the NMR spectral data. The algorithm has been successfully applied to experimental 1HNMR spectra. The results of automatic phase correction are found to be comparable to, or perhaps better than, manual phase correction. The advantages of this automatic phase correction algorithm include its simple mathematical basis and the straightforward, reproducible, and efficient optimization procedure. The algorithm is implemented in the Matlab program ACME—Automated phase Correction based on Minimization of Entropy.

Introduction

Normally, zero-order and first-order phase corrections are required for Fourier transform NMR spectra in order to obtain the desired appearance of the real part of the spectra. The zero-order phase misadjustment arises from the phase difference between the reference phase and the receiver detector phase. The first-order phase misadjustment arises from the time delay between excitation and detection, flip-angle variation across the spectrum, and phase shifts from the filter employed to reduce noise outside the spectral bandwidth [1], [2], [3]. Zero-order phase correction is frequency-independent, while first-order phase correction is frequency-dependent.

The misphased Fourier transform NMR spectrum consisting of the complex points can be phase corrected by applying the equationsRi=Ri0cosi)−Ii0sini),Ii=Ii0cosi)+Ri0sini),where Ri0 and Ii0 represent the misphased ith data points for the real and imaginary parts of the NMR spectral data, respectively, Ri and Ii denote the phase-corrected ith data points, and φi is the total phase correction in radians applied to the ith data points as shown inφi=phc0+phc1×in,where phc0 is the zero-order term, phc1 is the constant part of the first-order term, and n is the total number of real data points.

There already exist algorithms automating the procedure of phase correction. As early as 1969, Ernst [4] introduced an automatic phase correction method using the Hilbert transform to find a dispersion spectrum with total integral zero and absorption spectrum with maximum integral. This approach is limited by the spectral signal-to-noise ratio and baseline distortion. Craig and Marshall [1] proposed a method based on dispersion versus absorption plots (DISPA). However, when there are no isolated spectral lines, the phases cannot be calculated correctly because overlap distorts the DISPA circle. Van Vaals and Gerwen [5] developed a method employing the measured phases at the peak positions of spectral lines to calculate the phase distortion. Brown et al. [6] introduced an automatic method by baseline optimization. Heuer [7] reported a noniterative method, APSL (automatic phasing by symmetrizing lines), for automatic phase correction. This approach exploits the fact that symmetric lines are maximally symmetric in correctly phased absorption spectra.

Although many algorithms have been proposed for automatic phase correction, some of them involve rather complicated mathematical models and some are limited by signal-to-noise ratio or overlapping bands. In this paper, an efficient algorithm for automatic phase correction is proposed based on entropy minimization.

Section snippets

Theory

Compared with the initial Fourier transform NMR spectra, the desired phased NMR spectra have nonnegative bands and show, in many ways, the simplest spectral features. However, it can be noted that the simplest representation of a signal corresponds to its entropy-minimized form (given an appropriate measure). Every probability distribution has some uncertainty associated with it. The concept of “entropy” for a quantitative measure of uncertainty was first introduced to information theory by

Experimental details and results

The experimental data used in this study arise from the reaction of CpCr(CO)2(S2CNEt2) and [CpCr(CO)3]2 in d8-Toluene as solvent [19]. 1HNMR spectra were measured on a Bruker 300 MHz FT NMR spectrometer. The digital resolution of the frequency domain spectrum was 0.726609 Hz/Pt. There are 4551 data points for each spectrum. 1D Bruker WIN-NMR software was used to analyze the data. Prior to Fourier transformation, DC correction and exponential apodization with LB=0.1 (line broadening factor) were

Further discussion

The present algorithm is, in and of itself, an interesting alternative to previous methods for phase correction in NMR spectroscopy. However, it is interesting to note that the motivation for this development actually arose from the need to process hundred, even thousands, of sequential NMR spectra obtained from reaction studies. The resulting NMR spectra, having the important characteristic of minimized entropy, are thus properly preconditioned for further numerical analysis—particularly

Conclusions

Automatic phase correction for FT NMR spectra drew considerable attention in the 1990s [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. Various automatic algorithms for phase correction had been proposed using DISPA, symmetrizing lines, baseline optimization, etc. These algorithms are limited by signal-to-noise ratio, overlapping bands, etc. In contrast, the automatic phase correction algorithm presented in this contribution only employs the rather straightforward concept of signal entropy. Entropy minimization

References (26)

  • E.C. Craig et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1988)
  • B.L. Neff et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1977)
  • J.-M. Daubenfeld et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1985)
  • R.R. Ernst

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1969)
  • J.J. van Vaals et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1990)
  • D.E. Brown et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1989)
  • A. Heuer

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1991)
  • S. Watanabe

    Pattern Recognition

    (1981)
  • Y.Z. Zeng et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1998)
  • R.E. Hoffman et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1992)
  • N. Miyabayashi

    Bunseki Kagaku

    (1995)
  • C. Chen et al.

    Comput. Methods Programs Biomed.

    (1988)
  • H.T. Hu et al.

    J. Magn. Reson.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text